phrase “Great Replacement” - in the news following its use by New Zealand mosque shooter Brenton Tarrant -
means exactly that: the extermination of the white race in its historic homelands through mass Third World immigration,
a process which left to run its course, will see whites plummet to minority in most western European states, North America,
Australia and New Zealand within the next 30 or 40 years - and then be utterly smothered to extinction within a few
decades after that.
Although liberal media outlets are denying that this is reality - because they are part of the grand
plan to make this extermination process possible - all the facts show clearly that whites are being replaced in all their
homelands, and only the outright liars of the controlled media could dare to claim otherwise.
that year, the US Census Bureau said, “whites” will comprise 49.7 percent of the population in contrast to 24.6
percent for Hispanics, 13.1 percent for blacks, 7.9 percent for Asians, and 3.8 percent for multiracial population.
Because nonwhites as a group are younger than
whites, the minority white tipping point comes earlier for younger age groups. The census projections indicate that, for
youth under 18 - the post-millennial population–nonwhites will outnumber whites in 2020 - less than two years
For those age 18-29–members of the younger labor force and voting age populations–the
tipping point will occur in 2027.
By 2060, the census projects whites will comprise only
36 percent of the under age 18 population, with Hispanics accounting for 32 percent.
Western Europe, much the same scenario is unfolding. In Britain, for example, the number of nonwhite pupils in UK primary schools as of 2012 was 27.1 percent of the total in primary schools, and 23.4 percent in secondary schools. At that rate of
reproduction, nonwhites will be the majority of the population under the age of 21 in the UK by 2030—only 10 years
According to official statistics released by the UK government’s Department of Education, white British children have been effectively ethnically cleansed from most schools in greater London, Birmingham, Manchester,
and parts of South Yorkshire and East Lancashire, with no less than 1,755 institutions—or one out of nine schools
across the country—now having majority “non-English speaking pupils.”
Overall, given the mass nonwhite immigration into
Britain underway since the 1960s, has led to the result that white British people will become an absolute minority in their
homeland by 2066—at the very latest, and likely sooner.
As reported by Professor David Coleman, figures
from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) show that “at current immigration levels” (that was written in 2010),
the proportion of the white British-born population will fall from 80 percent to 59 percent by 2051.
“On those assumptions the ‘white British’ population
would decline to 45 million by 2051,” Professor Coleman wrote. “Were the assumptions to hold, the ‘white
British’ population of Britain would become the minority after about 2066.”
Importantly, he added that this was a “milestone
that would be passed much earlier in younger age groups.” Professor Coleman’s point about the age-spread is
of vital importance to understanding the full extent of the racial demographic replacement of white British people.
This means that within the next 35 years, the majority of that population will either have died, or be
close to death—and the younger generations, which are, as Professor Coleman has pointed out, overwhelmingly nonwhite,
will have replaced them.
In other words, the racial demographic collapse will happen suddenly,
as the older white population dies off—a factor which is being rapidly sped up by the increasing and ongoing nonwhite
“immigration,” as borne out by the fact that the white population was already only 79 percent of the total in
In June 2016, Professor Coleman repeated his prediction in Standpoint magazine. His article, titled “Uncontrolled Immigration Means Finis Britanniae,” said that “rapid population growth, driven by the highest immigration in our history, is destabilising and
transforming its population, its environment and its ethnic make-up into something quite new,” and that “migration
accounted overall for 85 percent of population growth from 2001–2012.”
Professor Coleman pointed
out that in the “1991 census, the nonwhite population, mostly of post-1960 immigrant origin, stood at 3 million or
6 percent of the total in England and Wales. By 2011 this had increased to nearly 8 million, or 14 percent of the total.
“Those describing themselves as ‘White British’ comprised 88 percent of the total population in
“But by the 2011 census, the ‘White British’ population in England and Wales had declined
by 400,000, whereas the nonwhite population had increased by over three million, and the population describing itself as
white but not British (many from Eastern Europe) had increased by just over a million.
“I made a projection
in 2010 that if immigration stayed at its long-term rate of around 180,000 a year as it was at the time, the White British-born
population would decline from 80 percent of the total then to just 59 percent in 2051,” Professor Coleman continued.
“Taking the projection to a more uncertain distance, the White British population would cease to be the majority
in the U.K. by the late 2060s.
“However, should current high levels of immigration persist
for any length of time, that date would move closer to the present. Britain would then become unrecognisable to its present
“Some people would welcome a brave new experiment, pioneering a wider world
future. Others, though, might say ‘Finis Britanniae’.”
In France, economist
and fund manager Charles Gave, writing for the think tank Institute des Libertes, pointed out that by 2057 - that is, 40 years at the very most - France and Western Europe (which he called “Old
Europe”) will have a majority nonwhite population with a Muslim majority.
“And so, within 40 years at the latest,
it is almost certain that the majority of the population will be Muslim in Austria, Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium and Holland,”
he wrote. “Again, these are not predictions but calculations, and I do not even call for new immigrants.”
The pace could be accelerated given continuing Muslim migration into France and other Western European states,
either through regular legal processes or through fake refugees pouring into Europe from the Middle East and North Africa.
“Our summer will be really over the day when demographics will change, simply because we will have become
a minority in our own countries and the majority will no longer pay attention to 68-year-old jeremiads, all of whose authors
will be retired or dead,” he wrote.
“The immense news of the next 30 or 40 years
will thus be the disappearance of the European populations, whose ancestors have created the modern world. And with these
populations will disappear the diverse and complementary European nations that have made an immense success of the old continent
for at least five centuries.”
In Australia, the same pattern is emerging. In 2016, a fertility map survey of Sydney, the most populous city in Australia, confirmed that immigration is allowing nonwhite Muslims from the Middle East to rapidly
The “fertility map,” drawn up by social research company McCrindle,
showed that many of the most fertile suburbs in Sydney are located in migrant clusters such as Lakemba, Auburn, Guildford,
Punchbowl, and Bankstown—all popular with “families of Middle Eastern background.”
The appearance of the report was timed with
official projections that Australia’s population will hit the 24 million mark next week, with the increase being almost
solely due to legal nonwhite immigration from the Middle East and Asia.
The appearance of the report came with official projections that Australia’s
population was going to hit 24 million mark, with the increase being almost solely due to legal nonwhite immigration from
the Middle East and Asia.
According to the Daily Telegraph article, titled “Migrant birthrates are changing Australia: Average
birthrate below replacement level,” the replacement of white people with Third Worlders in Australia is the “biggest
story of our times, but political correctness has stifled debate so badly that politicians are too afraid to even talk about
said politicians were underestimating how quickly societies can change. “Normally for a population transformation
you need a Black Death, the Plague or a world war,” he said. “But in this case we are having it without any of
that. That’s why it’s the most fascinating question of our times.”
The Daily Telegraph ended its online story with an editorial
comment, saying that “Demography is destiny, as the saying goes. If there is any truth to this, Sydney in the future
will be a substantially different place.”
The “Great Replacement” is therefore no myth. It is a reality, and no matter what the liberal-left
and controlled media might say, unless it is halted, it will lead to the extermination of the white race in the Americas,
Europe, and Australia/New Zealand.
"None are as hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are
free. The Truth has been kept from the depth of their Minds by Masters who
rule them with lies. They feed them
on falsehoods till wrong looks like
right in their eyes."
...Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Click on this text to watch THE JEW TACTICS OF IMMIGRATION
It was the American Jewish Committee (AJC)
which first vigorously advocated for open immigration in America beginning in 1914 until the great watershed in 1965.
Click on this text to watch The LEFT's beef with white people EXPLAINED...
Click on this text to watch EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (part 5)...
Click on this text to watch America is NOT a Nation of Immigrants or a Melting Pot | The Truth About Immigration into America
Click on this text to hear WHITE GENOCIDE quotes from the JEW'S mouth...
Click on this text to watch a video titled: Why They Want To Replace White People
Click on this text to watch: The International Financing of Engineered Migration...
Click on this text to watch Douglas Murray Interview on the Death of Europe...
Click on this text to watch Pat Condell describe how Europe Is Killing Itself...
Zionist Jews have always lobbied and legislated for open
immigration for America and this 1948 quote by former
American Jewish Congress Director, David Petegorsky,
sums it up nicely:
[he really means supremacy, not
survival] can only take place within the framework
of a progressive and
expanding democratic society,
which through its institutions and public policies,
gives expression to the concept
of cultural pluralism."
Jews had been lobbying
for open immigration since
1914, but the Immigration and Nationality Act
Amendments of 1965 (House Bill
H.R. 2580) opened the
floodgates by removing the favored nation status for
Western European nations regarding
1965, even the dreaded Russians and Chinese are
welcome in America and Jewish-Russian
has been accomplished with a vengeance.
With an influx
of Hispanics, Black African, Eastern
Europeans and Asians, the Jews were better able to
and go largely unnoticed in what was
previously a predominately White-Christian America.
America became a racial “melting pot” (a term coined by
Jewish writer Israel Zangwill
from his play, The Melting
Pot). Only not much “melting”
has occurred; only self-
imposed segregation has largely occurred.
It’s much easier to divide and influence public opinion
and eviscerate Anglo-Saxon Christian American
traditions if there are a convoluted mix of races and
cultures introduced to the land. Not to
mention the influx
of cheap labor that would be beneficial to all business
concerns, especially Jewish owned
The Zionist Jewish Americans who brought us the
immigration law of 1965 were New York Senator Jacob
Javits (D-NY), New York Congressman Emanuel Celler
(D-NY), former president of the American Jewish
Congress Leo Pfeffer, and Council of Foreign Relations
member Norman Podhoretz.
Earlier immigration reformists were Jews such
Herbert H. Lehman, who installed Harry Rosenfield as
the Executive Director of the President’s
Immigration and Naturalization, and Philip Perlman as
the Chairman in 1952.
Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish
Congress, The Jewish Federation,
the American Civil
Liberties Union, and the B’nai B’rith filed briefs in
support of open immigration
before the Senate
Subcommittee in the early 1960s leading up to the
passage of the Immigration and Nationality
Amendment of 1965.
The Immigration act of 1965 radically changed
make-up of immigration into America. Before the Act
was passed, the majority of immigrants coming
America were Western European whites from favored
nations. After the
passage of the Act, 80% of immigrants
were from non-white, non-Christian countries world-wide.
The Zionist creed calls for the non-assimilation of Jews
into the dominate
culture of the countries they choose to
live in. So by blurring the dominate culture by
introducing a myriad of
different cultures into the mix,
Zionists don’t have to assimilate into anything. Notice by
TV that there are presently and seemingly as
many African, Hispanic and Asian faces represented on
sitcoms and advertisements
as there are Anglo faces, as if
the racial numbers in America are all equal. They are not equal.
White Europeans make up 72.4%
Native Americans and Pacific Islanders 3.8%
Of course, there is interracial
that makes the percentage figures suspect.
Jews with a primary
loyalty to Israel debased White-
Christian American culture with their removal of
while Israel enjoys the most
restrictive immigration policy in the world.
Again, if you aren’t a member of the
Jewish tribe, or an adherent of Judaism,
cannot apply for Israeli citizenship... Talk
about two-faced hypocracy.
And what about the quality of immigrants? During and
especially after the Vietnam debacle, hundreds
thousands of Vietnamese were fast-tracked to American
citizenship who had sold out their own country
of birth to
side with the invasive Jewish controlled Americans
really only being exploited in the global
domination scheme, not democratizing
winning side of a civil war.
Have the Vietnamese integrated into American culture?
Not really, at least no more than any other ethnic group
that has immigrated to America either legally or
in the last half century. Many Vietnamese can be found
segregated in an area of Orange County,
Little Saigon (it’s near Disneyland and has its own
freeway exit signage).
Recently arrived Russian Jews can be found segregated
in specific areas of New York
City and Mexicans can be
found segregated in areas such as South-Central L.A.,
South Phoenix, and South
America is incorrectly touted as the “melting pot”
but the Chinese, who arrived here in the mid-19 th century,
still segregate themselves in so called
“China Towns” in
places such as L.A., San Francisco and Seattle.
Cubans segregate themselves in “Little Havana”
African Americans have their own turf the same as Hispanics.
Of course self-segregation isn’t a precise
and there are certainly spill–overs and blurred
racial divides in every American city but the segregated
are there and everyone knows where they
are and even warn visitors about which neighborhoods to avoid.
Speaking of melting pots... The Amerasian
act of Act of December 1987 provided for the
transportation from Vietnam to America, and the
subsequent assimilation, of 25,000 Vietnamese children
and young adults who had been fathered by American
The G.I.s had
abandoned their offspring upon the
conclusion of their tour of duty In Viet Nam. These
became known as the “Bui Doi Kids.”
Bui Doi is a Vietnamese term meaning “dust of life”
reference to the cast-off vagrant mixed-race street kids.
Two Jews, Claude-Michel
Schonberg and Alain
Boublil, are credited with making the term familiar after
their musical, "Miss
Saigon," became popular on Broadway
is the one we all recall as being the
Civil Rights pioneer of the 1960s but the pressure
brought to bear
on Johnson was brought by Zionist Jews
such as Arnold Aronson who was the founder and leader
of the Leadership
Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR).
The LCCR was a powerful coalition
of political and
religious groups that organized a nationwide lobbying
effort to aid passage of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. And
it was again Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler (D-
NY) who wrote and sponsored
Civil Rights legislation
signed into law in 1957 and1964.
You Gentiles by Maurice Samuel
Written in 1924, this shocking classic work of Jewish Supremacism maps
out what the avowedly Zionist author saw as
the cause of anti-Semitism through
the ages: an irreconcilable difference between Jews and all Gentiles, but Europeans
in particular. This difference, Samuel argued, was inherent and biological in origin. The author argues that the real point
of difference between Jew and Gentile is that the Gentiles follow what he calls the base “triviality”
of Gentiles versus the
God-like “seriousness” of Jews. This huge
psychological difference, Samuel says, is the reason why Jews regard “playful”
Gentiles as backward and silly, and why Gentiles will never be able to penetrate the Jewish perception of the
book goes on to discuss the main points of difference in behavior
between Jews and Gentiles focusing on physical activity,
religion, concepts of
good and evil, loyalty, science, fair play, and discipline. Maurice spells out why Jews have different
attitudes to all these moral and philosophical issues-and why these values are the opposite of those endorsed by
Samuel then says that these inherent and unchangeable differences will
always make the Jews out to be “destroyers” and
of European culture and society.
from the mouth of a Jewess________________________
Is About Getting Rid Of White People (And That’s A Good Thing)
One of the more common memes that I’ve seen white supremacists
spread around recently has been “diversity is a code word for white genocide”. The concept here is that diversity
is only promoted in white nations, and that the end goal is to eliminate white people altogether by flooding all white countries
with non-white people until there are no white people left. Well, guess what, white supremacists? That’s exactly right.
Diversity IS about getting rid of white people, and that’s a good thing.
First off, I am a white person myself, so allow me to get that out of the
way. I’m extremely glad that the white race is dying, and you should be too. White people do not have a right to exist.
Period. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s entirely true. Any white person with even the faintest knowledge
of history should curse themselves every single day for being white. Throughout all of recorded history, whites have engaged
in oppression, genocide, colonialism, imperialism, and just plain evil on a massive scale. White people have denied
every other race the right to exist, and have – at some point in history – oppressed every single race on the
then, should whites now be allowed to live in peace when whites have historically been the world’s #1 source of conflict
and oppression? Whiteness is racism. Period. Whiteness is the source of all oppression in the world. Whiteness is racism,
sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism. Eliminate whiteness
and you eliminate every single form of oppression that the world currently faces. No white people means no oppression. White
people are like a cancer and oppression is a symptom of the cancer. Cut out the cancer altogether – with the cancer
being white people – and you get rid of all of the oppression which white people cause.
I have dedicated my life to fighting racism,
and I have determined – based on all available evidence – that the only way to really eliminate racism is to
eliminate whiteness. Whiteness is the ocean from which racism flows. Get rid of whiteness and you get rid of racism. Despite
what white supremacists often claim, white people do not have a “culture”. White “culture” consists
of nothing more than oppression, genocide, and the disenfranchisement of minorities. White “culture” is racism
and nothing more. When white supremacists talk about “white culture”, what they’re really talking about
is racism. Over the course of history, white people have built a massive empire based entirely on the hard work of oppressed
and disenfranchised minority groups. But guess what, white people? That empire is finally coming to an end now, and its
demise is music to my hears. To quote the great anti-racist activist Tim Wise: “Do you hear it? The sound of your
empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”
Descendants of Holocaust
survivors can personally attest to the evil that white people are capable of when they hold the reins of power. Thankfully,
whites won’t be holding the reins of power for much longer. When white people die out, so will racism, sexism, queerphobia,
and all other forms of oppression. The only way to eliminate racism, white privilege, and white supremacy is to eliminate
whiteness altogether. When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory, and the role of whites in worldwide
oppression, my white students often ask me how they can “atone” for the evils of whiteness and how they can make
up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having any children and ensuring that the
white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.
Thankfully, white birthrates are indeed very low, while the birthrates
of minorities are much, MUCH higher. Within our lifetimes, whites will be a minority in a significant number of formerly
white countries, including the US, the UK, France, Germany, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, to name just a few. To white
supremacists yearning for the days when whites could rape and pillage the world with impunity, this is incredibly frightening.
To people on the right side of history, however, this looks like progress. Whites are finally getting their just desserts
– and it’s about time. I sincerely hope that, when the white power structure finally comes crashing down, whites
will receive no mercy from the minority groups that whites have spent centuries oppressing. We certainly don’t deserve
any mercy or kindness, as we have given nothing of the sort to others.
Whites should also know that, when they do become a minority in formerly
white countries, they will NOT be receiving affirmative action or any of the other benefits meant to assist the minorities
that whites have historically oppressed. Why? Because whites don’t deserve those benefits. It’s as simple as
that. One can look to South Africa, where whites are only about 8.4% of the population, but blacks continue to receive affirmative
action because blacks in South Africa have historically been disenfranchised by whites. The same thing will happen when
whites become a minority in North America, Europe, and Oceania, because whites have historically oppressed minorities in
all three of those continents. Not to mention, why should whites receive any kind of benefits when the ultimate goal is
to get rid of whites altogether? Finally, laws against hate speech will serve to prevent whites from complaining about this,
as any white person who complains will be arrested, given a long prison sentence, and made an example of for the rest of
the remaining white population. Speech that attempts to justify the white power structure and perpetuate white oppression
of minorities is not freedom of speech, and it has absolutely no place in modern society.
