HOME PAGE9/11 TRUTH BOOKGod Bless The America BOOKRABBI DOV ZAKHEIM 9/11The 9/11 Pentagon InfestationWTC BUILDING 7 - 9/11WTC JEW ART STUDENTS 9/11Donald Rumsfeld On 911Dr. Jones and 9/11 Thermate9/11 OMISSION COMMISSIONA & E For 9/11 Truth9/11 Traitors & SuspectsBOLLYN 911 Truth9/11 TRUTH LINKS9/11 RECOMMENDED READINGFALSE FLAG OPERATIONSUSS LIBERTY TRUTH-FACTSL.B.J. Blackmailed & BribedWHITE GENOCIDEWHO CONTROLS THE USAWHITE HOUSE CONTROLTRAITOR RAHM EMANUELTRAITOR SHELDON ADELSONTrojan Horse TRUMPHollywood TV ControlJEW LOBBY A LISTAIPAC POWERHENRY FORD VS. THE JEWSGEORGE ORWELL & HUXLEYTHE ODED YINON PLANHOUSE OF ROTHSCHILDBaron Edmond de RothschildThe Protocols of ZionEdward Bernays PropagandaCOMMUNISM IS JUDAISMCommunism By The BackdoorThe Jew Frankfurt SchoolZionist Master PlanHIDDEN JEWISH TYRANNYJEWISH POWER BASESJew-Zionist OrganizationsBilderbergers 2018 ListJew Control Gun ControlDROP THE JEW TABOOBOYCOTT ISRAELBANKER'S WARSBANKSTERSWAR IS A RACKETSilent Weapons Quiet WarsIsrael's Samson OptionIsrael's Third World WarsFEDERAL RESERVE BANKI.R.S. The Real FactsMASONIC VICTORIESISRAEL SPIES ON USAHENRY KISSINGERSONGBIRD John McCAINGreat Sedition Trial 1944ROBERT E. EDMONDSONELZABETH DILLINGFATHER COUGHLINSir Oswald MosleyCromwell and the JewsJames Traficant KNEW (RIP)A JEW EXPOSES ISRAELJimmy Carter on PalestineRemember Rachel CorrieTHE BALFOUR DECLARATIONHistory of Zionist CrimesTHE ROSENTHAL REVELATIONJEWS & THE NAACPThe Original Martin LutherCircumcision PhallusyLindbergh & DisneyKILLING KENNEDYSNIXON'S JEWISH PROBLEMJEW PORN INDUSTRYADL - ACLU - SPLCWho Said What About JewsChristian Zionism IdiocyThe Monsanto MonsterHISTORIC JEWISH EXPULSIONSWINSTON CHURCHILLJUSTICE FOR GERMANSGreatest Story Never ToldMEIN KAMPFJUSTICE FOR GERMANYTHE WORD NAZI ORIGINWHY GERMANS WERE ANGRYGerman American Bund 1930Russo-Jewish HistoryTHE BAD WARHELLSTORMThe French SS DivisionEisenhower Death CampsEinsatzgruppen TrialPATTON'S MURDERHaavara Transfer AgreementHOLOHOAX DEPROGRAMTHE HOLOCAUST LIESRemember Ernst ZundelMeet Germar RudolfMeet Ursula HaverbeckCODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust)FREE MONIKA SCHAEFERThe ANNE FRANK FRAUDAUSCHWITZHolocaust Lies SitesTHE DRESDEN HOLOCAUSTTHE HOLODOMOR TRUTHIF AMERICANS KNEWRequired Reading on JEWSInstitute for Historical ReviewCHRISTOGENEA PROJECTSTOP THE CRIME SITEPATRICK LITTLEJohn KaminskiSTORMFRONTDr. David DukeDr. Kevin MacDonaldDr. William PierceVIDEO REBEL'S BLOGCitizens American PartySMOLOKO.COMJEW WATCHVOICE OF EUROPEThe Anti-New York TimesTHIS IS EUROPARENEGADE BROADCASTINGNo Time For SilenceTHE UGLY TRUTHINCONVENIENT HISTORYREAL HISTORY CHANNELEuroFolkRadio.comREBEKAH ROTHBrother NathanaelLASHA DARKMOONTHE WHITE RESISTERKen O'Keefe Speaks OutANTI ZIONIST LEAGUEFuhrerious 88 SiteJEW WORLD ORDERNWO OBSERVERRENEGADE TRIBUNELINKS DeLUXMEME COLLECTIONTOWARD THE UNKNOWNA Letter To Americans

 

 Zionist vs. Jew

 

The real Holocaust is what 

Jews have done to the world

 

 


By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://johnkaminski.org

 

 

Because Jews own most media worldwide, there simply is no noticeable discussion on a mainstream level of their role in the wars and upheavals of society. How many famous commentators or legislators wouldn’t mention them on a bet? From the volcanic time bomb ticking in Hawaii to America’s unsavory string of criminal wars against mostly defenseless countries, Jews are the deliberately ignored factor without which none of these puzzling disasters can be adequately understood or solved.


The salient issue of the U.S. war against Syria that is almost never discussed in mainstream circles are the significant oil deposits in the Golan Heights which Israel, with America’s approval, has stolen. As they did with Al-Qaeda, the U.S. and Israel simply invented an enemy called ISIS which gave them the contrived media-assisted rationale to wage war against innocent victim Syria.


And now in London a forthright ex-soldier — Jez Turner — has accurately described British history as totally dominated by Jews, and for this, was sentenced by a court to a year in jail for simply mentioning an accurate historical fact — that the country has been totally controlled by Jews since the 17th century. The sinister City of London fortress and Britain’s corrupt monarchy provide ample evidence of this.


A new clampdown on the use of the word Jew in public utterances is spreading like malignant mold in the minds of men. Say anything negative about Jews and likely you’ll be going to jail, or, at least you can count on Jews trying to put you in jail. And given the Jewish predilection for controlling the legal system, there’s a very good chance they’ll succeed.


The missing link in the 9/11 probe


Seventeen years of palaver about the 9/11 caper has resulted in absolutely zero progress in identifying and apprehending the perpetrators of the greatest crime in American history. The missing piece is clearly Jewish involvement, which is neatly kept in the shadows by Jewish media, and enforced by a U.S. government totally controlled by Jews.


Now we have a movement revealed by South Carolina’s new law which makes it a crime to criticize Israel. This is the real battle of anti-Semitism. The stakes are that Jews can get away with any crime they commit because they can hide behind the shibboleth that criticism of Jews is a crime in and of itself — the dreaded anti-Semitism.


And what crimes are those? Well, that’s quite a list! Start with both World Wars, the demolition of the World Trade Center, the Federal Reserve, this whole string of faux terror incidents usually involving schoolchildren, the poisoning of the food supply and the hidden timebombs in medicines, the centuries old fractional reserve lending scams culminating in the derivatives boondoggle guaranteed to crash the world economy almost immediately if not sooner, the total pollution of culture by the destruction of religious systems, and a family-fracturing legalization of homosexuality that resulted in a form of self-destructive insanity being ordered by a totalitarian government.


Jews have turned our daughters into whores and our sons into conscienceless swindlers.


In the dreary days of 2018, integrity can nowhere be found in public organizations, only rapacity and love of money. This is the true legacy of the Jews.


We’ve come around this bend before, back in the days of George Bush 2 and his flunkie general Colin Powell. They tried to insist it was both logical and sane to conflate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism. Back then (not so long ago, 2004) they were pretty much laughed out of the room. But the mindlock has seriously intensified since then. You may not speak ill of Israel, and you may not use the world Jew in a negative context, or you will be stripped of all your possessions and sent to jail, often without a trial, by Jewish judges and lawyers.


No more talking about Israeli soldiers shooting Palestinian children in the head so their organs can be transplanted in palsied old Jews.


This is the new kosher totalitarianism that has the world in its death grip as it crushes the minds of the people forced against their better nature to believe facts that are demonstrably false.


Is the sabotage deliberate?


With any public debate you have saboteurs who appear to be on one side but who are actually on the other. Which side you’re on, of course, depends upon what you believe, and it’s safe to say that most of the people in the world have been badly educated, thanks to Jewish manipulators, about the forces that control their lives.


I was really disappointed in late May 2018 when a man who knows better, Mike Walsh, advocated the use of the word Zionist instead of the term Jew when assigning blame for most of the troubles of the world. This is a battle I have been fighting for most of the last decade, and many other freedom fighter heroes have been involved for much longer than that.


Walsh was commenting on the surprise jailing of British activist Jez Turner. Walsh blamed Turner’s incarceration on the fact that he used the term Jew instead of the less-toxic label Zionist. Thus, Walsh joins questionable media characters such as Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, Les Visible (a Jew) and David ‘Rothschild Zionism’ Icke as pretend Jew critics who are actually helping to conceal the Jewish role in today’s atrocity avalanche by using such distracting synonyms as Zionist, Communist and other ‘progressive’  labels. They’re all Jews or Jew wannabes, quite fond of the kosher contributions they may or may not receive. By confusing the public they are assisting Jew criminals to remain anonymous, to remain beyond the consciousness of most Americans who think its the U.S. government that is being so cruel toward them, when it’s really the Jewish puppetmasters who control everything from behind the scenes.


Advocating use of the term Zionism lets those Jews seeking to avoid exposure to non Jews off the hook and betrays all those activists who have put their lives (and their freedom) on the line by opposing the Jewish menace and their kosher lies about history (6 million et al) by speaking directly about them, and not using some smarmy synonym to protect themselves from Jewish wrath.


In 1921, the great Henry Ford had a rule about what to call Jews that everyone would do well to follow.


Name the enemy


The system of Jewish procedure is already fully known. How simple it is! First, you secularize the public schools — “secularize” is the precise word the Jews use for the process. You prepare the mind of the public school child by enforcing the rule that no mention shall ever be made to indicate that culture or patriotism is in any way connected with the deeper principles of the Anglo-Saxon religion. Keep it out, every sight and sound of it! Keep out also every word that will aid any child to identify the Jewish race. Then, when you have thus prepared the soil, you can go into the universities and colleges and enter upon the double program of pouring contempt on all the Anglo-Saxon landmarks, at the same time filling the void with Jewish revolutionary ideas.


Ford spotlighted the necessity of teaching students that the major force attacking America was Jewish.


It is against this that the Jews protest. “You must not identify us,” they say, “You must not use the term ‘Jew’.” Why? Because unless the Jewish idea can creep in under the assumption of other than Jewish origin, it is doomed. Anglo-Saxon ideas dare proclaim themselves and their origin.


The Jews, as the world is beginning to learn, hide their deepest thoughts behind false stories in dark places.


The only aliens on this planet are the Jews, which is why they encourage all this prattling about ET this and extra dimensional that. Their twisted holy book, the Talmud, insists that Jews are the only real humans, and that everybody else on this planet is merely a farm animal, a slave to be used by the Jews for any purpose.


Are we going to forgive the presence of the Talmud, the most egregious hate crime in human history which describes how the Jews may rob and kill anyone they want with no penalty because the rest of the non-Jewish humans are nothing more than cattle — some Jews say cockroaches — to be fleeced and slaughtered upon the twisted whims of very sick people.


You may say this is wishful thinking or conspiracy mongering, but I would say it’s right in line with historical precedent set by the Jews in Russia with their hundred million non-Jewish deaths, or in Germany which they totally destroyed because they weren’t allowed to keep Berlin as the smut capital of the world, or in Japan, which they once lured into a World War by cutting off their supply of gasoline in order to pulverize them later on with what Eustace Mullins called “the Jewish hell bomb”.


The current destruction of Europe is a totally Jewish operation and all the timid politicians and writers are afraid to mention it lest they lose all their bribe money, or their paychecks from Jewish media giants.


But now it’s against the law to mention any of these colossal crimes because it would be anti-Semitic. Out freedom of speech has been terminated by these kosher crackpots. This indeed is the new totalitarianism, and it is totally Jewish.


You want to call them Zionists. Go ahead. The Jews will thank you for it. I call them Jews and say before God that they are the scourge of the world.




John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail:

 

6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

http://johnkaminski.org

http://johnkaminski.info/

http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html

http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 


Let's Call Jews 'Jews', and Not Use Silly Euphemisms Like 'Globalist'

"They clearly show that you are afraid to write the J word. And they know how to deal with frightened persons."

  

The original title of this article was: 'The "Globalists" Love Gefilte Fish'. The author is Jewish.