As white people, we all need to recognize
that we no longer have a place in the world. This world now belongs to the minorities that us whites have spent centuries
oppressing, and there is absolutely nothing that any pathetic white supremacists can do about it. In order for a better
world to be created, white people need to be exterminated. Period. It’s as simple as that. We should simply be thankful
that our death will be accomplished through mass immigration and declining birthrates. When whites have exterminated other
races, it wasn’t nearly so peaceful – it was done through violent genocide. But other races are not as evil
as whites are, and it’s important to remember that. The world belongs to minorities now, and they will make a much
better, more peaceful world with what they’re given. Only when white people have ceased to exist will a peaceful and
progressive society – free of racism and hatred – be possible. The only way to eliminate white privilege, white
oppression, white racism, and the oppressive white power structure is to eliminate white people altogether.
So, yes, white supremacists: diversity
is indeed white genocide. And white genocide is exactly what the world needs more than anything else.
Israel sits nice and comfy behind its wall, Jewish enablers have been pushing white genocide via replacement with hordes
of darks flooding the Euro nations of earth. Now, while this program has been in place since the end of WWII, Jews
are currently ramping up their attacks against we whites in advertising. Just as with population replacement, the end
game of Jewish advertising is also nothing less than our extermination.
Since returning to the US, I have done something that I almost never did
before, viz., watching a little TV. Generally after 7PM or so I will plop down and watch a true crime program or two.
“Cold Justice,” “Cold Case Files” and “Criminal Confessions” are three of my favorites. Unfortunately, these programs, and all others I’ve seen,
are infested with commercials. I am not talking about the local mom & pop commercials pitching a downtown cafe
or hardware store. No, I am talking about the flashy high dollar ads of sound, color, light, and neurotic humanoids
blasting about second-by-second like crazed cockroaches. Actually, and unlike local TV ads, these glitz and bling Jewish
productions really are there not so much to sell a product so much as they are there to sell an idea and push a political
agenda. Although fast food, beer, glamour, shiny cars, and insurance are the surface items being hawked on these big
budget ads, one quickly is aware that white genocide is the main object. Rarely does one of these ads pop up that is
not flagrantly anti-white.
In these commercials concocted by large Jewish ad agencies–known
collectively as “Madison Avenue”–straight white males are always the targets. As anyone who has
watched even a little TV knows by now, virtually all such men are portrayed as fat, fumbling, flopping fools; as just
a bunch of bumbling bozos and buffoons who are incompetent, clumsy clowns incapable of solving even the simplest task. They
are always either bouncing around stupidly and pointlessly from commercial to commercial, or they are standing stunned,
baffled, open-mouthed as if in a daze, or they are stuffing vast amounts of junk food into their gorge holes. These
same clueless white clods–the same, by the way, whose ancestors gave us electricity, automobiles, airplanes, computers,
heart transplants, and moon landings–are clearly lacking in every department, intellectually, morally, socially, interactionally,
and hygienically. White men are seldom leaders in these commercials; they are usually confused, perplexed, but willing, followers
of their betters, viz, brilliant black and brown men, and young, hard-charging super women. Invariably, this
motley menagerie, these saviors of the day, are always neat, always clean, always intelligent, always black, brown or female;
these superior beings merely roll their eyes in disgust at the ridiculous predicaments white men get into, then go about
showing by word or example how the unkempt, disgusting white male moron needs to do something the right way (photo above)
Mostly, the only white men who are portrayed as bright, intelligent, slim,
clean, and successful in these ads are either gay couples or those with dark women on their arms.
In every Jewish commercial ever created, a black or brown is never, no
matter what the situation, portrayed in a bad light, ever–in the fantasy world of Jewish commercials,
they are always the flawless decision-makers, the sure, certain, selfless take-chargers, the best and the brightest mankind
has to offer. They never commit the same stupid mistakes as the crude, clumsy, clueless white men.
They are all cool, confident, well-dressed, natural-born-leader types; they are scientists, surgeons, professors, jet pilots,
or just your common everyday successful black or brown businessman cooly making their million dollar decisions each day
inside Fortune 500 boardrooms. White males in these commercials are often looked at askance and lectured by blacks
and browns on the proper, mature and intelligent way of doing things even though the ancestors of the latter, with millions
of years to work with, somehow never managed to even invent the simple wheel.
Race-mixing, of course, is the main focus of these Jewish commercials. Virtually every other
couple shown is a mixed race twosome, usually a charming, successful, intelligent young black man embracing, kissing and
rolling happily in bed with a lovely, slim, graceful white woman. These couples are always portrayed as laughing,
care-free, successful, and deeply in love; they are never seen as they in reality usually are–miserable, angry, arguing,
drunken, drugged, fat, vulgar, disheveled, and violent.
In one Progressive Insurance ad, a beautiful young white woman bumps into a black man at a juke
box whereupon they fall instantly in love. In the next shot the deeply smitten duo are happily performing together
on stage, singing to a rapturous audience. “Now That’s Progressive” reads the Jewish moral
Now, fact is, despite Jews trying to
convince us on their commercials that every other couple is a mixed race match, no matter where one looks in the US are
mixed-race couples the norm. Left to our own devices, miscegenation would remain forever but a tiny fraction of
the white population. If left alone, our instincts would naturally kick in and few of us would even socialize with
blacks and browns, much less date and have sex with them. If left alone, our instincts will naturally repel us from
dark-skinned people, their strange, and to our instincts, their ugly looks, their childish, irresponsible actions, their
impulsive, violent, primitive nature. And Jews know this. Their ambition, their hope, their dream, is to take
fiction and create a new reality by portraying race-mixing as the wonderful, inevitable norm to come. Once such a
consensus among the young and dumb is reached, they feel, the rest will be easy. The non-stop commercial message to
immature minds is: “If you want to be happy, healthy, successful, then stay away from your fellow whites, the losers,
and choose for a mate a natural winner, a dark person.” Of course, a heavily or entirely mixed race America
would nicely accomplish two of the Jew’s greatest historical ambitions, i.e., 1) the genocide of the white race, and
2) absolute Jewish control of the ugly, ignorant mulatto/mestizo mess that remains.
Clearly, blacks, browns and whites do not create these commercials–Jews do. All the
above is how Jews want unthinking TV watchers to perceive white men. Blacks and browns in these Jewish commercials
are used by Jews as they have always been used–as hammers against we whites. Jews do not care a fig about the
well-being or elevation of blacks and browns; their sole purpose is for them to be used as Jews have always used them–as
clubs and bricks to attack we whites.
is how the Jews who create the ads want us and others to think about ourselves. Their hope is that ultimately we will
think so badly about ourselves that we will no longer care about ourselves, about our past, about our present or especially
about our future, about marriage and children, about fighting Jewish hate around the world; that we will simply give up
and commit suicide. And, of course, these devious individuals hope their fanciful dreams become reality for young and
dumb white women and that they will naturally fall into the arms of REAL men–the black and brown mud men.
Truly, the depth of Jewish hatred is breath-taking. But so is their
almost comical, suicidal ignorance. Sooner than they could ever imagine the consequences of their efforts to destroy
whites via immigration replacement, inter-racial sex commercials, pornography, abortion, actual white on white World Wars,
or a hundred other means, will bear them a terrible fruit. As we know from history, when white people finally get
pissed off, really pissed off, hell is to pay. And, as we all know, the white world is very, very close
to critical mass right now.
word, a warning, a historical truth: An armed and angry white man is the most deadly killing machine the earth has
ever known–he is intelligent, resourceful, adaptable, strong as steel, hard as iron, he never sleeps, he never forgets…and
he is virtually impossible to kill.
for the rushed and rather disorganized article above. I usually do a better job than this. The post is merely
a piece written by someone who wanted to say a certain something but lacked the proper time to say it.)
The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail: Book Review
October 11, 2017
The Camp of the Saints
Social Contract Press, 1994
The Camp of the Saints was published nearly 45 years ago and remains one of
the most prophetic works
on the destruction of Western Europe due to third-world immigration.
I first heard about this novel when it was mentioned multiple times by Steve Bannon. When describing the migrant crisis he said, “It’s not a migration. It’s really an invasion.
I call it the Camp of the Saints.” Previously, Bannon said, “It’s been almost a Camp of the Saints-type
invasion into Central and then Western and Northern Europe.” The book’s been mentioned several times on Tucker Carlson Tonight, and Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) has recommended it. (RELATED: Bannon’s Canon: A Steve Bannon Reading List)
between the novel’s story and today are uncanny. Instead of a Muslim invasion, it starts with the poor from India.
Instead of staggered migrant boats and rafts coming to Europe’s shores, it’s a fleet of 100 ships arriving at
once. Today Eastern Europe has closed its borders to refugees; in the novel it’s Australia. Rather than a commie Pope
Francis from Argentina, they have a commie pope from Brazil.
The Camp of the Saints predicts our current times, when no one can be proud of their European heritage or try to save Western civilization without
being called a racist or fined for hate speech.
The novel highlights the role of the elite liberal media and how they use white guilt to make Europeans go
against their conscience. Anyone who speaks against the migrants is called racist, and even the government leaders
won’t protect their nation’s borders:
Let’s just talk about the media, so called, and the shameless way certain people, under the guise of freedom,
took a tool meant for mass communication, twisted and warped it, and used it to bully the minds of the public.
The Consul General of Belgium tries to fight for Europe. “Your
damned, obnoxious, detestable pity!” he yells at his fellow leaders. “Call it what you please: world brotherhood,
charity, conscience . . . Can’t you see where it’s leading? . . . You’ve got to be out of your minds just
to sit back and let it all happen, little by little. All because of your pity. Your insipid, insufferable pity!”
The message of the book is clear: Christian
morality will be the downfall of the West, so long as it continues to be interpreted as a religion of meekness, whose adherents
must roll over and give their countries away to people who want to rob, rape, and kill them. This is in contrast to most
of its history, when Christians wanted to defend the kingdom of Christendom to preserve their values and religion for future
In The Camp of the Saints, a fleet of 100 boats carrying 800,000 migrants leaves India’s shores with no clear destination. They’re rumored to
be headed toward France (the author, Jean Raspail, is French) but the country has some time to decide what to do. As
requests pour in to take the migrants, the pleas “[seem] more like threats.”
Journalists take the side of the migrants, claiming they’ll “enrich,
cleanse and redeem the Capitalist West.” Photos that would sway public opinion negatively toward the refugees are
kept out of the press. Every horrid thing the refugee fleet does is twisted into something noble in the mainstream media,
and just like today, it’s always the fault of the Europeans.
Editorial cartoons depict the white president of South Africa torturing a poor Hindu,
an attempt to guilt the country to take the migrants. Protests erupt at South African embassies throughout Europe.
South Africa threatens to fire on the boats if they come to their shores, and the country is spared. (The novel was
published 20 years before the end of apartheid, and assumes whites still maintain power there.)
In the schools, liberal teachers make students
pen essays about sad and suffering refugees who need help. Parents keep their mouths shut, not wanting to burden their little
children with the truth about the crisis. Meanwhile, no matter what subject is taught—math, literature, science—the
teachers fill students’ heads with ideas about the racist West.
When Australia refuses the migrant fleet, young people in European cities
take to the Australian embassies to protest their migrant ban, chanting “Racists, Fascists!” The only difference
with today’s protests is that in the novel, the protestors are actually peaceful.
When someone does take a stand against the insanity, it’s done in
a mealy-mouthed way that will inspire no one to action: “perhaps it wouldn’t be terribly wise, just now.”
As the migrants’ arrival on France’s
southern shores becomes imminent, residents flee to the north. An old literature professor, Calgues, remains on the
shores of the Mediterranean in his ancestral home from 1673. A hippie shows up and delights in telling Calgues
how he’ll bring the migrants to use his antique furniture for firewood, to “crap all over your terrace, and
wipe their hands on your shelves full of books.” Why will they do this? Because the world of Calgues, the world
of Western civilization, with thousands of years of literature, mathematics, philosophy, music, art, and culture, means nothing
to them. The Left-wing hippie hates being white and despises “squares” like his middle-class parents and sisters,
who fled north for fear of being raped. Though the phrase “white privilege” isn’t used, he’s anxious
for his white family to be impoverished, just like the brown people of the earth.
After the migrants arrive, they spread throughout France. Existing immigrants
join up with them, along with Left-wing anarchists.
Residents in one small town have to stop using their community swimming pool; the migrants are spreading gonorrhea
to the town’s children in the water. Medical records of all the citizens are checked, so as to not be racist to the
Arabs, and in the end it’s confirmed that the newcomers are spreading it. The townspeople want to require medical
certificates before entering the pool to protect the children. How does the news react? With headlines proclaiming “Anti-Arab
Racism Alive and Well!” Caving to social pressure, the town abandons the required medical screenings. The European
natives abandon the pool they scrimped and saved to pay for, and Arabs get the run of it.
Meanwhile, the wife of a prominent pro-refugee journalist is gang-raped,
then commits suicide. White women are kidnapped and raped in brothels. The situations predicted by Raspail more than 40 years
ago are being played out in Europe today, as seen in the Rotherham child rape gang cover-up and countless other crimes. Just like today, laws are passed against what’s now called “hate speech.”
And also like today, everything is the fault of whites:
Now, it’s a known fact that racism comes in two forms: that
practiced by whites—heinous and inexcusable, whatever its motives—and that practiced by blacks—quite justified,
whatever its excesses, since it’s merely the expression of a righteous revenge, and it’s up to the whites to
be patient and understanding.
in New York City, the migrants have arrived. The city is taken over by the sounds of an “infernal symphony”
of glass shattering, gunshots, and screaming. Woe to the car that stops at a light; soon it will “find itself
buried in a sea of black silhouettes, brandishing picks; and then the shouts of no! no! no!, those desperate shouts shrieked
into the darkness and suddenly stilled, snuffed out by a knife, a razor, a chain, by a club full of spikes, by a pounding
fist, or fingers, or phallus …” There’s a new wave of white flight out to American suburbs as people
try to flee the crime and poorly performing schools.
easy to see why The Camp of the Saints is recommended by so many on the Right. Besides its colorful prose, Raspail’s prescience is astounding when it comes
to the effects of third-world immigration on the West.
Since The Camp of the Saints is from the 1970s, it’s refreshing to read something completely non-PC. And despite the depressing subject matter,
made doubly so due to us living a Camp of the Saints scenario today, his memorable characters create some laugh-out-loud
Click on this text to read THE CAMP OF THE SAINTS
"If all of the dead allied
soldiers could see their countries now, they would have
thrown down their weapons and fought with the Germans." - David Irving
Jews Behind Race Mixing
By: Dr. Edward R. Fields
Jew Civil Rights Bill Author — Jacob Javits
Race-Mixing in America
The Answers Are Complex
Here Are the Facts
From Their Own Mouths — The Jews
Reveal Their Plans
Jews Raise Money for Blacks
Lawyers for Militants Are Jews
Jews Urge White Christians
to Marry Blacks but Urge Own Kind to Marry Jews Only
Different Story for Jews
Don’t Date Non-Jews
Why the Jews Seek the Mongrelization of the White Christian People
Self-Hate Instilled Within Whites
Guilty of Negroes’ Crimes
New Jersey’s Little Riot Commission
Communist Party Fought for Race Mixing
Millionaire Jews Back the Black Revolution
NAACP — A Jewish Organization
Jew Civil Rights Bill Author — Emanuel Celler
Sen. Jacob Javits
(above) at a dinner given by the Joint Defense Appeal, a Jewish Fund raising organization, at the Hotel Plaza,
in N.Y. on Oct. 24, 1957, called on President Eisenhower to name immediately the members of the CIVIL
RIGHTS COMMISSION called for under the new Civil Rights Law.
At the time Javits was running for the U.S. Senate, there was much ado about
his Red-front associations.
Cong. Emanuel Celler and Sen. Jacob Javits, both Zionists, were the authors of
the infamous; Civil Rights Bill.
JEWS BEHIND RACE-MIXING IN AMERICA
The purpose of this
article is to prove, through documented evidence that Jews in America are the prime movers and guiding force behind the
massive attempt to mongrelize the White Christian people with the Black Race.
Of course everyone realizes that there are many gullible and brainwashed
Gentiles working toward this same end.
But the movement to mix the races in America is most definitely sparked and financed by organized
Jewry in every city of any size in America containing a formal Jewish community.
The first question which arises is why are the Jews so
fanatical in their zeal to integrate the races and why do they intensely resist mixing of their own blood
with either us White Christians, or the Blacks?
THE ANSWERS ARE COMPLEX
In order to understand Jewish thinking on this matter, one must first recognize
that the Jews are a very unique people.
The Jews are bound to one another by three different means— which no other people in the
world have in common.
- The Jews have one religion—Judaism!
Jews are of one nation—Israel!
- The Jews are of one Race!
Race is defined as a group of
people who have inbred with their own kind for centuries and exhibit like features and characteristics. Thus the Jews of
today are a tight-knit race, and highly conscious of the great gulf which separates them from White Christians.
Gentiles do not have
even the basic rudiments of unity existing in Jewry. We are of many different churches, different nationalities and from
divided language groups of Europe. Feuds, wars, jealousy and hatreds have always divided our White Folk.
This division has made it easy, for a skillful
and highly organized Jewish minority to dominate us.
If anyone is in doubt about Jewish control over our daily lives, let them check on
who owns all the stores on Main Street. Find out who controls the three T. V. Networks. (Sarnoff heads NBC,
Paley (Palensky) heads CBS and David Goldenson heads ABC.)
Check who controls
Hollywood, or which racial group controls many of the giant combines buying controlling interest in thousands of formerly
Christian owned companies in America!
HERE ARE THE FACTS
Within each Jewish
Community in every city of any size in America the Jews operate numerous organizations. They are designed to guide and control
the lives of every Jew. They are also constructed to give the Jews a tremendously powerful single voice
in American politics. Almost every Christian politician lives in dread of offending his local Jewish community. He knows
that if he does not tread softly, listen to their every demand, endorse aid to Israel and sale of Israeli Bonds, support
United Jewish Appeal—the Jews will vote for the man against him, spend a fortune to elect his next opponent,
and direct the local daily press in a hate campaign against him.
All the small Jewish clubs and social groups are united under the American
Jewish Committee. All Jew businessmen belong to a secret society called “B’nai B’rith”
and they have their own secret spy agency called the “Anti-Defamation League.” These
are the groups that harass Right-Wing Patriots and seek to control elected politicians and the daily press. But, their most
important mission of all, is to integrate the White Christian people to produce an indolent, Mulatto race for the future.
FROM THEIR OWN MOUTHS — THE JEWS REVEAL THEIR PLANS
The following are especially selected quotes
from the most important Jewish leaders in America concerning the integration of the races.