 

 


 

 

Our grandparents faced a quandary when they had to describe some body parts or physical activity. The ‘obscene words’ remained taboo at least until D.H. Lawrence broke the prohibition in Lady Chatterley’s Lover, and the four-letter words became printable only recently. However, now we have new banned words, or words one can use only at one’s own peril.

 

A globalist house pet
 

‘The Jews’ is such a word. Speaking about the Jews is fraught with consequences. Jews do not like to be referred to, unless in extremely flattering terms. You are likely to be banned in Facebook and other social networks for referring to ‘Jews’. You can be fired. Even a hundred years ago it was a troublesome step, likely to cause social ostracism.

 

Therefore, there is a permanent demand for euphemisms.
 
  • “Semite” is an early and enduring euphemism of the 19th century which is still with us thanks to “anti-Semitism”.


  • The Clergy prefer to write ‘Masons’ instead of ‘Jews’.


  • ‘Khazar’ or ‘Khazarian’ is popular in the networks, thanks to Arthur Koestler, the author of The Thirteenth Tribe. He claimed modern Jews were the descendants of the Turkic Khazars who were Judaised in 12th century.


  • The nickname ‘Ashkenazi’ originally referred to the Jews of Central Europe; the East European Jews of Lithuanian and Ukrainian origin gladly accepted it despite the German Jews’ objections. Nowadays it is just an euphemism for a Jew, with an extra bonus: not-very-prominent (outside trade and money) Oriental Jews will gladly join in Ashkenazi denunciation.

  • ‘Zionist’ is a popular term of use and abuse, as in “Jews are fine, it is Zionists whom I dislike”.

  • “Reptilian” or ‘Illuminati’ are the words used when all the rest fail.


There is one big problem with these words. They clearly show that you are afraid to write the J word. And they know how to deal with frightened persons. It is enough to murmur in response, “It’s an antisemitic slur”, and the guy will collapse in a paroxysm of denial. There is a second problem: it makes very little sense to call the Bolshevik Jews “Zionists.”

 

 

The Jews themselves have proposed a few euphemisms of their own: ‘Hebrews’ or ‘Israelites’ were the preferred ones, but they didn’t make much inroad in the English-speaking world. However, ‘Hebrews’ became the official designation of Jews in Russia, while the ‘Jews’ moniker had been outlawed, though it survived in Poland and the Ukraine.

Now the US has produced a new word: “globalists.” The Huffington Post called the tweet of Donald Trump about the dismissal of “globalist Gary Cohen” – anti-Semitic. It turns out that a “globalist” is just a Jew. For example, globalists like gefilte fish.
 

This neologism pleased Ann Coulter, and she amused her numerous readers with her tweets: “Paul Newman is only half globalist,” “How many globalists came under the distribution in the fight against male assault and harassment!”, “Israel is the last refuge of globalists.” These Tweets received thousands of likes and reposts, and caused an angry condemnation … of globalists.

 

Mahmud Abbas, the president of Palestine, created an euphemism accidentally. He called the US Ambassador to Israel a “son of a bitch”, and His Excellence Right Honourable Ambassador David Friedman said it is was an “antisemitic slur”.

 

A propos, the creation of euphemisms is a very Jewish way to deal with taboos. At first, the Jews banned the Name of God יהוה, and then they banned the substitute, and the substitute of the substitute, and the substitute of the substitute of the substitute. Nowadays, the religious Jews refer to ‘God’ in writing in an oblique way.

 

The whole of political correctness (PC) grew out of extrapolating this Jewish attitude to other groups. In the PC culture, the word ‘Negro’ was displaced by “Black”, and then by ‘black’ in low case, and then by “Afro-American”. Thus PC had created a new fence around the ban.

 

The idea of fences is another Jewish concept. A Jew is forbidden to pick fruit on the Sabbath. Fine! Then, the Jews created a fence around this prohibition forbidding the climbing of an apple tree on the Sabbath. The idea is: if you climb on an apple tree, you may be tempted to pick an apple. And then they built another fence, forbidding the climbing of any tree one the Sabbath. Otherwise, you’ll get used to climbing a pine on the Sabbath, and one day you’ll climb an apple tree.
 

PC is this additional fence. If today you refer to a black person, tomorrow you will be tempted to refer to Jews. And if you refer to Jews, perhaps you will do so in unflattering terms. The concept of micro-insults and micro-aggressions completes the fence.

 

And now we have a new fence: a reference to ‘bankers’, ‘moneylenders’ and even ‘globalists’ has become forbidden, as in the case of George Soros. The Hungarians referred to him as a “globalist banker” and the Jewish world rushed to his defense. Not that he is liked by his fellow Jews, he isn’t, but they have to fight the breach in the fence. You know the logic: today you call Soros ‘’a globalist’, and tomorrow you will call a Jew – a Jew.

 

President Putin did just that. In an interview with Megyn Kelly, he answered her question about the 13 Russians who were indicted by Mueller for alleged interference in the elections: “They do not represent the interests of the Russian state. Maybe they are not Russians, but Ukrainians, Tatars, Jews with Russian citizenship. Check it out.”

 

He was attacked ferociously. The leading Jewish organization ADL (Anti-Defamation League) referred to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (this is their standard response whenever a Jew is mentioned), and added, “Don’t you dare blame the Jews for interfering in American elections!”

This is especially piquant – if there is a foreign country that actively interferes in the US politics and elections, it is primarily the Jewish state and its supporters. American friends of Israel, Sheldon Adelson and Jeff Katzenberg are the largest donors; and in general Jews spent more money on presidential elections in the US than on helping needy Jews. Israeli diplomats are actively interfering in American elections at all levels, as the Jewish website Mondoweiss writes. But you can mention that only in marginal publications on the verge of a ban from Google and Twitter.
 

And in Israel, the energetic young MK Xenia Svetlova, (a Knesset Member for the Zionist Union), accused Putin of anti-Semitism and called upon Netanyahu to ‘protect the Jews’. It’s nothing personal – Xenia grew up in Moscow, worked for Russian TV channels, even loved Russia, but when she went into politics, she had to prove that she was not a Putin stooge. And she calls for Israeli intervention in Syria against Assad and Putin, and for the condemnation of Putin’s anti-Semitism.

 

 

The Tatars and Ukrainians did not resent Putin’s words. The Russian Jews in Russia dismissed it, too. For a good reason: the taboo on the word ‘Jew’ is not universal. It does not exist in Russia. Russia is the land of many native ethnicities, a hundred and fifty or so, from Yakut to Mordva, and people freely refer to all of them without fear. The Jews in Russia are just another ethnicity, or ethnos, or nation, one of many. ‘Russians’ in Russia connote members of Russian ethnicity, the most numerous nation of the Russian Federation, not the citizens of Russia, as you would expect.

 

This attitude may surprise an American, or a Frenchman. It is not totally unknown in Europe, where Walloons and Flemings populate Belgium, and Catalans and Basques live in Spain. Still, a Frenchman of Brittany or Provence is a Frenchman first, and a Breton or Provençal a distant second. In the US, ‘ethnicity’ is a domain of recent immigrants, Greeks or Poles; the Americans have race and religion as identity-forming factors.

 

In Russia the ethnic identity has been enforced since Stalin’s days: it was actually recorded on the ID. I explain this by Stalin’s personal perceptions: a native of Georgia, the country in Transcaucasia, he was brought up in the local tradition of ethnic awareness. For Russians proper, this ethnic identity is of little importance. They know of it, but do not consider it greatly important. That is why in modern Russia ‘ethnicity’ is not registered on the ID anymore.
 

Of course, Megyn Kelly, while referring to ‘Russians’ indicted by Mueller, had meant ‘citizens of Russia’, and not ‘ethnic Russians’. Me myself, like the majority of old émigrés, also refer to “Russians” meaning people in Russia or from Russia, or even people from the former Soviet Union. In Israel, every person whose origins are in the USSR is called ‘Russian’, to the chagrin of Russian Jews. They would like to be called ‘Jews’ in Israel, and ‘Russians’ in Russia, but alas, it is other way around, they are called ‘Jews’ in Russia and ‘Russians’ in Israel.

 

Russian ethnic nationalists of the kind embraced by my colleague Anatoly Karlin would like to keep the ethnonym ‘Russians’ just for themselves, but they are harmless, you can disregard their whines – they aren’t globalists for you.

 

Now, for the first time ever, the Russians are being trained to stick to American word usage. This is done by Facebook, a platform that millions of Russians use. Besides opening Russia for American business and stealing its data, Facebook is a powerful enforcer of PC in Russian minds. Whenever you refer to blacks, Jews, or even Ukrainians you risk being banned for a week or a month.

 

As unusual this attitude is for the Russians, they are susceptible for training, as we all are. These small punishments go a long way to bring Jewish hegemony to Russia. Beside protecting Jews, or Blacks from micro-insults, the banning of words has a powerful impact on the mind. Whoever tells you what you may or may not say, is a person of authority. This way of subduing people to your command is called Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), and the CIA is on the forefront of using this black magic of words.

 

Israelis, and Jews in general do not accept these taboos. It is perfectly all right for Israelis and Jews to refer to ‘Jews’, or worse. The late Israeli MK Ze’evi, a popular right-winger minister, called Martin Indyk, the US Ambassador in Israel, a ‘Jewboy” (יהודון); Netanyahu’s aide called another US Ambassador a ‘Jewboy’, too. Israelis speak freely of blacks; they do not speak only, but deport them as well. They do not mind banning non-Jews from renting apartments quite openly, too. This disregard of taboo gives Jews an additional power in dealing with Gentiles, like a disregard of the Matrix gave supernatural powers to Neo.

 

The Palestinians disregard the taboo, too. They do not hesitate shouting “Jews are coming”, when Israeli soldiers on their jeeps roll into their villages. Americans of Palestinian origin are scrupulous with their observance, they never utter the forbidden J-word, (unless they want to say something nice about a Jewish friend), otherwise they speak of ‘Zionists’. That is why Palestinians in Palestine are free, and Palestinians in the US are not, like all Americans.

 

This taboo should be broken. Until it is done, the Jews will continue to dominate the discourse and the US society, the Palestinians will suffer, the bankers will grow fat and prosperous, legal and illegal immigration will continue unabated.

 

Saying “Jew” will have a liberating effect, like mouthing the name of Rumpelstiltskin. And it is much shorter.

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Click on this text to visit the RUSSIA INSIDER website...

 

 

 

 

                                          It's Time to Drop the Jew Taboo

It's making serious discussion of Russian geopolitics and history next to impossible





The paintings used as illustrations in this article are taken from the website of Ilya Glazunov and can be seen full-size in HD here and here. Russia Insider published a long profile of him and his work in 2016. Much of his work, both paintings and books, dealt extensively with the Jewish role in Russian history.

 


 

smashing_of_the_church_at_easter_night_ilya_glazunov.png

A Jewish bolshevik disrupting an Easter midnight service. Detail from a larger monumental painting by Ilya Glazunov.
 
 
 

 

1. Introduction

Most people know about, but few are willing to condemn, the strict taboo in the media, of criticizing Jews as a group, using that term. One cannot even criticize a small subsection of Jews, a miniscule percentage of the Jewish population, even when they richly deserve it.

 

Obviously, this is a ridiculous way to run a publication whose object is to get to the truth, so I am writing this to explain why, from now on, the pages of Russia Insider will be open to articles which fairly and honestly address the influence of Jewish elites, including pointing out when it is malevolent, which it often is, and try to understand it and explain it, with malice towards none.

 

I have become convinced that unless we break this taboo, nothing will improve in the human catastrophe unfolding in geopolitics. Millions have died over the past 30 years, and if we want it to stop, and to avoid a cataclysm which seems to approach inexorably, we have to have the freedom to criticize those responsible. It is very clear to me, as it is to many others, that much of the guilt for this comes from Jewish pressure groups, particularly in the media.

 

mon_001_jpg_2000x1015_.png

A detail from the monumental painting 'The Great Experiment' (1990) which has many references to the Jewish role in the Russian Revolution
 
 

I can see as an editor, that much of what is written about geopolitics in the ‘public square’, admirable thought it may be in other respects, makes itself irrelevant by tiptoeing around this crucial issue.

 

I am a newcomer to the media world, unexpectedly thrust three years ago into the role of owner, publisher and editor of this fairly widely read publication. We get about 10 million visits per month across all of our platforms from a sophisticated audience, and we are widely followed by so- called 'influencers'. We've made a big mark in a short time, and we did it by saying what others were not willing to say. Many subjects which we were the first to speak about on a major platform have now entered the mainstream.