Aaron Goldman addressing
the National Council of Jewish Women said:
“We Jews have played a significant part in securing laws for
Negroes that guarantee equality. We have raised the expectations of American Negroes and must not allow them to become frustrated,
angry, and desperate if their dreams fail to materialize. The Negro must enter the mainstream of American life.”
Willen, president of the National Council of Jewish Women reported on April 9, 1968 that:
must intensify their fight in behalf of the American Negro’s struggle for racial justice and economic opportunity.
Our children ask
us to look forward, not backward. We cannot bind our young people to us by reciting past persecutions.
We must set an example far Jewish youth
by intensifying efforts in behalf of increased employment for Negroes and to aid anti-poverty programs. This is the best
way to combat White backlash.”
Sen. Jacob Javits addressing the National Commission of the Jewish
Anti-Defamation League in 1967 said:
“The Negroes’ struggle
for equal rights is of vital importance to American Jews, and is the most important struggle in the United States.
Jewish support of the Negroes’ aspirations for equality should
be regarded as a badge of honor.”
Sen. Javits called for massive aid to Negroes and asked for the taxpayers to provide $35 billion
over the next 10 years to raise the Black man up to the level of Whites. He also called for the adoption of a guaranteed
annual wage at double the amount called for by President Nixon.
Philip M. Klutznick, Vice-President of the Anti-Defamation
League at the same convention said:
“Jewish communities have set the pattern in the area of ‘social action’
in America. The outpouring of Federal funds for poverty programs during the next 25 years will give the Jewish community
an opportunity to redistribute their resources and redirect their energies in the most meaningful religious, cultural and
special educational activities for Jews that history has ever known. Major Jewish organizations must unite to set up long
range survey communities to establish the goals and priorities of American Jewish communities over the next three decades.”
NOTE: Readers should re-read this last paragraph. Jews run the poverty aid and urban renewal programs in many cities.
It is not an admission that this tax money is being used by Jews to build political power for Jews).
Saul M. Linowitz, former
ambassador to the Organization of American States, told the Zionist woman’s order, Hadassah
at its 53rd meeting at Miami Beach:
“The bedrock for civil rights is nothing less than economic rights, school integration
and the right to vote.”
SAUL ALINSKY Trains Black revolutionists.
Rabbi Arthur J. Lelyveld,
addressing last year’s American Jewish Congress meeting in Miami Beach said:
“All of us must be prepared
to make any sacrifice necessary to achieve an effective program aimed at achieving economic justice for the negro. We
must make the economic sacrifice of paying higher taxes to win the more important war on poverty at home.”
Abe Fortas, (removed from the Supreme Court for taking bribes from the corrupt Jew financier, Louis
Wolfson) told a dinner of the American Jewish Committee in July of 1968 in New York City:
of the non-Whites for equality in America are essentially the same as those of the Jew, and the Jews must help in his struggle.”
addressing the National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods in Miami Beach on Oct. 28, 1969, said:
should know something about the outer limits of frustration and rage of the Black Communities. We who have suffered better
understand the anguish of the Black man today.”
MAX FISHER Millionaire Jew Republican finances Black Militants.
Theodore Bikel, Jewish folk singer and star in the play, “Fiddler
On The Roof” in a speech of July, 1969, in a Jewish temple in Honolulu said:
“A strong commitment to civil
rights is implicit in Judaism.
We must speak out
Rabbi Maurice N. Eisendrath, president of the Union
of American Hebrew Congregations, on Oct. 26, speaking in Miami Beach called for a five year moratorium on the
space program and an immediate ceasefire in Vietnam. The rabbi said this would free billions of tax dollars which could be
immediately funneled into the Black ghetto:
“Call it reparations or simple justice, but some form of restitution is owed to the
America must rush massive aid to the Negro
the way aid has been rushed to the Jews of Israel.”
MONEY FOR BLACKS
publications are filled with countless articles about Jews raising money for militant negro causes. The Emma Lazarus
Federation in New York City raised thousands of dollars for Martin Luther King’s now infamous Selma, Alabama
march. Each year Mrs. Edward M. Warburg, wife of the multi-millionaire international Jewish banker, raises
millions for the United Negro College Fund.
The most sensational and publicized fund raising dinner was held by wealthy
Leonard Bernstein in his plush Park Avenue apartment for the 21 Black Panthers on trial
for bombings in New York City. It was a sight to behold, in Bernstein’s elegant duplex apartment, the Jewesses in evening
gowns, welcoming Black Panthers wearing wild beards, bushy Afro-hair styles and blue jeans.
The wife of the famous director of the New
York Philharmonic, Mrs. Bernstein said later to the press:
“This was not a frivolous party,
but a chance for all of us to hear what’s happening to them. They’ve really been treated very inhumanely. The
trial of the 21 New York Black Panthers has had me very upset.”
Here we have the rich affluent left-wing, whose children all go to exclusive
private schools, consorting with the Black militant radicals who are out to destroy this nation. Mr. and Mrs. Leonard Bernstein
personally made out a check for $12,000 to help the Black Panthers at the dinner.
Two other fund raising parties have been held in New York by millionaire
Jews to raise money for the murderous Black Panthers. John Simon, a Jew editor at T.V. panelist Bennet
Cerf’s Random House Publishers, gave a similar party, as did Jew film director Sidney Lumet.
LAWYERS FOR MILITANTS ARE JEWS
In almost every case of radical militants who are caught burning, killing
and bombing, we find Jewish lawyers ready to defend them. Eldridge Cleaver, who fled the U. S. to escape
prison was represented by the Jew Charles Garry.
The New York 21 are defended by the Jews Gerald
B. Lefcourt and Sanford Katz. Of course everyone knows that the “Chicago Seven”
(4 were Jews) revolutionaries were defended by the Jew legal team of Leonard Weinglass and William
JACK GREENBERG, lawyer who heads NAACP legal fund explains how
busing should take place in Houston, Texas.
Jew lawyers are also pushing for integration of White suburbs. A Harvard trained lawyer named
Roger N. Beilenson heads “Westchester Residential Opportunities, Inc.”
They purchase homes
in fine White neighborhoods for $16,000 up to $50,000 and then re-sell them to Blacks. Beilenson was a former housing director
for the Urban League.
Both the Rockefeller Foundation and (Jew) Aaron Norman Foundation
have given tax free grants to further his work.
“The New York Times” of Sept. 19, 1966, really
let the cat out of the bag when it admitted:
“The Jewish community has long been the financial backbone of the
civil rights movement. … No special commission on race is needed to arouse Jewish support for civil rights activity
in the South. … Jewish support for civil rights is still high.”
And, of course, we all know that Jack Greenberg is the head of the NAACP
Legal Fund and is responsible for filing all of the suits which have resulted in so much suffering by innocent
White children forced into mixed schools by this Jewish conspiracy.
WHITE CHRISTIANS TO MARRY BLACKS BUT URGE OWN KIND TO MARRY JEWS ONLY
Rabbi Abraham Feinberg of Canada has won the nickname,
“The Red Rabbi” for his visits to North Vietnam and efforts on behalf of communist causes. In the Maclean’s
Review magazine of Sept. 5, 1967 he states:
“Until we learn to fight our ingrown fears of sexual relations
between the races, the end of the race problem will not be in sight. Only when we no longer raise our eyebrows at the sight
of a Negro holding hands with a White girl will the West have begun to tear the racial poison from its vitals.
Such a change will
involve an inside-out remodelling of the White psyche, for our fear of mixed marriages is deeply rooted. But the change
must begin sometime. Why not now!
If anything, the law should encourage, not forbid, the intermingling of ‘bloods’.
Marches and civil-rights demonstrations can dramatize the immediate imperative of justice. Religious teaching can now enunciate
the challenge of brotherhood.
Fair-employment laws and other civil rights legislation can protect minorities from overt
Plan for the Future
“The great ideal of Judaism. … is that the whole world
shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations—a greater Judaism, in fact—all
the separate races and religions shall disappear.”
from the Jewish World, 9th Feb. 1883
“ONE WORLD, ONE RACE … the deliberate
encouragement of interracial marriages is the only way to hasten this process. And it may be that time is growing short.
The dominance of our world has begun to shift, like cargo in a listing vessel, from the White races to the colored.”
Feinberg urges our White Christian people to surrender the blood of our forefathers and commit racial suicide by
helping mongrelize the White race through interracial marriage!
STORY FOR JEWS
we find the great contradiction in Jewish teachings.
While preaching the most extreme forms of race-mixing at inter-religious meetings
and on college campuses in the press, on T.V. and Hollywood, the Jews tell their own youth a completely different story
in the confines of the Synagogue.
Dr. Immanuel Jakobovits, Chief Rabbi of England, said in the “New York Times”:
“Intensive Jewish education must cover youths between
13 and 18”.
He said that unless they are warned of the dangers of inter-marriages:
“The whole fabric of the Jewish structure will suffer
irreparable harm and damage.”
Rabbi Pesach Z. Levovitz, president of the Rabbinical Council of America
said in the “New York Times,” Jewish;
“religious leaders must exercise all of their influence to stop mixed marriages between Jews and non-Jews.
Those who marry out of the faith disappear within the preponderant Christian religions and cultural community.”
DON’T DATE NON-JEWS
England’s Chief Rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits recently
made a visit to New York, and in point blank terms declared:
teenagers shouldn’t date non-Jews. … Interfaith marriage is something we view with horror, almost as apostasy.
For Jews the problem of intermarriage is the problem of sheer survival. Countless Jewish martyrs did not die for their faith
so that we might fritter away our heritage.”
We would like to ask the rabbi; What about White Christians whose countless
ancestors fought and died so that our race might be preserved? Is not the blood line of our people worth saving in the light
of the importance the Jews place on this question? The Jews are not called “bigots” and “race
prejudiced” when they fight against inter-marriage for their own kind. Yet, these same leftist Jews attack and
vilify every White Christian who dares stand up for racial purity for our folk.
JOSEPH POGÁNY alias SCHWARTZ.
A FAMOUS JEW who came to America from Moscow in 1928 to write the first
Civil Rights platform for the U. S. Communist Party.
DAVID GINSBURG. Wrote Riot Commission Report
charging Whites were responsible for Negro riots.
WHY THE JEWS SEEK THE MONGRELIZATION
OF THE WHITE CHRISTIAN PEOPLE
The most cleverly contrived scheme in the history of race relations is now being employed by the Jews to break
down the resistance of the White race. It is an elaborate plan to make White people ashamed of the color of our skin. It
is deliberately designed to give us an inferiority complex whereby we will feel compelled to bring about our own racial
destruction to rectify the superior position we naturally hold over the Black race.
It is even more clearly spelled out in a book written back in 1912 by a
Communist theoretician named Israel Cohen of London, England. It is titled, “A Racial Program
For The Twentieth Century” and has been published in the Congressional Record
of June 7, 1957, and even entered as a paid ad some years ago in the Atlanta newspapers by Gov. Lester Maddox
(then a prominent restaurant owner). Israel Cohen wrote:
“We must realize that our Party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the
consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mold them to the program
of the Communist Party. The terms colonialism and imperialism must be featured in our propaganda.
In America, we will aim for a subtle
victory. While inflaming the negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt
complex for their exploitation of the Negroes.
We will aid the negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life,
in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the negroes will be able to intermarry
with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”
SELF-HATE INSTILLED WITHIN WHITES
This is the most diabolical plan ever conceived, to instill “self-hate”
within White people so that we will embrace the Black race in order to “up-lift” them to our level (an
The plan goes much further and is a master hoax fostered by Jews
upon our people.
CHARGE WHITES GUILTY OF NEGROES’ CRIMES
In March of 1968 Lyndon Johnson’s “Commission
on Civil Disorder” issued their report on the bloody and destructive negro riots which swept many of
our major cities that previous summer. The full time staff director of the Commission was the Jew David Ginsburg.
With a $1 million dollar budget, and 200 employees Ginsburg spent 7 months ‘investigating’ the riots.
The final report, which he personally drafted found:
the filth, crime and slums in which the Negro lives, White institutions created it, White institutions maintain it, and
White society condones it — White racism is essentially responsible for the explosive mixture which has been accumulating
in our cities since the end of World War II.”
The crux of the million dollar report was that — WE WHITE
PEOPLE ARE TO BLAME FOR THE NEGRO RIOTS!
Many Americans openly expressed their outrage at Ginsburg’s findings. But most
people missed the real point in question, that this was a brazen attempt to instill an inferiority complex
in masses of White Christian Americans in one grand sweep.
We are supposed to feel guilty for the oppression Blacks have experienced
in the past. Now we should want to throw ourselves at the feet of the negroes and beg for their forgiveness. The Jews would
like for our vast masses to adopt the attitude of the young White girl from San Francisco, whose story was reported in The
Thunderbolt. She said she was looking for a negro man to marry, so that in her own individual way she could
try to make up some of the oppression Negroes had suffered.
Of course the truth of the story is that the American negro has a far higher
standard of living than negroes have in ANY of their own countries in Africa. We do not owe the Black man anything. In fact
the negro has shown us the height of ingratitude to the fact that we lifted them out of jungle savagery, gave them sanitary
homes for the first time, jobs, welfare, free medical care, poverty aid and free food.
But, David Ginsburg says that we have not
Riot Commission Report advocates raising the negro to a real life of luxury by the following methods:
- The spending of $10 billion a year on poverty aid and welfare.
- Create 2 million federal
jobs for Blacks. Guarantee every negro a job.
- Provide a Guaranteed annual wage to all negroes
who do not want to work.
- Build 6 million new dwellings for negroes in White suburbs with either
subsidized or free rent.
This is Ginsburg’s
plan to chain the White worker to a lifetime of tax slavery to make the negro an elite class of citizens to whom we third
class Whites owe a free living.
NEW JERSEY’S LITTLE RIOT COMMISSION
Also in 1968, former New Jersey Gov. Richard J. Hughes appointed a “blue ribbon”
committee to investigate the bloody Newark riots. Once again a Jew named Sanford Jaffe, wound up as executive
director of this commission. You guessed it, he also found that White people were guilty of the crimes of the blacks! Sounds
unbelievable, even insane, yet when you control the news media, you can make the right seem wrong and change lies into truth.
The Jaffe Commission
found the following:
Guardsmen used excessive force in shooting rioters and looters.
- Police antagonize negroes, thus
encouraging them to disorder.
- More Black police are needed as well as civilian review boards.
- Elimination of bail is needed so negroes can be released from jail with less difficulty.
point is quoted word for word because it is so hard to believe anyone would claim this:)
“Widespread violence in the nation’s urban slums would have happened
sooner had not the Negro been patient and forbearing.”
- Jaffe’s final point absolved
the negro of any blame for the riots and said there was no organized conspiracy behind the rioting.
COMMUNIST PARTY FOUGHT FOR RACE MIXING
The 1928 Civil Rights Program of the U. S. Communist
Party was written by Joseph Pogany. This was the first [party] in America to adopt a civil rights
program and the major parties copied them after World War Two.
Pogany was a Jew, born in Moscow and sent to America in 1928 to help build
the U. S. Communist Party. Using the alias Joseph Schwartz, he wrote the following
program which the Reds adopted and distributed all over America.
OFFICIAL 1928 COMMUNIST PARTY PROGRAM
- Abolition of the whole system of race discrimination and insure full racial equality.
Negroes the right to vote.
- Abolish all Jim Crow laws and forbid discrimination against Negroes
in selling or renting houses.
- Abolish all laws forbidding intermarriage of persons of different
- Assure full integration of public schools and universities.
admittance of Negroes to railway stations, waiting rooms, hotels, restaurants and theatres.
integration of the Army and Navy.
- Allow negroes to join all labor unions.
- Equal employment opportunity for Negroes.
single one of the Jew Pogany’s original Platform points have today been adopted and put in force by both of the Jew
influenced Democratic and Republican Parties.
JEWS BACK THE BLACK REVOLUTION
Some people find it difficult to understand how a millionaire Jew can be a staunch supporter of the Black Militant
Communist Revolution. It is because of their Jewish nature according to one of the richest Jews in America, Max Fisher of
Detroit. Max Fisher owns the Marathon Oil Co. and the Fisher Theater chain. He sits on
the board of directors of Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. and Michigan Bell Telephone Co.,
is chairman of Fruehauf Trucking Co., a director in Allen Industries and Safran
Printing Co. and a partner in the huge $150 million Somerset Park apartment project in Troy, Michigan.
Being a militant revolutionary
has not stopped him from declaring himself a Republican, and he is George Romney’s chief campaign fund raiser. He
recently represented President Nixon at a meeting of Jewish leaders in New York City.
He told them Nixon had assured him Israel
would receive all the aid she needs. On the negro question, no one can claim to be more radical than Max Fisher, who the
“Detroit News” of Feb. 23, 1969 quotes:
“My fellow Jews must enter the great American Equal Rights Revolution. The growth
of the Black Power concept is healthy because there was no leadership before. Militancy and turmoil are good, because it
shows that the Negro is himself concerned and involved. We are in a revolution and the Negro has to be allowed to develop.
I think that through my Jewishness I have a feeling of what the Negro wants. It comes from an empathy that springs from my
Or take the Jew Saul Alinsky whose activities are financed by the Jew owned Midas Muffler Co. Alinsky
heads a radical group called F.I.G.H.T. They led riotous picketings and demonstrations by Blacks demanding
jobs at the Kodak Film Co. in Rochester, N. Y. They succeeded in blackjacking the company into giving them
hundreds of jobs.
Alinsky now operates a school for Black revolutionaries— still financed by the Jewish owned Midas Muffler
Corp. Recently he said:
“Just think of
all the hell we kicked up in the past with only four or five organizers. Now we will be turning them out by the hundreds.”
NAACP — A JEWISH ORGANIZATION
Last but not least is the NAACP. The largest and best financed
of all the groups fighting for the mongrelization of the White race. This organization has never had a negro
as its head.
the first 35 years of the NAACP’s formal existence it was run by two millionaire Jewish brothers. Joel Spingarn
was president of the NAACP from 1920 until his death in 1939. Thereupon his brother Arthur Spingarn ran it
until 1966. Due to old age, he turned the presidency over to Kivie Kaplan, a millionaire Jew shoe manufacturer
from Boston, Mass. He heads it to this day. Roy Wilkins is merely his secretary and front dressing for the
real mastermind behind the NAACP’s massive legal offensive which is almost solely responsible for the destruction
of all the South’s laws and traditions keeping the races separate, including all the major school mixing decisions,
were suits brought by Jack Greenberg, Jewish head of the NAACP Legal and Defense Fund.