 

Russia Insider is a grassroots phenomenon, and sometimes resembles a political movement as much as it does a publication. We exist solely because of small donations from readers. We get no funding from major donors, not to mention governments, foundations, or other organized groups. It is all private individuals. Our single largest donation over the past year was $5000, and the median gift is $30. We raised about $80,000 last year. This gives us the freedom to pretty much say what we want, something that can be said of very few publications, even in the alternative media space, most of whom are beholden to large donors.

 

I see everyday how one can influence the public agenda by addressing or ignoring certain topics. One really can make a difference, and I have tried to have a positive impact, as I understand it. It has been a remarkable education in the power of the media, even of our relatively small Russia Insider.

 

But this taboo is the great exception. It really is quite extraordinary, to realize that you can publish about just about anything, except that. As I said, just about everyone knows about the taboo, and I did too in my previous career in business, but it is another thing altogether to enforce it, which I felt, until recently, compelled to do, and to have your nose rubbed in it every day when trying to make sense of world events.

 

2. The euphemisms

 

Some try to skirt the taboo with euphemisms. A veritable cottage industry has emerged inventing ever new ones, indeed, this is the new trend in the alt-media. We hear a lot about 'Zionists', 'elites', 'global elites', 'globalists', 'neocons', 'liberal interventionists', 'the war party', 'the Israel lobby', 'the deep state', 'bankers', 'new world order' (I never understood what that is actually), 'Bilderbergers' - sounds like a nice man from a central-European fairytale. My friend the Saker goes with 'Anglozionists'.

 

But none of these terms work, do they? They all obscure the issue, actually enhancing the taboo’s inherent deceit.

 

Zionists? Really? I've never heard anyone describe themselves this way, or even other people describe them - 'Have you meet Max?, he's an enthusiastic Zionist!' I've never seen it mentioned as an interest in a social media profile (perhaps Facebook should include it as an Emoticon). Maybe Rachel Maddow IS a Zionist, what do I know, although as far as I understand, Zionism was a political movement that lost its urgency once the state of Israel was well on its merry way. Elites? Well, no, I would reckon many Jews are elites, but more Jews are not, and more elites are non- Jews, so no, that doesn't work. Well, you get the idea. These are attempts to slip past the ever-zealous censor, and they serve to maintain the confusion and deception.

 

No, the only trait that these people have in common, is their Jewish heritage. Some are liberals, some are conservatives. Some are religious, some are not. Some are mixed Jewish heritage, some are not. Some care about Israel, some do not. Some support Israel others criticize her. They are politicians, journalists, academics, comedians, actors, or, businessmen. Some stem from Western Europe, others from Eastern Europe, and others from the Middle East.

 

 

3. Hostility to Putin's Russia is largely a Jewish phenomenon

 

Russia Insider's mission is to explain and describe Russia and her role in the world. As soon as you begin to drill into how other nations relate to Russia, and Russian history, it becomes obvious that the unreasonable hostility towards Putin's Russia, particularly coming from the US and the UK, is very much a Jewish phenomenon, and has been for centuries.

 

And yes, 'Jewish' is the only term that accurately describes it, and not one of the many euphemisms we frequently see used.

 

The most vitriolic and obsessive Russia-bashing journalists in the media are mostly Jewish. The publications which push these writers most energetically are ALL Jewish-owned, and as a publisher, I know very well, that is where the buck stops.

 

On the policy side, the neo-conservative movement, Russia's harshest foe, was conceived of, is led by, and consists mostly of, Jews. And their trouble-making extends far beyond Russia - they are responsible for America's disastrous debacle in the Middle East over the last 20 years - where their crimes have been stymied by precisely one country - Russia. The psychotically anti-Russian recent UN ambassadors, Nikki Haley and Samantha Power, were put there by the Israel lobby, and given an independent brief, in other words, they answer not to their presidents, rather to their Jewish sponsors.

 

In Congress the biggest Russia-Gate tub-thumpers are noticeably Jewish - Schiff, Schumer, Cardin, Blumenthal, Franken (although not as overwhelmingly as in the media). The Israel lobby routinely enforces legislation hostile to Russia. Bill Browder with his Magnitsky Sanctions - is Jewish.

 

 

4. The media

 

But let's talk about the media - for this is where the real power lies. All other levers and branches of government pale in comparison when it comes to real political influence.

 

The two leading newspapers of the land, the New York Times and The Washington Post, both very Jewish in ownership, editors, and staff, have been waging an all-out jihad against Putin's Russia, and are guilty of the most grotesque dishonesty, slander and journalistic malpractice - exhaustively catalogued by one of the most authoritative and admired veteran journalists in America, Robert Parry, winner of the Polk award among other accolades. You can see an archive of his extraordinary work criticizing these two publications, particularly in relation to Russia, here.

 

PBS, with its lily-white image as purveyor of Masterpiece Theater and other highbrow offerings, is wholly dependent on donations from wealthy Jews. Like some Gentile starlet submitting to Harvey Weinstein, that station has allowed itself to be used, churning out a relentless stream of the most ridiculous anti-Putin propaganda that would be funny if it wasn't so effective among the gray-haired, non-flyover denizens of America, and their deep pocketbooks. CNN, a deeply Jewish company, has been pushing Russiagate like a religion, to the point to where their brand has suffered severe damage.

 

Rachel Maddow, the nation's most popular and influential liberal political show host is Jewish. She has gone so overboard demonizing Russia and pushing Russiagate that she has become a figure of fun. On the print side, the list is the same - the ones shrieking the loudest are mostly Jews, and disproportionately female - and there is an important lesson there too - Masha Gessen, Anne Applebaum, and Julia loffe, to name a few.

 

The refrain from the male chorus is no less strident. David Remnick, David Frum, Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer. Even comedy news hates Russia - John Oliver, Jon Stewart (previously), Bill Maher, all Jews, go to great efforts to convince Americans that Putin's Russia is, quite literally, - and this term is frequently used - 'Hitlerian.'

 

Jewish-owned high brow magazines have been leading the charge against Putin - the Newhouse's New Yorker, the NY Review of Books (the management of this venerable magazine is obsessed with the subject). The New Republic, Newsweek, The Atlantic, and the Rothschild-owned Economist pump out story after story full of what can only be called lies, in a massive campaign to demonize Russia and Putin.