The Jews visualize themselves in a never
ending cold war with the White Christian people. They know that we are an independent and freedom loving people. The Jew
knows that our individualism springs from the restless creative spirit of our race. They know that eventually our White
race will revolt against Jewish economic, cultural and racial domination of our people.
They have but one hope, to put the White
race to sleep through assimilation with the lazy, mindless, leaderless, shiftless and slave-like Negro race. As Mulattoes
our future descendants would make obedient workers under Jewish masters.
The Jews are organized to prevent assimilation of their racial blood with
either us White Christians or the Blacks.
They stand to be the only race in the future which will be mentally alert if mongrelization
conquers our unborn descendants to come.
We are now, TODAY in a life and death STRUGGLE for racial survival. We are faced by a tight
knit, political machine which is hell bent upon using its money power to destroy our White Folk. The time has come for every
White man, woman and child in America to take his stand. The National States Rights Party provides our fellow
White brothers with the best fighting attack program in existence to defeat this evil conspiracy.
Remember that your life upon this earth
is but a very short one. We are placed here to create a decent and wholesome society in which our children can be raised
and propagate. It is our duty to keep the race separate so as to provide for the everlasting continuation of future generations.
This is our God given
mission upon this earth. Are you doing your part while there is yet still time to preserve the White race? It is a task
more important than your personal life itself. Sacrifice and struggle lie ahead and we must be prepared to give our all
for the SALVATION of God’s real ‘Chosen People’, —The White Race. Our White Race is responsible
for the concepts of Liberty and Civilization which we have given to the entire world.
Always remember the following quotation from the late Sen. Theodore
G. Bilbo who fought all his life to maintain the separation of the races:
“If our buildings, our highways, our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities
should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed,
we could rear sons who would redeem our power.
if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness
of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a negroid America
as would be redemption and restoration of the White man’s blood which had been mixed with that of the negro.”
RIGHTS BILL AUTHOR
Congressman “Manny” Emanuel Celler (above),
Zionist Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee is one of the boastful authors and defenders of the infamous
Celler “CIVIL RIGHTS BILL,” which was prepared as part of the plan. to disorganize and condition
the U.S. for the Communist take-over.
He gave a “BOYCOTT AMERICANS” speech in the House of Representatives
on Aug. 28, 1957, which appears in the Congressional Record of Sept. 11, 1957, on page A-7475. It
seems he is more concerned with the welfare of ISRAEL than that of the U.S.
Click on this text to watch "Immigration and the Old Indian Trick"...
Please watch these:
Who's behind the race mixing agenda in advertising?
"Diversity" Is a Weapon Against White People
"Ethno-States Will Never Work"
Quotes from Jews about geocoding the Whites
How old advanced civilizations were destroyed by race-mixing
The JEWS planned White genocide since before the World Wars
Rabbi: "Biological Jews behind Open Borders for White Countries
The Rape of Finland: Multiculturalism
F. Roger Devlin, PhD
The Occidental Observer
Abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
As Muslim gangs run amok in an orgy of rape and murder, questions are being asked:
Who is behind the plot of out-of-control mass immigration? what other countries are on the hit list of the People Destroyers?
“A 2018 study by the Finnish Police Academy found that 93% of rapes in Finland in 2016 had been committed by
men from Islamic countries.” — Roger Devlin, PhD. (See also here)
Finns enjoy an unusually high-trust society. Longtime
British resident Ed Dutton describes unmanned roadside vegetable stands that operate on the honor system, with customers
reliably leaving the correct price for what they take. Travelers need not purchase a ticket before boarding a train; everyone
happily pays the conductor as he comes through. At least until recently, girls in outlying villages could safely hitchhike
into larger towns on Saturday nights.
Oulu (pronounced Oh-loo)
is the largest city in northern Finland. It tends to be a dull place, and residents like it that way:
“Very little crime, very little conflict; very little to report:
Everyone eating the same kind of food, wearing the same kind of clothes, following the same cultural traditions: trusting,
safe, predictable. The perfect place to raise a child.”
By 2005, however, the city had begun accepting small numbers of Muslim ‘refugees.’ That
“a 30-year-old worker for
the Finnish Lutheran Church had been naïve enough to get talking to a group of Muslim men in a bar and, worse still,
go back to their flat. She was rewarded for her friendliness towards these guests by having her clitoris cut off with a
pair of scissors which were then inserted into her vagina.”
During the next couple of years, several local women were raped by Muslim men in city parks. By
2008, the trend was being reported in a national tabloid—which, however, failed to mention that all of the assaults
had been carried out by Middle Eastern men. Oulu’s local daily, Kaleva, stopped reporting perpetrators’
names. As in other Western countries, Finnish journalists tend to be aggressively cosmopolitan leftists who despise the
folks back home, ordinary Finns with “their simple desire for a picturesque wooden house close to a lake; their contentment
living in a society where people mostly think in the same way.” If such narrow-minded yokels were to learn what was
really going on, the multicultural project might be threatened!
the names of Muslim criminals were being redacted from police and court press releases as well. Official reports spoke only
of men “of foreign background,” as if Finnish women were being attacked by German tourists or Japanese guest
lecturers from the local university. But the authorities knew the truth: a 2018 a study by the Finnish Police Academy
found that 93% of rapes of foreigners in Finland in 2016 had been committed by men from Islamic countries.
In the spring of 2015, Juha Sipilä was elected Prime Minster of Finland on a platform
of admitting fewer refugees. But in September of the same year, once Angela Merkel had opened the floodgates, he did an
about face and offered refuge to 32,478 persons, mainly young Muslim men. Sipilä even persuaded some Finns to take such
men into their own houses, promising to do so himself (he never did).
Within a month of their arrival in northern Finland, 60 of these supposedly desperate asylum seekers were staging
a protest in front of Oulu’s police station: they didn’t care for the traditional Finnish food offered at the
local refugee center. Authorities obediently changed the menu. The incidence of rape and sexual assault in Northern
Finland quickly increased. The first gang rape occurred as early as November 2015 in the town of Kempele, a few miles from
Oulu, where several ‘refugees’ had been settled; the victim was a fifteen-year-old girl.
As official sources continued to suppress information about the perpetrators, a local
couple established a reputation as an accurate source of information. Junes Lokka (b. 1979), a half-Moroccan computer programmer,
and his fiancée Tiina Wiik (b. 1985), who blogs under the name ‘Swan of Tuonela,’ began livestreaming
phone-ins and interviews on YouTube. They also maintained contacts with ‘Alt Right’ figures worldwide:
both Jared Taylor and Kevin MacDonald, for instance, have appeared on their internet shows. In 2017, Lokka won election to
the Oulu city council as an independent, with Wiik serving as vice-councilor.
In November, 2018, two local fathers set a trap for a Muslim molester operating in a city park.
“They’d called the police so that he’d effectively
be caught in, or almost in, the act. But, amazingly, the police didn’t seem particularly interested. Although they
arrested the diversifier, they didn’t even bother to check the man’s phone nor search his flat. If anything,
they appeared irritated by what the fathers had done.”
One of these fathers shared his story with Junes Lokka, who contacted the local court. Courts in
Finland, unlike the police or reporters, are legally obliged to reveal the identities of all persons accused. Lokka found
a list of seven men, besides the one caught by the two fathers, scheduled to appear on November 28th to face charges
of rape or sexual assault: ‘Rahmani Gheibali, Yosefi Shiraqa, Mirzad Javad, Barhum Abdullhadi, Humad Osman Ahmed Mohamed,
Mohamed Ali Osman… —all of them post-2015 arrivals from the Middle East. Their victims had been as young as
ten. The local newspaper, Kaleva, certainly knew about it, since they receive the court records every day by email,
but had colluded to hide what was happening from their readers.
realized he had stumbled upon an organized ‘grooming gang’ of the type familiar from Rotherham in England. Most
of the men operated at a local shopping mall, chatting up under-age Finnish girls in English or broken Finnish and luring
them away with alcohol. He published the list of names and charges online, and word spread quickly. On December 4th, an
alternative newspaper reported the full details. It became a national scandal, with authorities rushing to deplore the crimes
they had previously attempted to keep secret.
offenses in Oulu are appalling,” said the turncoat Prime Minister responsible for letting the criminals into the country.
The Interior Minister chimed in with promises of tougher laws to deport foreign criminals, but the public knew that only
a few months before he had been saying Finland could happily take 10,000 Muslim ‘refugees’ annually, rather
than the usual 1,000.
“Oulu was in shock, not so much that there were Muslim rapes — they’d had to deal with
that since at least 2005 — but that these could be systematically organised, directed against underage girls,
and covered-up by the authorities. (See here. LD) On the night of 6th December, the 101st anniversary of Finnish independence, there was a torch-lit parade of nationalists
through Oulu. There had been no such thing in previous years. They made their way to the city’s cemetery where, watched
over by police, I witnessed them give tense, angry speeches to the applause of a largely working-class audience.
“On the afternoon of 10th December, roughly 100 furious Finns braved the cold, sleet and
an intimidatingly heavy police presence to protest against the cover up and the rapes, in front of Oulu city hall. In thirteen
years of living in Finland, I had never witnessed anything like it.
are stereotypically trusting, cooperative, taciturn and desperate not to offend. Yet, as councilors walked into the town
hall that dark evening, they were greeted with screams of ‘traitor!’ At one point, a brave Muslim construction
worker arose and began to defend Islam from the criticisms which some speakers were vociferously levelling against it. Hissed
and jeered by the furious Finns, he was dragged from the steps and beaten up, with the police marching him away, not daring
to inflame the mob by arresting those who’d slapped him around until he squealed.”
Two weeks later, on 26th December, the windows of Oulu’s small mosque were smashed.
The presiding Imam, Dr. Abdul Mannan, is a Social Democratic vice-councilor in town. He is also a Wahhabi who advocates
the adoption of sharia law in Finland. In 2017 his son-in-law was killed fighting for ISIS in Iraq.
In early January 2019, more local grooming cases were revealed, bringing the number of
accused to sixteen. It also came to light that a 14-year-old girl had hanged herself in October, 2018 after being raped
by Muslim men. Oulu’s police took to the newspapers to deny the story, but a week later they were forced to admit that
the ‘refugees’ had, indirectly, claimed their first life.
“The next day, roughly 50 members of the vigilante group Soldiers of Odin rallied at [the local shopping
mall] — now heavily police-patrolled and clear of Muslim men — and marched through the snow blanketed city.
In the evening, to quell the public mood, both the Prime Minister and the Interior Minister gave press conferences about
the situation at Oulu city hall where MSM journalists asked them easy questions.”
The very next day, the first reports emerged of Muslim grooming activity in the capital,
Helsinki. In Oulu as well, new cases kept coming to light. On 20th February, police commissioner Markus Kiiskanen announced
that the police were investigating 29 ‘foreign’ men for child rape and sexual assault in Oulu. Even at this stage,
no one in any official position was bothering to clarify that the ‘foreigners’ involved were not Norwegians.
The scandal became international news, with British dissidents Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson separately travelling to
Finland to meet Lokka and Wiik.
Such, in brief, are the events
that inspired the book under review, all related in its first chapter. In the rest of the work, Dutton uses evolutionary
psychology to shed light on why the rape epidemic occurred and why the Finnish authorities have responded to it so weakly.
The central reason is disarmingly simple, though its causes reach deep into the Finns’ evolutionary history: Finns
are too nice.
Visitors to Finland strongly agree in their
characterization of the locals as quiet, unemotional, hard-working, honest and rule-following, stoical, and anxious to please.
They also have the highest average intelligence in Europe.
traits characterize Northeast Asians as well, and Finns have around 10% Northeast Asian admixture. Until as recently as the
1960s, Finns were sometimes actually classed as ‘Mongoloids.’ This was an exaggeration, but the Finno-Ugric
peoples do represent a genetic cline in that direction.
social anxiety and a desire to please are associated with low self-esteem. Dutton recounts that foreigners like himself often
get asked what they think about the Finns: “this concern about the opinion of others is a marker of high Agreeableness
and low self-esteem, as it is people with these traits who are most concerned about the feelings of others.”
A Finnish sociologist named Tarja Laine has studied the national inferiority complex in
“She claims Finns are often
‘discontented with the nation’ and ‘ashamed of themselves.’ Laine argues that there is a history
of self-stigmatization in Finland, because Finnishness was defined as ‘inferior to the rest of Europe’ [and]
also notes how deeply concerned Finns were about what foreigners would think of them when they hosted the summer Olympics
Women with low self-esteem
are more anxious to please the men with whom they interact, and thus susceptible to the attentions of seducers.
Finland has historically been a poor nation. Famine carried off 20% of the population
as recently as 1866–68, and the country remained predominantly agricultural until the 1950s. This means that Darwinian
natural selection remained strong until quite recently. The harsher the environment, the more strongly men must be adapted
to it in order to survive. For this reason, Finns have an exceptionally small gene pool.
This means fewer individual outliers, whether for intelligence or personality. The rarity of outlier
high intelligence, along with high social anxiety and conformism, explains why Finland has produced fewer men of outstanding
achievement than the country’s high average IQ would lead one to expect.
Dutton’s previous work on the personality traits typical of genius indicate such men must have
“the ability to think unconventionally, to withstand criticism
and even ridicule, and to have the self-confidence and doggedness to pursue very hard work for many years with little or
no support and sometimes in the face of outright antagonism. That kind of person tends to be bold, critical, idiosyncratic
and unconventional, which is often perceived by people as annoying, arrogant, controversial, and provocative.”
The reader can readily see this is very nearly the opposite of the personality type which
we have described as predominating in Finland. High social anxiety and conformism, along with a relative lack of personality
outliers, means very few Finns are bold enough to ‘rock the boat’ and question things. It may sound ironic, but
it is quite possibly not an accident that the Finn most responsible for blowing the lid on Muslim grooming gangs is half-Moroccan.
Finland’s Lutheran church is now in free-fall. As recently as 1980, 90% of Finns
were still members; today the figure is 69%, and the decline seems to be accelerating. Dutton reports that in his early days
in Oulu, homosexuality was seldom discussed, or it was dismissed with the remark that ‘gays go to Helsinki.’
But by 2018, the town had its own annual gay pride parade graced by the presence of the local Lutheran clergymen. He also
shares an anecdote about a young female student of his who submitted an essay arguing that the voluntary religious instruction
still offered at Finnish schools be abolished in favor of compulsory multicultural education, the gist of which would be
that the races are equal and there is no God.
So much for
the weak Finnish response to the Muslim rape campaign against their women. What might evolutionary psychology have to say
about the behavior of the Muslims themselves?
Any man living
as a Middle Eastern ‘refugee’ in Finland or any other Western country is in a position of extremely low social
status, and thus quite unattractive to females. On the basis of nationality alone, many Western women would never consider
marrying even a socioeconomically successful Middle Eastern man. In such a context, rape becomes an attractive option—especially
gang rape, as this affords protection of a gang, lowers the risk of prosecution, and means the victim can be more easily
Rape asserts dominance not just over the females
themselves, but also over the males on the opposing side. Dutton reports:
“[Rape] destroys their morale and undermines their confidence, because the conquerors assert dominance
and control over the central resource for future existence, namely the wombs of [their] women. Rape can be a deliberate
war strategy, because it creates deep trauma and insecurity among the victims and their networks, helping to undermine their
ability to defend themselves.”
themselves as jihadis waging war against Finnish infidels is a convenient way for Muslim refugees to salve their battered
self-esteem, and rape in the context of Holy War is explicitly endorsed by the Koran.
Dutton concludes that if a large number of very low-status males from the same ethnic group are
thrust into a homogenous, high-trust community of a different ethnicity, the predictable result will be rape: ‘Oulu’s
Muslim Grooming Scandal was inevitable the moment significant numbers of young, single Muslim males were accommodated in
The near future does not look bright. Based
on the research of the late Finnish political scientist Tatu Vanhanen, Muslims are not going to integrate, and will come
to perceive Finns as their enemies (if they do not already). Finns uncommitted to multiculturalism will start to mirror
this behavior, and the country may spiral into a low-level civil war. Meanwhile, elite Finns who cling to multicultural thinking
will vye with one another to demonstrate how deeply they care about ‘refugees’ supposedly being victimized by
their bigoted co-ethnics. This will lead to a collapse of trust within the ethnic majority. Many ordinary Finns already
distrust the news media and government, and this will intensify as well.
Finnish vigilantes like the Soldiers of Odin are already patrolling the streets. The welfare state will become unsustainable
under such circumstances, depending as it does on a sense of national kinship. The economy can be expected to deteriorate
and crime to increase, even among ethnic Finns.
In the longer
run, however, social trends that cannot go on forever can be relied upon to stop. As Finland becomes a more stressful and
dangerous place to live, some sort of religious revival is likely, which will both raise the native birthrate and steel
Finns’ resolve for the struggle. Nationalist parties will grow. As Dutton notes:
“Computer models have demonstrated that once 25% of a group adhere to
a counter-cultural viewpoint, such as ethnocentrism currently is, and become activists fervently advocating it, they tip
the opinion of the entire group towards their own. And all else controlled for, the more ethnocentric group will always
triumph. As discussed, Finns are high in conformism, so when the country ‘flips’ from multiculturalism back
to nationalism, it will happen very quickly.”
Observers appalled at the apparent weakness of the Finns’ initial response to Muslim rape gangs will do well
to recall the ferocity this nation has historically demonstrated in defending itself, and bear in mind the poet’s
warning: Beware the fury of a patient man.
LD: According to the recently released World Happiness Report
by the UN, Finland was nominated the “happiest place on earth” in 2019 for the second year in a row. When quizzed by reporters, most Finns disagreed
with this finding and said they had little to feel happy about, given the rape epidemic and the deadly virus of mass immigration
created by the People Destroyers. Watch this video and decided for yourself: Who is to blame for throwing open this Pandora’s
box of evils?
Jewish Involvement in Contemporary Refugee and Migrant Organizations
“The Tree of Life Synagogue
victims died so that refugees could live.”
Rob Eshman, Jewish Journal
“We seek advantage through our dead. We make our dead
your problem. The meaning we find in our deceased we find as a courtesy to you, to help you, to
change your societies for the “better.””