 

Timothy Snyder, the Yale historian, and Michael Weiss, the neocon firebrand whose website, The Interpreter,  is funded by the exiled Jewish oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, are two more prominent figures in this phenomenon.

 

The Economist deserves special mention with Ed Lucas leading the charge (previously), (he is the great nephew of Charles Portal, a Jewish air marshal in Britain who was a relentless proponent of fire-bombing German civilians and is thought to be behind the burning of Dresden). Equally vitriolic are the writings of Ben Judah and his father, Tim.

 

But to draw attention to all this, or to investigate whether there is something about their Jewishness that makes them so hostile to Russia, is simply, verboten. Inevitably, when I point out this overwhelming ethnic imbalance, people say, well what about the many critics of the hostility to Russia who are Jewish? – the eminently admirable Glenn Greenwald is a prominent example, and there are many others. The answer is, that the exception to a trend doesn’t disprove it, and can often serve to mask it.

 

 

5. A de facto violation of free speech

 

The truth is, that in a nation which frantically pats itself on the shoulder for enshrining ‘free speech’ in its national credo, and ceaselessly lectures others on the subject with pompous sanctimony, speech is not de facto free on this crucial and world-threatening subject, a remarkable, and dangerous, state of affairs. I will not be clapped into prison for publishing this article, but the taboo works like a charm to keep the topic out of public discussion. Who needs repressive laws when you can con people into censoring themselves? In Germany, the dominant power in Europe, and in other European countries, I could be locked up for it – another shocking thought, for this son of Germany.

 

The Jewish dominance of the Russia-bashing phenomenon is far more extensive than I can convey in a couple of short paragraphs, and I urge someone to do this in a more systematic way. I will be happy to publish it.

 

6. Shutting down an honest examination of Russian history

 

One of the most spectacular aspects of the taboo is how it whitewashes one of the most extraordinary events in the history of mankind, the Russian revolution.

 

Many White Russians fleeing the revolution believed that it was mostly a Jewish coup d’etat, financed by wealthy bankers in New York and London who were sworn enemies of Christian Tsarism. Indeed there is strong evidence to suggest that this is true. This view argues that the terror visited on Russia during the civil war and its aftermath, continuing well into the Stalin years, for he could not really control it either, was a Jewish one. Cursory evidence also suggests that this is so, if only because so much of the Bolshevik leadership was Jewish, in particular, Trotsky, but also many other vicious personalities, especially in the secret police which so terrorized the Russian people.

 

Henry Ford was heavily influenced by this view, which he heard from Russian emigres, augmenting his anti-semitism, and it has been well-documented by liberal mainstream historians that the German National Socialist movement became radically more anti-semitic in reaction to this interpretation, which they adopted, strongly influenced by an influx of White Russians finding refuge in Europe. But one doesn’t hear a whisper about all this in mainstream historical articles, even to debunk it, presumably because someone might have their ‘feelings’ hurt.

 

This all reverberates to this day. The virulent and entrenched anti-semitism in today’s Ukraine is a direct heir of this White Russian view. This is because the Nazis had long-standing subversive programs implemented by their White Russian allies inside Ukraine and the Baltics, which were heavily German in ethnicity. The famines of the 30s increased the sentiment. When Hitler invaded this work paid off magnificently, and Western Ukraine enthusiastically welcomed him and fought with his armies, as did many in the Baltics. After the war, German intelligence, in return for clemency, traded this network to the CIA, which continued the program to destabilize the USSR, and these programs, representing significant financial and institutional support continued right through the cold war, and into the present day.

 

What happened in 2014 in the Ukraine had a 100 year provenance, and is inextricably linked to alleged Jewish culpability for the revolution. But for all the gallons of ink spilt about the events of 2014, this crucial background is left laregly undiscussed, even in the alternative media (I of all people, can attest to this).

 

Such is the reach and devastating effect of this taboo.

 

The enormity of the omission is mind-boggling. The suffering of the Russian people in the decades after the revolution was extraordinary – and here there is little agreement – modern revisionists insist that the revolution and its aftermath claimed perhaps 2 million victims, others say it reached into the 10s of millions. And it is not just the number of people, but the way it was carried out – families ripped apart, fathers hauled off in the middle of the night, churches blown up, priests tortured and subjected to ritual murder, phony confessions beaten out of innocents, summary executions without trial, an enforced culture of snitching, millions sent to slave labor camps – a nation was held in terror for decades, traumatized to this day. If there is even the slightest suspicion that this was in essence, a Jewish pogrom against ethnic Russians, surely it deserves some public examination.

 

But no, it seems people think observing the taboo is more important.

 

We try on Russia Insider to give exposure to this view of events, which I believe deserves a hearing – I am not enough of an expert to say whether it is correct - but so effective is the taboo, that there is little of quality available. There is a very substantial body of work available about this in Russian, most of it written since the fall of Communism, - in contrast to the West, this is a widely discussed view inside Russia – so the heavy lifting has been done – it just needs to be rendered into English.

 

 

7. The best alt-media journalists are neutered

 

One of the things we do at RI is to scan the alternative media for what we think are the best articles about Russia, and republish them with a link to the original. We also keep an eye on what we think are the most dishonest articles - and critique them, and it is this comprehensive surveying of the writers and the publications that gives me such a strong understanding of the Jewishness of the hostility. The casual reader’s awareness of it may be anecdotal – I can assure you, it is more pronounced than people realize. When you read, catalog, analyze, track, and critique this river of thought 8 hours a day it becomes starkly obvious.

 

I am routinely and happily amazed by the fantastic writing about Russia, left, right, and center, in the alternative media, which comes from a most impressive cast of characters, the bulk of it about geopolitics. The intellectual heft and scholarship is extraordinary. Borrowing from this brilliance, we put out a deeper and more thorough analysis of things Russia-related than news organizations with 20 times our budget.

 

Some of these men are true heroes, speaking truth to power, fighting back against a system gone horribly wrong, brave, selfless, often sacrificing career and financial well-being - but there is one line they won't cross.

 

 

8. Much of what is written about Russian relations and history becomes meaningless and deceptive

 

Sadly, a lot of what they write, is, meaningless, and almost amounts to professional malpractice, because the Jewish push for confrontation with Russia is, by far, the most significant factor. Excluding it from a discussion of geopolitics is ignoring the elephant, not in the corner, rather the one dancing a Mazurka in the middle of the room. We should not forget that willful omission is a species of lying, and is recognized as such in a court of law, and this case is no different.

 

The omission is misleading, and sows endless confusion, for it compels writers to place blame where it does not really belong - the list of culprits is endless: 'Democrats', Liberals', sometimes it is 'America did this', or 'Americans did that', or it is Trump, or Obama, or Hillary, or Rex Tillerson, or John McCain, or 'the Military Industrial Complex, the Deep State, the Intelligence Community, and on and on. Yes, these individuals are complicit, (except ‘America’, it is a ridiculous notion that we 350 million souls collectively agree on anything) but it is not their spineless treachery that is of prime importance, rather the powerful Jews in American politics and media who so easily compel them to dance to their tune.

 

 

9. A lesson in relevance from the Alt-Right

 

The Alt-Right is helpful in understanding Russia, because it has intellectual heft, and produces a lot of good writing about Russia and Russian relations, much of which is spot-on. We follow the Alt-Right media and republish the occasional article, and they are invariably very popular on Russia Insider – largely, I think, because they are offering a fresh point of view, and talking about vitally important issues others refuse to address.

 

The Alt-Right is a youth movement. Its leaders are mostly in their 30s, and the rank and file, which is large indeed, running, by some estimates, into the 10s of millions globally, seems to mostly range from mid- teens to mid 20s. Much of the Alt-Right has completely discarded this taboo and revels in flouting it, indeed, trampling on it, as is the wont of young people regarding the more tedious and preposterous conventions of every era.

 

It is axiomatic, I think, that one way youth benefits society, is that they question what the old men are saying, - shake things up a bit, make them examine their assumptions. It is no coincidence that in the Emperor With No Clothes children’s story, it is a child who points out the obvious, what the adults are so desperately pretending not to see, because it will impair their material well-being.

 

Pointing out the pernicious effects of the influence of certain Jewish elites on many aspects of American and European society and politics, as the Alt-Right does, greatly assists in understanding how politics really work.

 

If you doubt this, then I highly recommend that you listen to a couple of episodes of the most popular Alt-Right podcasts, like Fash the Nation, or Richard Spencer’s Alt-Right Politics, easily accessible by smartphone. The Fash the Nation hosts are two Beltway policy wonks who sound like they are in their late 20s or early 30s, who spend a couple hours each week talking politics. In their analysis, when relevant, and not over-stating it, they point out when Jewish interests are at play, when politicians, journalists, lobbyists, publishers, publications, foundations, or their main funders, allies, spouses, and backers, are Jewish. The gang at Alt-Right Politics does the same. It becomes very clear what is intuitively obvious - that blotting out any mention of this hampers any serious discussion.

 

(For Fash the Nation, I recommend episodes with Marcus Halberstram, like this one, and for Alt Right Politics, the year-in-review episode was a good one. The Fash the Nation hosts use obscenity on their show, which unfortunately detracts from their credibility, but don't be put off by it, put it up to youthful ignorance - they are worth listening to.)

 

By blowing up this taboo, the Alt-Right is making itself relevant, and those who cling to it, irrelevant. A taboo only works if it is universally observed - if a sizable number of people begin ignoring it, everyone else begins to look increasingly ridiculous. Liberals spend an inordinate amount of time wringing their hands about the Alt-Right. By refusing to openly and fairly discuss Jewish influence, they are handing them a powerful competitive advantage.

 

The Alt-Right is doing society a service by addressing an issue that urgently needs sunlight, and by providing an eco-system of websites and podcasts where authors can be published and critiqued, and points argued back and forth. Much of the discussion of Jewish influence in the Alt-Right is very scholarly, fair and balanced, i.e. the work of Kevin MacDonald or Michael Hoffman.

 

I believe the Alt-Right will continue to gain traction, simply because they intelligently discuss two sacred cows – the Jewish Question, and, closely linked to it, racial equality in terms of abilities, and the desirability of mixed-race societies. As long as they are addressing these two crucial issues, and no one else is, they will grow.

 

 

10. Malice towards none

 

Another pernicious effect of taboos is that they can lead to angry outbursts. When problems are not addressed, they tend to fester and worsen, until they become intolerable, and then there is sometimes a sudden and violent reaction. You can see this dynamic in the public discussion of the malevolent influence of Jewish elites. Some people, when they finally perceive its reach and harm, having been mislead by people they admired and trusted, lash out in anger – a common reaction when you find out you’ve been deceived about something vitally important. This, I believe, is another reason to be rid of this taboo as soon as possible – it has a way of making things worse.

 

Obviously, this discussion should be done without any hatred or anger to Jews as a whole. The Jews who are causing the trouble – the ones at the pinnacles of political and media power, are a small group indeed. Anyone who has grown up with and knows Jews well, as I have, knows that they are like people everywhere - basically decent, and this has been my overwhelming personal experience. It is their elite institutions that for some reason are clearly malevolent, and this demands public examination, not the least by Jews themselves.

 

What I am calling for is criticizing the elites who have given their nation a very bad name, and figuring out why this pattern repeats itself throughout history.

 

 

11. The problem extends to all areas of public life

 

The ongoing sex scandals which grace our front pages seem to provide an exclamation point to the phenomenon. Across the board, from Hollywood to entertainment to media to Washington, the poor sods being called out by the screeching harpy mob tend towards a certain ethnicity, not to mention the leading men in the spectacle. For all the talk and blather and belly button contemplation that the drama is evoking, no one, outside the Alt-Right, mentions this obvious fact, for it would be impolite.

 

The problem seems to arise when Jews get into positions of influence, i.e., when they join the dreaded 'elites'. Then, for some reason, regardless of their political sympathies or other particulars, they get up to no good - and something goes seriously wrong. Maybe the powerful Jewish institutions - the media, the banks, the movie studios, the music industry, etc, are in the hands of degenerates who demand bad behavior as the price of admission, and then enforce it. I really don't know, but obviously the question begs for examination, as the evidence does suggest that much of human enterprise dominated and shaped by Jews is a bottomless pit of trouble with a peculiar penchant for mendacity and cynicism, hostility to Christianity and Christian values, and in geopolitics, a clear bloodlust.