David Cole, Takimag
Refugee and asylum legislation is
now a key policy area for many major immigrant-receiving countries. The UN Refugee Agency estimates there are currently
28.5 million refugees and asylum seekers worldwide, with most originating in South Sudan, Afghanistan, and Syria. The world’s
largest refugee hosting countries are located near the epicenters of those countries experiencing difficulties, and include
Turkey (3.5 million), Uganda (1.4 million), Pakistan (1.4 million), Lebanon (1 million), and the Islamic Republic of Iran
(979,400). More incongruous, however, is the fact refugee and asylum populations from these same troubled areas have exploded
in the West, in countries both geographically and culturally very distant from exporting nations. Since 1990, the new refugee
population of Austria has climbed from 34,948 to 115,197; in Belgium from 25,911 to 42,128; in Finland from 2,348 to 20,713;
in France from 193,000 to 337,143; in Germany from 816,000 to 970,302; in Ireland from 360 to 6,324; in Italy from 10,840
to 167,260; in Luxembourg from 687 to 1,995; in the Netherlands from 17,337 to 103,818; in Norway from 19,581 to 59,160;
in Sweden from 109,663 to 240,889; in Switzerland from 40,943 to 92,995; and in the United Kingdom from 43,632 to 121,766.
Increased lobbying on behalf of refugees, and increased quotas for refugee admissions, are now a very significant part of
the West’s overall approach to migration. The only significant current exceptions to these trends are Hungary, where
the number of new refugees has dropped from 45,123 to 5,641, and the United States and Canada, both of which were home in
2017 to roughly half the number of new refugees they hosted in 1990.
In the United States, the lower figures can be attributed
to clauses within the Refugee Act of 1980, which both defined a refugee and gave the President (in consultation with Congress)
the power to determine the number of refugees accepted to the United States each year. That figure currently stands at 45,000.
The history of the Refugee Act can be traced to the 1975 State Department, where Lionel Rosenblatt, a Jewish diplomat and
future President of Refugees International, was working on persuading Ted Kennedy to back legislation providing a visa program
for refugees from Indochina in the wake of the Vietnam War and mass executions in Cambodia. Stephen Young, then a recently
qualified D.C. lawyer who worked with Rosenblatt, recalled that “In 1975, no one had any claim to enter the U.S. as a refugee,” though, since the introduction of the
1952 McCarran-Walter Act, certain foreign aliens could be “paroled” into the country at the discretion of the
Attorney General. In 1975 alone, Rosenblatt helped relocate approximately 140,000 Indochinese to the United States by working
within the existing structure.
As the number of claims under McCarran-Walter
increased, decision-making power was increasingly dispersed to the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, and
International Law, then chaired (1967–1979) by Jewish Democrat Joshua Eilberg. As figures like Rosenblatt and Eilberg
began agitating for a more fluid yet formal legislative approach to the refugee question, Young recalls one conversation
where Kennedy informed Rosenblatt he would only be willing to back legislation that would accept a maximum of 150,000 Indochinese
refugees. Kennedy was presumably only too aware that both Congress and the American public were opposed to the acceptance
of significant numbers of Indochinese migrants. In the final event, however, the Refugee Act, drafted by Jewish Congresswoman
Elizabeth Holtzman and given a public face by Ted Kennedy — the same Ted Kennedy who gave a public face to the 1965
immigration act — provided visas for more than 1.7 million Indochinese in the period between 1980 and 1989.
In July 2018, Holtzman penned a scathing letter of resignation from her then role at the Department of Homeland Security, expressing disgust with the immigration, refugee,
and asylum policies of Donald Trump, and claiming, quite contrary to all available evidence, that the United States in 1980
had “welcomed refugees” and had “readily accepted and absorbed” them. In reality, in those areas
where they settled, Indochinese refugees were a significant drain on welfare and other forms of public assistance, barely
assimilated, and “overloaded the public schools and medical facilities and were blamed for a rise in the rate of tuberculosis
and other diseases.”
The conspicuous presence of influential Jewish diplomats and politicians in the formulation
of the Refugee Act of 1980, together with the obvious dissonance between Elizabeth Holtzman’s presentation of the Act
and the reality of it’s impact, should be contextualized within the question of ethnic conflict in immigration policy
more generally. In particular, it should be contextualized within Kevin MacDonald’s discussion of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration policy, in the course of which MacDonald concludes that “Jewish
organizations have uniformly advocated high levels of immigration of all racial and ethnic groups into Western societies
and have also advocated a multicultural model for these societies.” The posited reasons for this uniformity include the historical Jewish interest in securing immigration rights for Jews,
and the fact that pluralism is conducive to increased feelings of Jewish security — a state of affairs in which Jews
become just one among many ethnic groups instead of a sole outgroup in a predominantly White, Christian nation. The theory
allows for exceptions to the rule, in cases where Jewish interests are interpreted differently by a minority of Jews. Further,
Jewish success in advancing pluralistic goals are said to be rooted in a number of Jewish traits, especially high verbal
intelligence and a tendency toward in-group networking. This theoretical framework would seem to predict that Jews would
be overrepresented in positions of influence within contemporary refugee, asylum, and similar pro-immigration or “immigrants
rights” organizations. The following study of a number of such organizations strongly confirms all aspects of MacDonald’s
theoretical framework, and offers a rejoinder to some recent criticisms of it.
Perhaps the most high-profile recent criticism of MacDonald’s
theory of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration policy is that of Nathan Cofnas, a graduate student in the philosophy
of biology at the University of Oxford. Cofnas offers an alternative theory in the form of his “default hypothesis.”
In his own summary of the default hypothesis, Cofnas states: “Because of their above average intelligence and concentration
in influential urban areas, Jews will be overrepresented in all intellectual movements and activities that are not overtly
anti-Semitic.” As such, while Jews may be overrepresented in pro-immigration, pro-pluralism organizations and movements,
the default hypothesis insists that they will also be overrepresented in anti-immigration or restrictionist movements (that
are not anti-Semitic) also. There is an inherent implication that these overrepresentations will be, more or less, to the
Before moving to a discussion of findings in relation to Jewish involvement
in contemporary refugee and migrant organizations, it is first necessary to test the default hypothesis by examining the
scale and nature of Jewish involvement in contemporary anti-immigration organizations that are not anti-Semitic. To date,
the only evidence offered by Cofnas in relation to such a test is the list of scheduled speakers at a single 1994 American
Renaissance conference (where four of the ten speakers were Jewish). While an interesting, if perfectly explicable, statistic, when compared with the extensive discussion of Jewish involvement
in shaping U.S. immigration policy before 1965, and the broader contemporary context of widespread and intensive Jewish
activism on behalf of pro-pluralist, pro-immigration causes, Cofnas’s riposte can only be described, kindly, as entirely
inadequate. For the purposes of this study, the senior staff directories of the three most prominent anti-immigration think
tanks currently in operation in United States were consulted. The three main anti-immigration organizations are the Center
for Immigration Studies (CIS), NumbersUSA, and Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). In the following the thumbnail
sketches of these organizations was provided by a long-time activist against immigration with insider’s insight; figures
for Jewish representation are mine.
FAIR: FAIR has been
described by former board members as “Dan Stein’s 401(k) plan.” It scarfs up most of the immigration patriot
money available, especially from timid Establishment foundations, does essentially nothing and spends a lot of its time
undercutting and blocking potential rivals. Stein has been running FAIR since 1988, i.e. has presided over a period of continuous
defeats for the immigration patriot movement. Activists seriously debate whether he is a mole.
At FAIR, four of 52 senior staff members are Jewish, including President Dan Stein, Media Director Ira
Mehlman, and Board members Sarah G. Epstein and Paul Nachman. This is a Jewish representation of approximately 7.7%. Across
all three major anti-immigration organizations, Jews occupy 5.13% of senior roles. This is in fact a generous figure to
settle on as an approximate broader working figure, because Jews were totally absent from the senior levels of every smaller
CIS: The CIS does a lot of worthy studies, but is determinedly PC, presumably
to maintain viability in the MSM/ Beltway, which limits its ability to appeal to a wider audience. The $PLC named it a Hate
Group anyway a couple of years ago (as was FAIR, for no apparent reason), after which its main spokesman, Mark Krikorian,
has been a little more daring, especially on twitter. Senior positions at CIS are listed in Center Staff, Board of Directors,
and Center Fellows, totaling 37 individuals. Of these individuals, two are Jewish: Chief Litigation Counsel Julie Axelrod
and Senior Policy Analyst Stephen Steinlight, although Mark Krikorian is their main public spokesperson. This is a Jewish
representation of 5.41%.
NumbersUSA: NumbersUSA is
a worthy organization, and its Congressional Grade card system excellent. However, its founder ,Roy Beck, is apparently planning
to retire, so the future is uncertain. There are no Jewish members of staff listed at NumbersUSA. But we will assume that Jews have an average representation in the anti-immigrant politics of around 5%.
Given that the Jewish proportion of the population of the United States is assumed to be
around 2.2-2.5%, the six individual Jews at CIS and FAIR do technically amount to an overrepresentation at the top level,
albeit rather modest in light of the representation of Jews active in legal and associated professions more generally, not
to mention Cofnas’s flamboyant panegyric to Jewish intellectual and organizational talent. Taking into account an
allowance for any such Jewish representation in anti-immigration politics on the grounds of alternative perceptions of specifically
Jewish interests, discussed in the MacDonald thesis, a search was conducted on commentary on immigration given by these
figures, or other indications as to their ideological leanings that may be evident in their broader work.
Working within MacDonald’s theoretical framework, in which concerns about anti-Semitism
will be primary among Jews of all political hues, a reasonable prediction would be that Jewish representation in anti-immigration
movements would be both exceptional in the larger picture of the immigration debate, and, rather than being concerned about
traditional America as a whole, will be focussed almost exclusively on the exclusion of those immigrants or refugees perceived
to be anti-Semitic, especially Muslims from the Middle East. In other words, such representations will be based on what
might be termed renegade, minority, or abnormal perceptions of Jewish interests, rather than shared concerns or earnest
sympathies with the greater mass of the native population.
In this regard, Ira Mehlman and Stephen
Steinlight are especially interesting figures. In a 2012 interview with Peter Beinart, Mehlman is unambiguous in telling his interviewer: “current mass immigration policies are harming the interests of American Jews … Mass immigration
is introducing large numbers of new people to American society who hold far less favorable opinions of Jews.” Similarly,
in 2001 Steinlight penned an essay for the Center for Immigration Studies bluntly titled “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.”
In the course of the essay, Steinlight condemns earlier periods of nativism and restrictionism in the United States, and
strongly promotes pluralistic and multicultural ideals. In fact, Steinlight’s only apparent grievance with existing
immigration structures is that they have resulted in the fact
at some point in the
next 20 years Muslims will outnumber Jews, and that Muslims with an “Islamic agenda” are growing active politically
through a widespread network of national organizations. This is occurring at a time when the religion of Islam is being
supplanted in many of the Islamic immigrant sending countries by the totalitarian ideology of Islamism of which vehement
anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism form central tenets.
sentiments are essentially neoconservative, itself of course a largely Jewish ideological movement in conflict with native
interests, and are entirely predictable within the basic theoretical framework offered by MacDonald, while doing little
or nothing to corroborate the default hypothesis offered by Cofnas. Steinlight and Mehlman are primarily concerned by potential
increases in anti-Semitism and a decline in Jewish political clout, and not with any broader implications of pluralism,
multiculturalism, or White demographic decline.
Similar issues emerge when one considers
another issue raised by Cofnas, putatively in support of his default hypothesis. This is the presence of Jewish academics
active in what might be termed “race realism,” or genetic determinism, and the apparent fact that Jews have been
strongly overrepresented among high-profile advocates of hereditarianism. Cofnas writes that “two out of seven of
the most prominent hereditarians were Jewish (Hans Eysenck and Richard Herrnstein), making Jews extremely overrepresented
in this group relative to their numbers in the general population.” Eysenck was half-Jewish, and Herrnstein married
outside his group. Neither appear to have lived in any kind of sustained Jewish milieu, and Eysenck made a point of explicitly
denying any affinity or connection to Jewishness. It is interesting that Cofnas does not place his contention in any kind of context, or seek to prove his theory of rough
parity in overrepresentations, by offering comparisons with overrepresentations among anti-hereditarian scholars.
Another issue, of course, is the obvious problem of extrapolating broader issues of politics
and identity from an academic’s career. An excellent case in this regard, from the Arts, is the Jewish literary critic
and Yale scholar Harold Bloom, who combines an obvious love and respect for the Western canon with a clear loathing for
cultural marxist or deconstructionist approaches in literary academia. Working within the Cofnas approach, Bloom would likely
be held up as an example of the default hypothesis at work. And yet Bloom is otherwise a committed pluralist who viewed
the Bush administration as verging on a theocratic fascist regime, and sees the Trump administration as a catastrophe. Bloom
writes: “Trump won the election because 62 million Americans live in a state of virtual reality. They no longer know what
facts are. They’re also consumed by resentment, racial prejudice, and the deep fear that their America is
vanishing forever. It will.” [Emphasis added] Another example, from the sciences, is the geneticist David Reich who
has done much to advance an understanding of genetic differences between the races, yet has also repeatedly insisted that
race is largely a “social construct.”
The point here is that MacDonald’s
thesis does not require every Jewish academic to cynically use his or her discipline to advance Jewish interests,
but that it does advance the idea that Jews will overwhelmingly see support for pluralism and mass immigration as being
in their interests. As such, not every Jewish scientist studying race differences will necessarily oppose multiculturalism,
racial pluralism, or mass immigration, and in fact very few will.
these points may highlight some of the more obvious problems with the default hypothesis offered by Cofnas, a more thorough
test is proposed by examining the scale of Jewish representation in contemporary refugee and migrant organizations.
Jewish Representation in Secular Contemporary Refugee and Migrant Organizations.
In contrast to the modest overrepresentation of Jews in anti-immigration groups (around
5%), Jews are nothing short of prolific in influential senior roles in contemporary refugee, asylum, and pro-migration organizations.
Significantly, Jews occupy the leadership of all four of the largest and most influential (and nominally secular) organizations
active in America today, the International Rescue Committee (President and CEO David Miliband), Refugees International (President
Eric P. Schwartz, formerly of HIAS), International Refugee Assistance Project (Director Becca Heller), and Human Rights
Watch (Executive Director Kenneth Roth, and Deputy Directors Iain Levine and Fred Abrahams).
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) is one of the most significant organizations bringing migrants
to the United States. In their countries of origin, refugees and their families are assisted by the IRC to prepare their
cases to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), compiling personal data and background information for security clearance.
Once their cases are approved, refugees are usually greeted at the airport by case workers from the IRC. The IRC then provides
these migrants with a home, furnishings, food, and any other assistance that might be required. The IRC operates 27 offices
across the United States, each offering food, housing, educational, and medical assistance. It also works closely with the
U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) Division of Refugee Assistance, which was reported in August 2018 as quietly removing its staff directory page. Consultations with the Internet Wayback Machine revealed the Director of the Office of Refugee
Resettlement to be one Carl Rubenstein, an alumnus of Tel Aviv Law School. In 2017, the IRC, in conjunction with Rubenstein’s ORR, resettled more than 51,000
migrants to the United States, and is currently a staunch lobbyist against current restrictions imposed by President Trump.
(Clockwise) Eric P. Schwartz, David Miliband, Iain Levine, Becca Heller, Kenneth Roth, Fred Abrahams)
Jews are very prominent in the leadership of the IRC. In addition to President and CEO David Miliband,
there are at least 30 Jews in senior positions within the organization including Morton I. Abramowitz (Overseer), Madeleine
Albright (Overseer), Laurent Alpert (Board Member), Clifford Asness (Board Member), Betsy Blumenthal (Overseer), Alan Batkin
(Chairman Emeritus and Board Member), Michael W. Blumenthal (Overseer), Susan Dentzer (Board Member), Evan G. Greenberg (Overseer),
Morton I. Hamburg (Overseer), Leila Heckman (Overseer), Karen Hein (Overseer), Marvin Josephson (Overseer),Alton Kastner
(Overseer and former Deputy Director), Henry Kissinger (Overseer), David A. Levine (Board Member), Reynold Levy (Overseer),
Robert E. Marks (Overseer), Sara Moss (Overseer), Thomas Nides (Board Member), Susan Petricof (Overseer), Gideon Rose (Overseer),
Thomas Schick (Chairman Emeritus and Board Member), James Strickler (Overseer), Sally Susman (Board Member), Mona Sutphen
(Board Member), Merryl Tisch (Board Member), Maureen White (Board Member), Jonathan Wiesner (Chairman Emeritus and Board
Member), William Winters (Overseer), and James D. Wolfensohn (Overseer).
Board of the IRC is comprised of 30 individuals, 12 of whom are Jewish, giving a Jewish representation at senior board level
of 40%. The Board of Overseers consists of 78 individuals, of whom at least 25 are Jewish, giving a Jewish representation
at this level of just over 32%. Since Jews occupy the position of CEO at the IRC, as well as 40% of the senior board and
32% of the lower board, it would be reasonable to assert that they enjoy a dominant role within the organization. This dwarfs any Jewish representation seen in anti-immigration groups.
International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) came to national prominence when Director Becca Heller brought a class action
suit against Trump’s January 2017 travel ban on individuals from certain Muslim countries. Heller, who has described herself as an “intensely neurotic Jew,” was active from the very earliest airport detentions, and was assisted by former
Yale law professor Michael Wishnie, also Jewish and a former member of Jews for Economic and Social Justice. Wishnie assembled “a group of students to draft a class action suit to represent not just IRAP’s two clients but anyonewho
had been detained.” The case was later also supported and taken up by the Immigrant’s Rights division of the
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) at the direction of its two Deputy Directors, Lee Gelernt and Judy Rabinowitz, both of whom are Jewish. At IRAP, there are three Jews on the board of the International Refugee Assistance Project: Jon
Finer, David Nierenberg, and Carl Reisner. The board consists of 12 members, giving a Jewish representation of 25%. Aside
from the board, other influential positions in the organization are held by Jews, including Deputy Legal Director (Lara
Finkbeiner), and legal fellow (Julie Kornfeld). Again, this is significantly greater than any Jewish representation seen
in anti-immigration groups.
Lee Gelernt & Judy Rabinowitz
Heller’s cause has very recently
been taken up by what the New York Times has euphemistically been called “Big Law” but what is in fact
a large number of Jewish legal conglomerates based in New York. Of these, the most significant is Paul Weiss in Manhattan,
led by Brad S. Karp, a Director of the American Friends of The Hebrew University and prize-winner from the Jewish Theological Seminary. Karp,
whose previous political adventures have included activism for homosexual marriage, has offered his company’s services pro bono, via counsels Emily Goldberg and Steven C. Herzog, to Gelernt and Rabinowitz in order to obstruct Trump’s anti-immigration measures, with Gelernt telling the New
York Times that Karp’s help was “indispensable.”
organizations are also reliant to a great extent on legal assistance provided by “immigrant’s rights”
organizations. Here too, Jews appear to be overrepresented by a large margin. For example, Jews comprise just over 14% of
overall listed staff at the National Immigrant Justice Center, and dominate the most senior positions. These include Director of Policy (Heidi Altman, former legal director for the
Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition), Associate Director of Legal Services (Ashley Huebner), Director of Litigation
(Charles Roth), and Associate Director of Litigation (Keren Zwick). Maria Blumenfeld, a former senior lawyer for NIJC departed
the group for another, almost identical organization, named Equal Justice Works, the Director of which is David Stern, also Jewish. Another interesting organization is The Immigrant Defense Project. Of the 15 listed senior staff, at least four are verifiably Jewish (Development Director Ariadna Rodenstein, Senior Staff
Attorney Genia Blaser, Supervising Attorney Marie Mark, and Supervising Attorney Andrew Wachtenheim). This is a Jewish representation
at senior level of over 26% – significantly greater than any Jewish representation seen in anti-immigration groups.