 

Hollywood and TV dramas? A completely Jewish-dominated industry, and a soulless spiral of depravity and cynicism, which only worsens with each passing year. Financial markets? - ditto - just watch the movies The Big Short or The Wolf of Wall Street for a particularly vivid illustration. Pop music and the rap nightmare? - ditto. The state of Israel and its treatment of the Palestinians? - more of the same. American foreign policy? - an unmitigated disaster which has murdered millions and squandered trillions over the last 30 years.

 

And I think 'murder' is the right word here -I think if you would ask the relatives of the 2 or so million Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians, Yemenis, East Ukrainians, or Serbs who died in the wars instigated by the largely Jewish- dictated US foreign policy over the past couple of decades, that they would back me up on that.

 

In each of these cases, one sees a tendency towards dishonesty. Indeed the whole 'Fake News' phenomenon, is fundamentally Jewish. It is the Jewish-owned American and European media which churn out an astonishing quantity of what can only be called lies.

 

 

12. We need serious scholarship and analysis

 

Yes, 1900 years after the exasperated Romans scattered the Hebrew tribes to the four winds, the 'JQ' is still a huge, messy, unsolved problem, and in our age, it is reaching yet another crisis. I can only speak with any expertise on a subject I know a lot about. Western foreign policy towards Russia, and Russian history, and the Jewish influence there is nothing short of an extinction-level threat to the entire planet. I am sure experts in Middle Eastern politics would confirm something similar.

 

All this needs scholarship and serious inquiry, to finally get to the bottom of this ongoing tragedy, a tragedy for both Jew and Gentile alike. Some writers have made important inroads, like Kevin MacDonald, but much more needs to be done to understand the problem.

 

One serious writer, Michael Hoffman, in his book Judaism's Strange Gods, argues the problem is with modern Judaism, which has changed radically from the religion of the Old Testament, effectively hijacked by various Jewish sects such as the New Testament era Pharisees who inspire misanthropic behavior among elites. I really can't say, but it is precisely this kind of inquiry which is needed to figure out, as our president likes to say 'what the hell is going on'.

 

 

13. Low expectations from the existing alt-media

 

I know that many writers and editors in the alt-media, and the alt-lite, privately agree with what I have written here, but we should not expect many of them to break the taboo anytime soon. The reason is that they mostly barely hang on financially, and often work for tiny wages, and any such change in editorial policy would knock out a certain part of their funding, (not to mention some of their better authors) making their financial situation untenable. Some are beholden to foundations or governments who would pull support. The needed intellectual work is going to be done on the few platforms whose support base will tolerate it – and this will mostly be on the Alt-Right, or publications that can buck the tide, like Russia Insider.

 

14. A call for articles and support

 

I met strong resistance to the ideas expressed here from colleagues, staff and columnists who contribute to RI. I've discussed it at length with many of them. Some of the best writers on the site, and some of the most articulate critics of America's inane policy towards Russia, are Jewish. Some agree with me privately, but say that to do so publicly would so damage their careers that they cannot. Some do not agree.

 

Russia Insider depends heavily on reader contributions, and I suppose this will curtail donations from some, so if you agree with this article, then now would be a good time to click on the donate button.

 

Discussion of the Jewish problem (and 'problem' is the right word here) is obviously not going to be the focus of Russia Insider - we try to be primarily about Russia, but I am willing to give space to this issue, and not just as it relates to Russia. I invite all writers, including from the Alt-Right, to get in touch with me directly at charles@russia-insider.com with article ideas, proposals, or anything else, and yes, we will publish articles which use (((echoes))).

 

It is my great regret that we are not in a position to pay authors for articles. If anyone reading this is in a position to help provide funding to pay writers on this important subject, that would be helpful, because it immediately raises the quality and depth of the writing. If you are interested, please get in touch with me directly.

 

At the end of the day, I don't care whether other people agree with me on this or not, whether I lose or gain authors or donations, traffic or influence, or whether the big tech platforms try to hush us up (they are already actively doing so). I started this site in the Fall of 2014 to call out a terrible crime, a whopping lie being told, by the media, most vociferously by Jews in very influential Jewish-owned publications, (Andrew Kramer and  the editorial board of the New York Times being the prime example) about the conflict in the Ukraine. I didn't see it as a Jewish problem then – I just knew it wasn’t true. I knew relatively little about Jewish influence at the time. But after three years of immersing myself in political analysis and media criticism, it is as plain as day that this is the case.

 

Russia Insider earned respect by doing our best to tell the truth, and calling out flagrant dishonesty in the media.

 

We're not about to stop now.

 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
Secrets found in the holy book of the Jews called the Talmud. Things you should be warned about, considering there is no acting in good faith with anyone adhering to these doctrines.

Some highlights translated.
 

1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim (non Jews) is like killing of a wild animal"

2. Aboda Zera 26b: " Even the Best of the Gentiles should be killed."

3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A Goy (gentile) who pries into the law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

4. Libbre David 37: "To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly."

5. Libbre David 37: "If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Whoever will violate this order shall be put to death.

6. Yabhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse is permitted with a little girl if she is 3 years of age."

7. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by using subterfuge wording."

8. Hilkkoth Akkum XI: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

9. Hilkkoth Akkum XI: "Show no mercy to Goyim."

10. Choschen Hamm 388,5: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelite to Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration, to wipe them off the face of the earth."

11. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds that belongs to the Akum (Gentile). He who returns lost property to the Gentile sins against the law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the law. It is praise worthy to return the lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely if by doing so, Christians will praise the Jews, and look upon them as honorable people."

12. Szaaloth-Utzsabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything about them."

13. Baba Necia 114,6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."

14. Simeon Hadarson, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes, every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

15. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non Jew in human form so that Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

16. Aboda Sara 37a: "A gentile girl who is 3 years of age can be violated."

17. Gad. Shas. 2.2: "A Jew may violate but may not marry a non Jew girl."

18. Tosefta. Aboda Zera, B 5: "If a Goy kills a Goy or a Jew he is responsible, but if a Jew kills a Goy, he is not responsible."

19. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denounciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill them before he denounces."

20. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belong to the Jewish nations, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without scruples."
 
 
 
- Fredi Hazeem, Talmud Excerpts Sept 2016