Of the five members of the Immigrant Defense Project’s Advisory Board, one, Peter Markowitz, is Jewish. Markowitz is
also listed as founder and director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic and a “George Soros Justice
Fellow and staff attorney at the Bronx Defenders from 2002 to 2005,” where he “developed the nation’s
first in-house full-service immigration project housed in a public defender office.” New Hampshire’s “Best Immigration Lawyer” is the Jewish Ron Abramson.
At the National Immigration Law Center, 18.5% of its staff lawyers are verifiably Jewish, and the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project is under Jewish Presidency (Ty Frankel) and 26% of its board is Jewish (Frankel, Ira Feldman, David Androff, Nathan Fidel,
and Andrew Silverman). The Immigrant Legal Resource Center was founded mostly via the efforts of Jewish lawyer Mark Silverman, described here as “one of the very first movement lawyers helping DREAMers.” Its board is under Jewish chairmanship (Lisa
Spiegel), and its Executive Director is Eric Cohen, also Jewish. One interesting member of its senior staff is Rose Cahn, also Jewish, who is a former Senior George Soros Justice Fellow at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the
San Francisco Bay Area. Cahn specializes in what she calls “post-conviction relief for immigrants,” which is
rather florid way of saying that she specializes in helping foreign criminals get into, and remain in, the United States.
Other senior staff members include Donna Goolub and Sara Feldman, a Jewish woman who nevertheless managed to become Migration Policy Advisor to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, a fact that sheds some light on how that organization became rabidly pro-migrant.
Another organization providing legal support for the pro-immigration
lobby is the Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Right’s Under the Law. Of its six most senior staff, three are Jewish (Jon M. Greenbaum, Lisa Bornstein, and Samuel Weiss). One of its most senior lawyers is Ezra Rosenberg, a veteran in the multicultural cause who has worked variously to challenge racial profiling by police, to stop requests
for voter ID among certain ethnic groups in Texas, and to advance school desegregation in North Carolina. A further interesting
organization is the Northwest Immigrants Rights Project, where two members of the board of 12 can be verified as Jewish (Dave Heiner and Sara Litt), a representation of 16%, and
staff attorneys include Jews Elizabeth Eisenberg, Jenna Golan-Streib, Rachel Rubinstein, and Jordan Wasserman. At the Asylum Advocacy Project, two of the five members of the advisory board are Jewish (Dani Isaacsohn and the above mentioned Michael Wishnie), and its
list of donors appears to be at least 40% Jewish.
The Director of Refugee Council USA
is Naomi Steinberg. The Executive Director of the New York Civil Liberties Union is the Jewish feminist Donna Lieberman who includes among her ongoing activities “resisting the Trump regime’s attack on immigrant children and refugees,”
while its Legal Director is Arthur Eisenberg. The American Immigration Council is under the Jewish Directorship of Beth Werlin, its Research Director is the Argentinian Jew Guillermo Cantor (see a great example of his propaganda here), and its Policy and Media Director is Royce Bernstein Murray. The area director for Refugee Services of Texas in Austin is the Jewish Erica Schmidt-Portnoy. Schmidt-Portnoy has described
the recent 80% decline in the number of refugees being resettled in Texas as “hard to watch.” Meanwhile, another Portnoy, Diane Portnoy, Jewish founder and CEO of The Immigrant Learning Center, has demanded that Massachusetts should welcome more Syrian refugees. A similar organization is the Open Avenues Foundation, which has the stated goal of “helping foreign nationals build their unique path to thrive in the United States.”
The founder and executive director of Open Avenues is Danielle Goldman, also Jewish.
Jewish lawyers, occasionally acting alone or as part
of small firms, are also disproportionately represented as major immigrant and asylum advocates. One good example in this
regard is Susan J. Cohen, founder and Chair of Mintz Law’s Immigration Practice. Cohen was involved in contributing to the US Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS) regulations implementing the Immigration Act of 1990, and has won awards for her political
asylum work from the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts and the Political Asylum/Immigration Representation (PAIR)
Project (of which she is now President). PAIR “provides free immigration services to indigent asylum seekers and detained
immigrants.” In 2017, Cohen led a Mintz team that worked with the ACLU of Massachusetts and others to obtain a temporary
restraining order on President Trump’s travel ban.
Cohen also advised the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts in drafting the legislation which resulted in the Massachusetts Global Entrepreneur in Residence (GEIR)
program, which enables tens of thousands of non-White foreign students to stay in Massachusetts if they merely indicate they
might start a company. Cohen co-developed the project with another Jewish lawyer, Jeff Goldman. Goldman describes himself as “a leader in immigration policy” and “chairs Governor Charlie Baker’s
Advisory Council on Refugees and Immigrants.” Goldman and Cohen, like Carl Rubenstein at the Office of Refugee Resettlement,
are illustrative of a remarkable Jewish talent for acquiring key government positions in the areas of immigration and refugee
resettlement. Another useful example is Mark Greenberg, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute and a former senior administrator at Rubenstein’s Office of Refugee
Resettlement. Yet another very notable Jewish lawyer is Michael Kagan. Kagan led a campaign to ensure changes to refugee status determination (RSD) procedures by the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)
that would result in more migrants attaining official refugee status, thus improving their chances of getting asylum or
visas in the West. Kagan is co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas’ Boyd School
of Law, which offers free legal aid to all immigrants.
The record of Jews as immigration
judges is also quite remarkable. Detailed statistics for most senior immigration judges are available online. One example
is Judge Raisa Cohen, New York Immigration Court. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Cohen to begin hearing cases at the court in March
2016, but Cohen had previously decided on asylum cases as assistant chief counsel for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in New York. During the period 2013-2018, Cohen is recorded as deciding 572. Of these,
he granted 470 and denied 102. Converted to percentage terms, Cohen denied 17.8 percent and granted 82.2 percent. Compared
to Cohen’s denial rate of 17.8 percent, nationally during this same period, immigration court judges denied 57.6 percent
of asylum claims. Many asylum seekers in New York are provided with free legal aid by organizations like Central American Legal Assistance(CALA). CALA has a board of ten people, five of whom can be confirmed as Jewish (Lisa Reiner, Anne Isaak, Zachary Sanders,
Harry Shulman, and Ellen Wachtel).
Another example, Judge Leonard Shapiro of Boston, is equally illustrative. Shapiro was appointed as an Immigration Judge in December 1990, and was coauthor of
the 1988 Edition of The American Immigration Lawyers Association Textbook and the 1995 Edition of The Immigration
Judge Benchbook. Shapiro was also the chairman of the Immigration Law Section of the Massachusetts Bar Association
in 1990 prior to his appointment. During the period 2013-2018, Shapiro is recorded as deciding 160 asylum claims. Of these,
he granted 113 and denied 47. Converted to percentage terms, Shapiro denied 29.4 percent and granted 70.6 percent. Again,
nationally during this same period, immigration court judges denied 57.6 percent of asylum claims.
Jews feature prominently among the
top immigration lawyers in Canada. In Nova Scotia, Lee Cohen “has become a leading light in immigration and human rights law” since “his representation of 174 Sikhs
who landed in Shelburne in the summer of 1987.” Cohen now recalls: “Nobody was for immigration,” he says.
“Nobody wanted refugees. I felt I was one of the very few people struggling to open the eyes of our community to something
that needed to be talked about. We had the opportunity to bring people to Canada — people who would help build our
prosperity and our nation, but who also needed to be here. So I dedicated myself to refugee and immigration law.”
Cohen went on to found the Halifax Refugee Clinic, and has “served as a mentor to a new generation of immigration law
professionals, who are helping him push for changes in the system.” Halifax Magazine has described Cohen as “the face of immigration law in Nova Scotia.”
Montreal’s most prominent immigration lawyer is David Cohen. Cohen is the founder of CanadaVisa.com, and sits on the Leaders’ Roundtable on Immigration of the Conference Board
of Canada. He has appeared before a number of Canadian Government Parliamentary Committees on immigration issues, where
he “has been actively working with government authorities to educate stakeholders about the finer points of the Immigration
and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA).” This took the form of vocal opposition to the Conservative government’s proposed legislative changes, which would restrict migration. Meanwhile, one of
Toronto’s “Premiere” immigration lawyers is the Jewish Shelley Levine, who has represented thousands of refugees and asylum seekers in Canada’s immigration courts, and regularly prepares
appeals to the Refugee Appeal Division and attends before the Federal Court Trial Division where he argues Judicial Review
cases of negative immigration decisions.
The Canadian Bar Association (CBA)
introduced its Immigration Law Section Award of Excellence in 2009, and has since given the award seven times. Of these,
Jews have been recipients three times (2009 – David Matas, senior legal counsel of B’nai Brith Canada; 2011 –
Gary Segal; and 2015 – Lorne Waldman). Waldman, who often waxes lyrical about his Jewish background, has been described by Canadian Lawyer as among the 25 most influential lawyers in Canada, and as the most influential refugee and
immigration lawyer in the country. In 2013, the award was given to the founders of the Immigration Law Section of the CBA
– Mendel Green, Cecil Rotenberg, Barbara Jackman, Marshall Drukarsh, Charles Roach, Gary Segal, Carter Hoppe, Steve
Abrahams, and Donald Greenbaum. Clearly most, if not all, of these individuals are Jews. Jewish lawyers are also very well
represented on the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, including Edward E. Aronoff, Gregory Cohen, Jeffrey Kushner, Shereen Benzvy Miller – Deputy Chair of the organization, Jonathan Rozenstein, Jaclyn Wasserman, Claire Wittenberg, and Marie-Claude Yaacov.
Two of Canada’s most high-profile academic propagandists on
behalf of increased immigration are Hugh Segal, an alumnus of United Talmud Torah Academy, and Maureen Silcoff. Segal is a Distinguished Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto and Principal of Massey College.
He also served in the Canadian Senate as a Conservative from Ontario, which shows, if nothing else, that the term Conservative
is now all but meaningless. Silcoff is an immigration and refugee lawyer, a former member of the Immigration and Refugee
Board, and co-chair of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers litigation committee . In July 2018, Segal and Silcoff,
along with an East Asian named Chen, teamed up to write a piece for the National Post titled: “Canada’s future prosperity depends on opening — not closing — our borders: We need higher
Since Jews are estimated to be 1.2% of the
Canadian population, we are again seeing not just overrepresentations, but extraordinary overrepresentations of Jews in
the areas of immigration, refugee assistance, the promotion of multiculturalism.
In the UK, Jews have also been remarkably overrepresented in the development
of pro-immigration policy. In 2000, Tom Steinberg, a British Jew who doesn’t appear to have expertise in anything but has been extraordinarily successful in gaining
influence with British and American governments, penned a policy document for the Institute of Economic Affairs titled “Reforming British Migration Policy.” Among his arguments is the following:
The second advantageous
aspect of allowing economic migrants into the UK is the cultural assets they bring with them, whether they be cuisine,
music, science, literature, forms of social organisation or actual objects and resources. Britain has benefited an incalculable
amount from imported practices, from chicken tikka masala to democracy itself. The dangers presented by nations
which legislate to enforce cultural purity hardly need repeating. Britain is not about to go down such a path, but the lack
of open migration channels means an inevitable retardation of cultural assimilation, with potential social and economic
costs. The missed opportunities themselves are impossible to calculate, but we need only to note that the founder of Intel
was a Hungarian born migrant to the US, or that Picasso received inspiration from African masks, to see the varying and
potentially enormous opportunity costs that hindering cultural interaction could have. Had we had such strict migration
policies in the past as we do today we can be sure that Britain would be a less rich place than it is. Our primary religion,
much of our language, our beer and favourite foods all have strong foreign elements which could have been excluded
by our current migration policies. [emphasis added]
Throughout the document are multiple
references to speeches by Barbara Roche, Britain’s Minister of State for Asylum and Immigration, 1999-2001. Roche is also Jewish. In February 2016, a biography
of Tony Blair, Broken Vows: Tony Blair — The Tragedy of Power (serialized in the Daily Mail), described
Roche’s part in the deliberate encouragement of mass immigration into the UK during Blair’s time as Prime Minister.
The Daily Mail, in its serialization, commented: “The most incredible revelations concern Barbara Roche,
a little-known MP who was immigration minister between 1999 and 2001. During this period, she quietly adopted policies that
changed the face of the UK … She changed the rules to allow more work permits to be issued, especially to people who
would previously have been considered asylum seekers.” Stephen Boys Smith, who was then head of the Home Office’s
immigration directorate, added: “It was clear that Roche wanted more immigrants to come to Britain. She didn’t
see her job as controlling entry into Britain, but by looking at the wider picture in a “holistic way” she wanted
us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.”
Tom Steinberg and Barbara Roche
One of Britain’s foremost pro-migrant
activists prior to the Roche years was Steve Cohen, a Jewish human-rights lawyer in Manchester. Cohen founded the Immigration Aid Unit, and was “politically opposed
to immigration controls in their totality and took part in many anti-deportation and immigration campaigns both as a lawyer
and a campaigner.” He founded the ‘No One is Illegal’ Group in September 2003, and penned a number of
tracts with titles such as Imagine There’s No Countries and From the Jews to the Tamils: Britain’s
mistreatment of refugees. Cohen described himself as a socialist, but his “open borders” ideological is
mirrored well by Bryan Caplan, a Jewish American capitalist economist described by both The Atlantic and Vox as one of the world’s leading proponents of the open borders position. One of Caplan’s tracts is titled Why
Should We Restrict Immigration?, something that could easily have emerged from the Cohen canon. Apparently differing
widely in their economics, their shared ethnic origins emerge as the only significant connection. The UK’s Refugee Law Initiative, based at the University of London, was founded and is led by a Jew, Director David Cantor. Cantor previously worked at the Refugee Legal Centre, a London-based public law centre that provides free legal advice
and representation to asylum seekers.
None of the above takes into account the equally prolific presence of Jews in what might
be termed the “propagandistic” elements of the unfolding era of mass migration, or areas of activism in which
Jews act explicitly as Jews (e.g. HIAS). These subject will require separate treatment and will form a later addition
to what will undoubtedly become an extended series exploring the startling similarities in pro-migrant, pro-refugee Jewish
activism. The intention of this essay is merely to act as an introduction to the themes, and to some of the individuals and
groups involved, and to act as a corrective to the Cofnas default hypothesis, which ends all too abruptly and neatly with
the assertion that Jews are simply prone to overrepresentation. We may reply, having surveyed the scene, that there are
overrepresentations and then there are overrepresentations. There really is no comparison between Jewish involvement
in anti-immigration politics, and Jewish involvement in pro-immigration politics. In fact, the only place on earth where
one might find ample evidence of the former is Israel – a fact that damns the Cofnas hypothesis rather than supporting
To paraphrase Hamlet, we might say, when looking upon Israel, “Ay,
there’s the rub!” Because if the Jewish interest in immigration and refugees is provoked, as we are so often
told, by the Jewish historical experience, then it would appear that Jews are only willing to indulge this warped self-pitying
nostalgia in lands other than their own. If the pro-refugee, pro-migrant craze is a Diaspora phenomenon, then the lands
of the Diaspora have a problem. The practical realities of this problem are such that anti-immigration politics lacking anti-Semitic
elements are doomed to failure. Jews are demonstrably providing the leadership, organisational capacity, money, and legal
aggression that is driving the mass migration machine. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. The names and groups here can
be checked and rechecked – they aren’t going to disappear, and the percentages won’t change.
It’s time to wake up. (Past time actually).
Detroit: The Death of White Civilisation
Anyone who doubts the long-term
effect of the swamping of the First World by the Third, need look no further than Detroit, where a new report has revealed
that almost half of all adults in the city are “functionally illiterate” and essentially unable to operate in
The report, issued by the “Detroit Regional Workforce Fund” (a government-private sector partnership
organisation set up by race-blind liberals), said that the “National Institute for Literacy estimates that 47% of
adults in Detroit are functionally illiterate, referring to the inability of an individual to use reading, speaking, writing,
and computational skills in everyday life situations.
“Generally, those adults who score at Level 1 (on a scale of 1 to 5, lowest
to highest) have difficulty performing such everyday tasks as locating an intersection on a street map, reading and comprehending
a short newspaper article, or calculating total costs on an order form,” it continued.
The report admitted that the shocking illiteracy
levels could not be explained solely by a lack of high school education.
“We also know that of the 200,000 adults who are functionally illiterate,
approximately half have a high school diploma or GED, so this issue cannot be solely addressed by a focus on adult high-school
completion,” the baffled liberals said.
In addition, the report said, these figures are “aggregates and communicate
a city-wide issue. We also know some neighborhoods and census tracts within the city have more significant concentrations
of adults who are functionally illiterate and/or lack educational credentials.”
The report ignores the obvious: Detroit
is now a “black” city, and has been utterly destroyed after the whites were driven out by a combination of horrendous
black crime levels, collapsing standards and an inefficient bureaucracy. In a nutshell, whites have found it impossible
to live in an area where there is no longer any semblance of functioning modern white western society.
* Detroit’s violent crime rate is one of the highest in the
United States. The official crime rate is 62.18 per 1000 residents for property crimes, and 16.73 per 1000 for violent crimes
(compared to national figures of 32 per 1000 for property crimes and 5 per 1000 for violent crime). Official records also
show that up to 70 percent of homicides are drug related.
* Black crime has run every last major grocery store out of Detroit.
Massive shoplifting, stock theft and inoperable Third World conditions saw the last major store, Farmer Jack, leave in 2007.
Since then, Detroit, one of America’s largest cities, hasn’t had a single grocery chain store within the city
Vast areas of the city are utterly smashed and lie in ruins, making this once-thriving home of the American automobile industry,
into a wasteland which resembles a war zone.
reason for all of this?
According to the US Census Bureau’s 2010 census, 1.23% of Detroit’s population is Asian, 81.84% is black,
10.42% is white, and 6.51% is “other.” Interestingly, the “Hispanic” population, which could be of
any race, is counted as 6.56%, whatever that might mean.
The racial sea change in Detroit provides the key to understanding
the collapse in that city.
In 1930, 92.3% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1940, 90.8% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1950, 83.63% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1960, 70.8% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1970, 56.0% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1980, 35.7% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 1990, 22.2% of Detroit’s population was white.
In 2000, 12.3% of Detroit’s population was white.
And in 2010, the white population had dropped to around 10%, although
this figure will also no doubt include “Hispanics” and Middle Easterners.
The destruction of the once-great city
of Detroit into a Third World hell-hole is one of the most obvious glimpses into western civilisation’s future if
current racial demographic trends continue.
Only the willingly blind will not see.
Migrant Invasion - The Illuminati Plan for White Genocide
March 1, 2016
A 1912 book exposes Illuminati Jewish war against white race.
The migrant invasion of Europe and the US can be traced to a long-term Illuminati Jewish program to destroy the white race.
Anti-Communist Jew, Myron Fagan reveals this program, and Dan (comment below) shows that George Soros is financing this racist assault.
focuses on the US but its pertinence to Europe
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
(from June 13, 2013)
Wikipedia will tell you that the book
"A Racial Program for the 20th Century" (1912)
is another anti-Semitic hoax. It says the book and author Israel Cohen didn't exist.
The reason for this lie? This book contains a famous passage that reveals the Illuminati-Communist race strategy,
later applied to women and other minorities in the guise of "feminism" and "diversity":
"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness
of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist
Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instil in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the
Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of
sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which
will deliver America to our cause."
Rep. Thomas Abernathy
read this passage into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103, p. 8559, top of page.) Wikipedia tells you Abernathy
read the quotation in a letter to the Editor of the Washington Star, and the newspaper subsequently determined it was a hoax and apologized. "The quotation has retained some
popularity among racists and anti-Semites to this day," Wikipedia chortles.
I have subsequently added this line
to the Wiki entry: "However, the author fits the description of Israel Cohen (1879-1961) a prolific Zionist author
who wrote the Foreword to Israel Zangwill's "The Schnorrers" as well as 30 other books. Like many purported "hoaxes," the quotation does describe events as they subsequently
unfolded and the operations of the US Communist Party." This information was immediately removed by Ziopedia.
Cohen was the General Secretary of the World Zionist Organization. If this is the same Cohen,
it means Zionism and Communism were identical.
"International" Jews, like other globalists, serve the Rothschilds' sick
megalomaniac program of world government dictatorship. "National" Jews, like other patriots, owe their first loyalty
to their country and fellow citizens. Like Benjamin Freedman, Myron Fagan (1887-1972) fought the bankers' Communist agenda for the best part of his life.
Myron Fagan, a successful Broadway playwright and director, met Israel Cohen, Israel Zangwill
and George Bernard Shaw at a party to celebrate the opening of Zangwill's play The
Melting Pot in 1910. He knew the three men to be founders of the Fabian Society. Cohen
told Fagan he was planning to write "A Racial Program for the 20th Century"
as a "humanitarian" follow up to "The
Melting Pot." At the time, Fagan didn't realize that the play, which described
how Jews and Blacks triumph against White prejudice, was pure propaganda, part of the Communist campaign of fostering "guilt"
in white Liberals described above.
It all fell into place in 1957 when
Fagan read the Washington Star quotation in the
context of the debate over school desegregation. In 1966, he recalled:
book was published in 1913 ... the NAACP and the ADL were created [by the bankers] almost simultaneously to carry out those
directives. That was more than a half-century ago. Can there be any doubt that that was intended to launch our present Negro
upheaval for a Black Revolution?
(left, Dylan Roof shot up a black church in Charleston SC in 2015)
"If that isn't enough evidence, in 1935, the Communist Party's 'Workers
Library Publishers' issued a pamphlet entitled 'THE NEGROES IN A SOVIET AMERICA.' It urged the Negroes to rise up, especially
in the South, and form a Soviet State in the South, and apply for admission into the Soviet Union ... it contained implicit
assurance that the 'revolt' would be supported by all American Reds, and on page 38 it promised that a Soviet government
would confer greater benefits on Negroes than on Whites and that 'Any act of discrimination or prejudice against a Negro
will become a crime under the Revolutionary law ...
" ... When Abernathy published that Israel Cohen
excerpt in the Congressional Record, we (Cinema Educational Guild, Inc.) promptly issued a 'News-Bulletin' in which we published
the entire story -- and warned of the coming Negro uprisings...
years went by and nobody even tried to deny the matter, but, suddenly, after two years, during which the ADL and similar
groups had ferreted out ALL copies of the book and destroyed them, they announced that the whole thing was a fraud, that
there never had been such a book, or an 'Israel Cohen' ... Why did they wait two years? And how could they deny the existence
of a writer named Israel Cohen in the face of all the books he had written? Copies of which I have. More important, bear
in mind that Israel Cohen had been a prime mover in all 'Fabian Socialist' and Communist movements in England -- also that
I had met him in person when he actually discussed the book at that banquet."
Click on this text to watch Why They want to REPLACE YOU...
and yet it is never mentioned by the mainstream
Click on this text to watch a commotion caused by Its OK To Be White Signs that Popped Up In a Fort Worth Neighborhood...
Police Called to Investigate “It’s Okay to be White” Signs
In Forth Worth, Texas
someone decided to post signs saying, “it’s okay to be White” around a neighborhood. This has prompted
calls for a police investigation and local news coverage.
They’re trying to claim that a completely innocuous sign saying that there’s nothing
wrong with being a White person is some type of racist and evil statement. The fact that there is so much hysteria over this,
proves yet again the anti-White bias and hatred that exists in the United States of America.
And comically if you watch the news report, the local politician
Cary Moon says that he’s against people posting literature that might offend people. Well that means you are against
the First Amendment and free speech you stupid fuck.
As far as I’m concerned, all anti-White hating bigots should be removed from the country. If they don’t
like the people who founded this nation, than they don’t deserve to be here.
THE PRIMARY JEWS BEHIND OPENING THE IMMIGRANT
- Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
- Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
Pfeffer (Former President of American Jewish Congress (AJC)
- Norman Podhoretz (Writer and
Member of The Council on Foreign Relations - former leftist, now a Jewish neo-con)
Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled
‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions
on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for
over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration
Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish
Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,”
(he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith,
(there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in
the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
The main author of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was Jewish assistant attorney
general Norbert A. Schlei (1929-2003). (Schlei also wrote the Voting Rights Act of 1965).
Jewish Arnold Aronson (1911-1998) was founder and leader
of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR). The LCCR, a powerful coalition of political and religious
groups, organized major, countrywide lobbying efforts to aid passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
and Javits were fanatical Zionists as well:
When it was unclear that President Harry Truman would support Zionism,
Cellar and a committee of Zionists told him that they had persuaded Dewey to support the Zionist policy and demanded that
Truman also take this stand. Cellar reportedly pounded on Truman‘s table and said that if Truman did not do so, “We’ll
run you out of town. When he and a colleague opposed a Zionist resolution in Congress, Emanuel Celler, a New York Democrat
who was to serve in Congress for almost 50 years, told them: “They ought to take you b…s out and shoot you.”
Jacob Javits, another well-known senator, this time Republican, told a Zionist women’s group: “We’ll fight
to death and make a Jewish State in Palestine if it’s the last thing that we do.” From:
Alison Weir on the Early Days of the Israel Lobby
Double standards from the start...!
The Jewish Conspiracy Behind The 1965 Open Immigration
THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY BEHIND THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW
THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.
While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law
Of 1965 was the beginning of America’s death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and
“bribing” the law into existence with the fanaticism equalling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American
Christian culture in their aggressive efforts to change it. The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that
Jews are a paranoid
people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews have a guilt complex - and for good reason.) Jews fear a homogenous
Christian culture of which they would never ascend to influential positions. Rather, in a homogenous Christian culture, Jews
are looked upon, (and rightly so), as “Christ-killers.” This is why the Jews tried to get Mel Gibson’s
movie, The Passion of Jesus Christ, removed from the silver screen.
A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen
in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:
—— “Jewish survival can only take place within the framework
of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to
the concept of cultural pluralism.” ——
Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress
(Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)
* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings
on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration
levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced
similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate,
“Christ-Hater”), wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still
a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith,
(there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in
the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN
IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S.
Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of
America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these
immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling
Christianity. Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants are encouraged
by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
The Jews have also given these immigrants
a moral mandate to expand both demographically and politically. And expand they will and do! But any attempts by
European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control in America are represented by the Jews as
being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’
THE JEWS ARE GUILTY of the ruination of America. What can we do to stop
them even now before the final sliciing of their knives into the effecting of the circumcision of our nation? Start
by stopping ALL immigration NOW...!
THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY BEHIND THE
1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW
THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965
with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.
While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America’s death as a unified
nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and “bribing” the law into existence with the fanaticism
equalling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
continually evinced hostility toward American Christian culture in their aggressive efforts to change it. The Open Immigration
Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility.
a paranoid people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews have a guilt complex - and for good reason.) Jews
fear a homogenous Christian culture of which they would never ascend to influential positions. Rather, in a homogenous Christian
culture, Jews are looked upon, (and rightly so), as “Christ-killers.” This is why the Jews tried to get Mel
Gibson’s movie, The Passion of Jesus Christ, removed from the silver screen.
A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948
quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the American Jewish Congress:
—— “Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding
democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.”
Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open
Immigraton Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council
of Foreign Relations)
* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent
role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’
that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over
40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration
Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treatises and books
that propagandized for open immigration.
* Norman Podhoretz,
a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open
* Jewish organizations such as the American
Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, (there is no end to their organizations),
filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing
of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY
fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050,
European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants
since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these immigrants
come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Christianity.
Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews
to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate to expand both demographically and politically. And expand they will
and do! But any attempts by European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control in America are
represented by the Jews as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’
THE JEWS ARE GUILTY of the ruination of America. What can we do to
stop them even now before the final sliciing of their knives into the effecting of the circumcision of our nation?
The only answer is for each and every American to pray for the re-emergence
of a Christian America. There is no in between. We must make the best of a bad situation. Let us then all make a commitment
to Jesus Christ and regular Church attendance.
and only then can we be 'more than conquerors through Him who loves us.' And who will we the conquerors vanquish? The enemies
of our Lord, the Jews!" ...Brother Nathanael (Street Evangelist)
European Americans still compose 63% of
the population of the USA. Anyone watching television in America now days will get the mistaken idea that African Americans
compose nearly half of the population of the USA judging by their prominence on the TV screen. African Americans compose only
13% of the population of the USA. Hispanics compose 18% but are absolutely under-represented on television. Asians compose
3% of the population of the USA but are more prominant on television than Hispanics. The JEWS who own and control television
are deliberately engineering these misconceptions and have been engineering non-European immigration since the HART-CELLAR
Immigration Act of 1965.
California goes, so eventually goes the USA: California is now 39.7% White and dropping - Hispanic 37.4 and rising -
Black 6% - Asian 13.3% - Other 3.6%
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (H.R. 2580; Pub.L. 89–236, 79 Stat. 911, enacted June 30, 1968),
also known as the Hart–Celler Act, changed the way quotas were allocated by ending the National Origins Formula that
had been in place in the United States since the Emergency Quota Act of 1921. Representative Emanuel Celler of New York proposed
the bill, Senator Philip Hart of Michigan co-sponsored it, and Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts helped to promote it.
The Hart–Celler Act abolished the quota system based on national origins that had been American immigration
policy since the 1920s. The 1965 Act marked a change from past U.S. policy which had discriminated against non-northern
The JEWS know
full well that a homogeneous country is very difficult to undermine.
Miscegenation cannot be commanded, but it can be promoted. Depriving Whites
of the possibility to be among themselves in terms of residence, study, work and recreation is one thing. Suggesting
miscegenation in films, TV series and commercials is another thing. There is nowadays hardly any form of media
that is not full of this race mixing propaganda, mostly in subliminal form, 'thanks' to the Jews who control the
The United Sates became the prime target for mongrelization
after the virtual destruction of Germany in World War II by weakening and undermining its power. It is the unswerving goal
of world Jewry to mongrelize America, and all White counties, and phase out the magnificent White Race from the face of
this planet. Very few are aware that all their civil rights gibberish is just a smoke screen hiding the real Jewish objective.
Mongrelization is their real objective, lets make no mistake about it. The Jew-ridden United States of America is veritably
Jew-heaven, the new JerUSAlem, and the White gentiles are being looted and ravaged by their Jewish masters at will.
The United States is under especially heavy attack by the Jews because it is the last and most significant
power base of the White Race. This is why the Jewish drive for integration in the States is at its most ferocious peak of
intensity. Here, the Jew realizes, he must break the back of White resistance to his programme of mongrelization. He knows
full well that it is in the United States that his whole precarious conspiracy might well blow up in his face if he does
not. The Tribe of Judah also knows that it is in the United States that the movement could spawn that would come to the rescue
of the White Race in the rest of the world. For this reason the black is breeding most rapidly in this welfare state, and
why the Mexican half-caste Indians are invading and breeding by the millions without resistance, and why the United States
has now become the open magnet of all the scum races of the world.
Even more devastating result are achieved in the U.S. homeland itself
by the Jewish propaganda, promoting mixed marriages. The Jew is bending the White Man`s thinking towards accepting, condoning
and entering into mixed marriages by cheer force of massive, overwhelming propaganda. The Jewish controlled Supreme court
have completely destroyed the laws prohibiting inter-racial marriages. Unless the White Race wants to become another stupid,
incapable dark race within the next two generations at most, it must soon change its attitude and its course of action.
By pumping the black blood of Africa into the veins of White America, the fanatic Jews are reaching their unswerving goal
to poison the White Man`s genes. They are committing similar atrocities in all other White countries, whether they be England,
Sweden, France, Holland or whatever.
instinctive hatred between the races in any multi-racial society is permanent and irreconcilable. In this kind of society
the White Race is especially hated by the blacks and all the other dark races of the world. They feel inferior and threatened,
and both for good reason ! The superior is always envied and hated by the inferior. The weak hate the strong; the poor hate
the rich; the sick hate the healthy; the dumb hate the intelligent; the ugly hate the beautiful, and the dark races hate
the White. We must always see to it that the superior survives and the inferior is sacrificed, when forced to make a choice
between the two. The Jewish objective is to get the White Race to accept the blacks as our equal, get us to inter-marry.
Wouldn`t it be better to bring the apes up to the level of the blacks and have them interbreed ? If we are going to start
inter-breeding and “uplifting”, why not start at the lowest rung of the ladder where the “need”
is greatest ?
take a look at what the Jew wants the White Race to interbreed with. In the last 6000 years the African black has invented
nothing. The black have never been known to build a dam. The average African black I.Q. is about 40 points lower than
the average White, putting his average well below the moron class. The average American black is somewhere around 80, a
good 20 points below the average White, and this is because they have assimilated a large quantity of White blood and are
actually mulattoes. Therefore the American black is on the borderline of the moron classification, with a large percentage
being actually in the moron category. Feel like inter-breeding ?
We must propagate the fact that there is a far greater gap between the
intellect of our leading White geniuses and that of the black, than there is between the black and the next highest ape.
We must realize that the blacks` natural level of existence is more closely related to that of animals than it is to the
great and high civilization of the White Race. On this point, we disclaim any common racial denominator with the blacks,
the same as we do regarding monkeys. Like the horse, the dark races at certain times have served a temporary usefulness,
but unlike the horse, the dark races have mostly impeded and stymied the White Man`s progress. The black boasts about “Black
Culture” where none exists, and talk about “Black Pride” where there is very little to be proud of. Although
the black is the most useless component in the modern White Mam`s world, he is a very dangerous, festering, and rapidly
spreading cancer in our racial body. They are the means by which the Jews plan to destroy the White Race.
Busing Our Children
The Jews know that in order to get inter-racial marriages accepted, they
have to embark on a tyrannical power drive to mix black and White children at an early age. Being more impressionable and
more easily deceived, the young people are the prime target of the Jews. The smokescreen used by Jew-promoted blacks to
enforce this campaign is so-called “equal opportunities”. What this means is that education has to be downgraded
for the blacks to pass. The damage can be seen when comparing I.Q.`s of White children who got “equal opportunities”
and those who didn`t. Our lamentable White children have become victims of a heinous Jewish crime. Our total education programme
is in a shambles thanks to our alien government enforcing a programme of school busing and forced integration of the races.
The colleges took
the same road. The Jews have turned our colleges into centres for brain pollution rather than education and are being constantly
invaded by the Jewish idea of race mixing. The colleges` trouble has progressed along the same lines as the churches`. First
destroy the young men`s sense of respect for the ancient foundations, and then fill it with Jewish revolutionary social
doctrines. These two always go together and cannot live apart, and are the fulfillment of the Protocol`s programme to split
non-Jewish society by means of ideas.
is a simple solution. All that is necessary for the White student to know is that the attacking force is Jewish. This the
Jewish programme cannot endure; “you must not use the term ‘Jew’, they say, “you must not identify
us”. The answer is to identify the source and nature of the influence. The White students` choice is between the Tribe
of Judah and the Anglo-Saxon. In making up their allegiance, let the White student decide whether they want to follow those
who seek to tear down, or the Builders. Calling our White students back to a pride of race is the only absolute antidote
to the Jewish influence. It is not a case for argument. If the White students decide on following this council of dark rebellion
and destruction, it is because they do not know whose sons they are, of what race they are the scions. Let there be free
intercourse of ideas and free speech in our colleges, but let Jewish thoughts be labelled Jewish, and let the White students
know the racial secret.
programme consists of opening wide the doors to the blacks although they are not wanted, and although the realtors, builders
and landlords know that the blacks will ruin their property values. The Zionist Occupied Government has cowed and coerced
these forces to do its bidding.
Through sheer treachery,
Zionist Occupied Governments in White countries, has aided the dark races to achieve in the 20th century what they could
not win in the 19th century by force of arms. By means of subsidization; by means of welfare; by means of immigration they
have allowed illegal dark race aliens to invade our White borders by the millions. These dark races have been deliberately
aided and imported into White states by the strong arm of the Zionist Occupied Governments itself and at the expense of,
and to the detriment of the White taxpayer. The Zionist Occupied Governments is encouraging this massive invasion, and is
taking an active hand in deliberately importing the riff-raff from all over the world. The inferior dark races of the world
are to be deployed according to the Jewish plan to act as shock troops to mongrelize the superior White Race, and exterminate
those that will not mongrelize. They are swarming in by the millions and are taking our land and living space. What is the
difference if they are doing so as a military army or as civilian invaders ?
The Jews are now deliberately shipping hordes of dark races into the
British Kingdom, injecting a foul pollution where no pollution ever existed. The same can be said of the United States.
In the last stronghold of the White Race, immigration became business, a strictly Jewish business. The Immigration Department
favoured White immigrants from Europe in previous years, because America was deemed to be a White country. In the last few
decades it has swung heavily the other way. Whites are now kept, out while the rest of the scum of the world is flocking
into the United States with the full sanction of the Jew-controlled Immigration Department ! They also promote programmes
to bring dark children into the United States to increase the mongrelization of the land. Through the misdirection of the
churches, many such orphans are adopted to affluent White homes, only to grow up and marry into White society. Madonna and
Angelina Jolie/Brad Pitt are examples.
Tammany- [Democratic Party in America] and Jewish Kehillah leaders have always been alertly aware of the fact that their
power depended upon an uninterrupted flow of immigration. The best material for the Jewish Kehillah`s purpose has always
been the foreigner, until America became so thoroughly un-Americanized as to make intensive immigration no longer essential.
In 1884 a great influx of immigration occurred into the United States, causing the degeneration of New York, and then of
American life. After the arrival of Russian, Austrian and Hungarian Jews, an memorable period of crime followed, the marks
of which remain to this day. These Eastern Jews were hailed as “German” and “British” scientists.
The laws of the country are set aside in open contempt by the Jewish immigrants. They are able to “arrange”
the passport work, they “arrange” avoidance of the health regulations. Their first glimpse of life in the States
shows a Jewish control as potent and complete as it is Russia; they can come from anywhere, and are coming from anywhere
moment, Jewish immigration set in strongly toward South America, principally Brazil. The Jews of Brazil found it necessary
to emigrate in the direction of the Dutch colony of what is now New York, because of military participation in a disagreement
between the Brazilians and the Dutch. Peter Stuyvesant, the Dutch governor, ordered them to leave because he did not entirely
approve of their settling among his people. The Jews had evidently taken the precaution to assure their being received if
not welcomed, because upon revoking the order of Stuyvesant, the Directors gave as one of the reasons for the Jews being
received, “the large amount of capital which they have invested in the shares of the company”.
Stuyvesant compelled the Jews to make New York the
principle port of America, and though a majority of New York Jews had fled to Philadelphia at the time of the American Revolution,
most of them returned at the earliest opportunity, instinct seeming to make them aware that, in New York was to be their
principle paradise of gain. And so it has proved until this day. It not only houses the greatest center of Jewish population
in the world, but the very land of the city is the holdings of the Jews. New York is the gateway where the bulk of American
imports and exports are taxed, and where practical all the business done in the United States pays tribute to the masters
it should not be strange that the smaller nations of Europe refers to America as “The Jews`Country”, with the
alarming increase in Jewish immigration bringing the question to public attention again. No wonder that Jewish writers, viewing
this unchecked growth in wealth and power, this unprecedented prosperity, exclaim with their usual arrogance that the United
States is the Promised Land foretold by the prophets, interest and profits are the “milk and honey”, and New
York is New Jerusalem ! They further describe the peaks of the Rockies as “the mountains of Zion”, and with reason,
if the coastal and mining wealth of the Jews is considered. It should be of interest to the student that Columbus` voyage
was associated with at least five Jews : Luis de Torres, interpreter; Marco, the surgeon; Bernal, the physician; Alonzo
de la Calle, and Gabriel Sanchez. De Torres was the first man ashore and also the first to discover the use of tobacco.
After settling in Cuba he became the father of Jewish control of the tobacco business as it exists today.
Click on his text to see how Israel Is Directly Helping Muslims And Africans Invade Europe...
A semi-clandestine group that helped over 15,000
non-European benefit bandits to illegally get into Europe has been caught on tape admitting to systematically training asylum
seekers to exploit screening interviews by faking trauma and persecution.
Ariel Ricker, the
executive director of America-based Advocates Abroad, a major non-profit NGO which provides legal aid to migrants, has been
caught on tape openly discussing how she teaches refugees to lie to border agents. The video was released by Canadian right-wing
activist, author and internet personality, Lauren Southern. It will be part of her new documentary film project ‘Borderless,’
which takes on the European migration crisis.
Abroad are funded by globalist corporations including the notorious Rockefeller Brothers Fund, which adds fuel to the flames
of those who claim that the crisis overwhelming Europe is Jewish controlled. Similar corrupt traffickers in human misery
are EU and UN funded.
On its website, Advocates Abroad claims to have helped as many as 15,000 migrants
cross the Greek border and 2,500 more outside of Greece. The organization is massive, taking volunteers from major universities,
and was even featured in a documentary film by the International Bar Association.
In the footage,
Ricker describes how the organization provides training sessions for migrants seeking entry into Europe, in which they are
taught how to act during interviews with border agents: “I tell them this is acting, all of this is acting…
for them to get through, they must act their part in the theatre.”
George Soros (Investor, Finanzier, Open Society Foundation)
She also calls EASO (European Asylum Support Office) personnel tasked with screening the migrants “f***ing
stupid.” She goes on to describe a formula that the organization has created to exploit them in screening
One method she teaches migrants is to exploit the presumed Christian
sympathies of the predominantly Eastern Orthodox Greece by pretending to have been persecuted for being Christian. She even
describes telling them how to pray during interviews, ironically because doing so reflects “honesty.”
The organization, which was founded in 2016, helped to shuffle
migrants into a cash-strapped Greece, which was struggling to recover from its long-term government-debt crisis. The majority
of migrants seeking entry into Europe first come through Greece, with arrivals peaking in 2015.
Ironically, some of the real victims of the NGO’s
tactics are refugees as genuine refugees were forced to compete with fake candidates trained to trick the system. Ricker’s drama
coaching even instructed its pupils to feign the emotions of trauma survivors, seemingly without a thought for
those seeking asylum who don’t need to pretend to be suffering from trauma.
In the past few years, Greece’s migrant camps have become dangerously overcrowded,
resulting in violence and disease which the UN described as having reached “boiling point.”
But Advocates Abroad isn’t responsible for maintaining the refugee camps; their only job is getting people through the
Southern claims that the
UNHCR has already responded to the tapes by saying that they are “alarmed by these reports,” and the
backlash on social media has been understandably strong.
Click on this text to see Who's behind the race mixing agenda in advertising...
Click on this text to watch EUROPA - The Last Battle - Part 5 [Final cut]...
Click on this text to watch America Is Not a Nation of Immigrants
Click on this text to watch The Endgame - Full White Genocide Documentary...
When a state
is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population will hold the Stage
together and maintain it's existence through astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration.
But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population
is not homogeneous, where there is no bond of common blood but only that of one ruling hand.
will happen one day when hordes of emancipated slaves come forth from these dens of misery to swoop down on their unsuspecting
For this other world
does not think about such a possibility. They have allowed these things to go on without caring and even without suspecting
- in their total lack of instinctive understanding - that
sooner or later destiny will take it's vengeance unless it will have been appeased in time."
Click on this text to watch America is NOT a Nation of Immigrants or a Melting Pot | The Truth About Immigration into America...
Jewish Promotion of Non-White Immigration into White Countries
And the Walls Came
Tumbling Down: How the Jews Opened America’s Borders
Seekers Sent to Sweden in Previous Weeks
Demand Open Borders for USA, But Use DNA to Keep Israel Racially Pure
Unite Behind Push for Immigration Reform
Groups Praise Immigration Reform Proposals
Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography
Klein: Immigration Will Save the U.S. from White Racism
Jewish Promotion of Non-White Immigration
into White Countries
And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: How the Jews Opened America’s Borders
Seekers Sent to Sweden in Previous Weeks
Demand Open Borders for USA, But Use DNA to Keep Israel Racially Pure
Unite Behind Push for Immigration Reform
Groups Praise Immigration Reform Proposals
Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography
Klein: Immigration Will Save the U.S. from White Racism
plan – The genocide of the Peoples of Europe
Mass immigration is a phenomenon the causes of which are cleverly
concealed by the political elites, and the multicultural propaganda is employed to falsely portray it as inevitable. In
this article we intend to prove once and for all, that mass immigration is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What the
elites try to present as an inevitability of modern life, is actually the product of a plan conceived around
a table and prepared over decades, to completely change the face of our continent.
Few people know that one of the main instigators
of the process of European integration, was a man who also conceived the genocide of the peoples of Europe. He
was a sinister individual whose existence is unknown to the masses of our people, but the political elites consider him
as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard von Coudenhove Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named
Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis), and his mother the Japanese
Thanks to his close contacts with European aristocrats
and politicians, and due to the network of relationships created his nobleman-diplomat father, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi
was able to work unseen, away from the glare of publicity, and he managed to engage the co-operation of the most influential
heads of state for his plan, making them supporters and collaborators for his “project of European integration”.
In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed
to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be just
the first step in creating a world government. His earliest supporters included Czech politicians Tomáš
Masaryk and Edvard Beneš, and the German Jewish banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian
Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took early responsibility for leading the “Pan-European”
movement and later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi etc., offered their
With the rise of Fascism in Europe during the 1930s, the project
of European integration was abandoned and the “Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve. However, after
the Second World War, and thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish
Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, Kalergi managed to gain acceptance
for his plan by the United States Government and later the CIA became involved in driving the plan towards
The essence of the Kalergi plan
In his book «Praktischer Idealismus», Kalergi explains that the citizens of the future “United
States of Europe” will not be the people of the Old Continent, but a new mixed breed, the products of thorough
and widespread miscegenation. He states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and other non-White
races, to create a multiracial population, with not clear sense of tradition or identity and therefore easily controlled
by the ruling elite.
Kalergi proclaims the need to abolish the right of nations
to self-determination and outlines the break-up of nation states through the use of ethnic separatist
movements and the destruction of the nations themselves through mass migration. In order for Europe to be easily controlled
by the future elite, Kalergi proposes the creation of a homogeneous mixed breed population, and as to
who should be the new elite? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this point:
man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of
space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will
replace the current diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe,
against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this
artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the
spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened
when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French
Although no textbook mentions Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles of the
European Union. The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity,
to break down traditional ways of living and create a single mixed race, is the reason for community policies that promote
minority interests. The underlying motives are not really humanitarian, but because the power behind the ruthless
regime dominating the EU plans the greatest genocide in history.
prize is awarded every two years by the Coudenhove-Kalergi Foundation to Europeans who have excelled in promoting
this criminal plan. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.
The facilitation of genocide, is also the basis of the constant appeals from the United Nations,
demanding that we accept millions of immigrants to help counter the low birth rate among Europeans. According
to a report published in January 2000 by the population division of the United Nations in New York, under the title
“Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and aging population,” Europe will need to accept 159,000,000
migrants by 2025.
the citing of such precise numbers is
evidence of a premeditated plan. Clearly a low birth-rate can easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support
families and it is equally clear that the introduction of alien genes will do nothing to preserve our genetic
heritage but destroy it. The consequence of current policies promoting multiracialism is to create a weakened disparate population
without national, historical or cultural cohesion. In short, the policies of the Kalergi plan have been and
still are, the basis of official government policies intent upon the genocide of the Peoples of Europe, through
G. Brock Chisholm, a former director of the World Health
Organization (OMS), demonstrated this well when he said: “What people everywhere need to do is to limit births and
promote mixed marriages (between the different races), the outcome will be the creation of a single race throughout
the world which can be directed by a central authority. “
If we look around us, the implementation of the Kalergi Plan seems to be at an
advanced stage. We face Europe’s fusion with the Third World. The plague of interracial marriage produces each year
thousands of young people of mixed race: ‘The children of Kalergi’. Under the dual pressures of misinformation
and humanitarian stupefaction, promoted by the mass media, we Europeans are being taught to renounce our
origins, and to renounce our national identity.
The servants of globalization are trying
to convince us that to deny our identity, is a progressive and humanitarian act, that “racism” is wrong, because
they want us all to be blind consumers. It is necessary, now more than ever, to counter the lies of the System, to awaken
the revolutionary spirit among Europeans. Every one must be made aware of this truth, that European integration
amounts to genocide. We have no other option, the alternative is national suicide.
Translator’s note: Although the reasons due to which Kalergi made the choices he made are of no particular
interest to us, we will try to answer a question that will surely our readers have already asked: Why a European aristocrat
with Flemish, Polish, Greek-Byzantine roots and even with some samurai blood in his veins (from his mother) was such body
plans and organ in the hands of dark forces? The reasons, in our opinion, are multiple, idiosyncratic, psychological and
We therefore observe a personality with strong snobbish
attitudes, arrogance, and, allow me the term, “degenerate elitism.” Also, the fact that his mother was Asian,
perhaps created internal conflicts and frustrations, something that can happen to people with such temperament. But the
most decisive factor must have been the “proper teenager”, which incidentally of course, was beside him, and
became his first woman (at age 13): The Jewess Ida Roland, who would later become a famous actress.
The award of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize
to President Van Rompuy
On November 16th 2012, the President of the European Council,
Herman Van Rompuy, was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, during a special conference in Vienna, to celebrate 90 years
of pan-European movement. The prize is awarded every two years to leading personalities for their outstanding contribution
to the process of European integration.
A decisive factor that helped him win
the prize was the balanced way in which President Van Rompuy executed his duties in the new position of President of the
European Council, which was established by the Treaty of Lisbon. He handled this particularly sensitive leading and coordinating
role with a spirit of determination and reconciliation, while emphasis was also given to his skilful arbitration on European
affairs and unfailing commitment to European moral values.
speech, Mr Van Rompuy described the unification of Europe as a peace project. This idea, which was also the objective of
the work of Coudenhove-Kalergi, after 90 years is still important. The award bears the name of Count Richard Nicolaus von
Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), philosopher, diplomat, publisher and founder of the Pan-European Movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi
was the pioneer of European integration and popularized the idea of a federal Europe with his work.
Among the winners of the award, the Federal Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and the President of Latvia
Vaira Vike-Freiberga (2006), are included.
This article is a translation of an Italian
article, originally posted on Identità.
DOCUMENTED PROOF By: Dr. Edward R. Fields circa
1970 Source: https://katana17.wordpress.com/2015/05/21/jews-behind-race-mixing/ Contents Jew
Civil Rights Bill Author — Jacob Javits Jews Behind Race-Mixing in America The Answers Are Complex
Here Are the Facts From Their Own Mouths — The Jews Reveal Their Plans Jews Raise
Money for Blacks ...
BEHIND RACE-MIXING IN AMERICA The purpose of this article is to prove, through document ed evidence that Jews
in America are the prime movers and
proof: Jews behind race mixing [Edward R Fields] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Edward Reed - Jews behind race mixing.pdf - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online
for free. Jewry
each Jewish Community in every city of any size in America the Jews operate numerous organizations.
They are designed to guide and control the lives of every Jew.
behind Race Mixing Holocaust of America ... Is race-mixing wanted by the elites
and the media? ... Who is Behind the Hollywood Race Mixing Agenda?
suggests a sinister and subliminal purpose behind the race mixing trend.
... Why Are Jews Primarily Behind The Push For Forced-Multiculturalism In The ...
strives to portray the folly behind that favorite motto of the jews, Liberte, Fraternity,
Egalite, while at the same time exposing the devils for what they truly are.
Why does the Alt-Right claim that the Jewish people
are behind race-mixing and homosexuality?
Mixing And Inter-racial Marriages – The Jews Hoax On The White Race
When we look at how past White civilizations were destroyed by the Jewish conspiracy, we can clearly see
what their central aim and objective was, and still is today.
White Genocide: The Dystopian Nightmare To Come
The Ethnic European
The nightmare world awaiting our children in the year 2050 will be a world of unimaginable terror for
anyone with a white skin.
Edited and abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
notes and comments
IS THIS THE FUTURE?
who make up 95% of Europe, the smallest continent, are baffled by the sinister anti-White propaganda displayed in commercial
advertising. Propaganda promoting mixed-race relationships, particularly white women with black men, has become so general
that even the least observant have begun to take notice.
Based on small glimpses of marketing
sub-culture, one might assume half or more of all relationships involve some sort of race-mixing. The combination of white
women with black men is the most common mixed-race couple depicted in race-hate advertising.
If race diversity advertising was truly
about appealing to the greatest number of customers, it seems an odd strategy to focus so much on one combination, while
ignoring so many others. This suggests a sinister and subliminal purpose: to promote race mixing and make it seem trendy.
(All phrases in italics have been added to the text by Lasha Darkmoon. — Ed)
THE MIXED RACE IDEAL IS A LIE
that ethnic-Europeans are the least likely to marry outside of their race. Mixed race relationships are provably flawed.
In terms of combined average incomes of interracial marriages, black husbands with white wives earned the lowest amount
of any other combination. The black husband and white wife combination were also the least educated.
Of the interracial combinations, marriages
between whites and blacks were found to be the least stable and the most likely to result in divorce. A study of over
two million online dating interactions revealed distinct racial preferences between groups. White women are strongly against
race-mixing; they respond most frequently to white men and least frequently to black men. In light of this data,
it is all the more bizarre that the combination of a white woman with a black man is seen so frequently in advertising.
Why are the
advertisers engaging in this mischievous social engineering? Who are they exactly? And who is financing them?
HAS PROVED TO BE A CATACLYSMIC FAILURE
Sexually transmitted disease rates per the 2016 Centre for Disease Control speak for
themselves. A 2015 study examined the outcomes of women that have children with black men. The results were staggering.
Currently, 70% of black children are born out of wedlock; however, when the mother is white and the father black, the rate
jumps to 97%.
98% of white mothers studied reported that the father does not support their children financially, 97% report the
father is not in the child’s life, and 97% of the women have used welfare to help support themselves and their children.
Only 10% of women that have children with black men out of wedlock end up marrying them. The vast majority of white women
that have children with black men live far below the poverty line.
In a 2013 study of intimate partner violence in relationships, which
surveyed nearly 10,000 people, the authors concluded that interracial couples experienced higher levels of violence compared
to same race relationships.
IDENTIFYING WHITE SUCKERS
Idealistic youth lacks discernment.
LD: The younger the people questioned, the more likely they are to
parrot the politically correct party line that interracial relationships and interbreeding are good things. Young college
graduates, exposed to constant indoctrination at their universities, are also more likely to support this fashionable hogwash.
A good rule of thumb is this: if you wish to know what the truth is on any given subject, ask the average person under thirty
— and then believe the opposite! Experience has taught me that the most moronic and easily brainwashed Whites will
be found among young women in their twenties — like the pretty girl in this picture. [LD]
noted researcher says that after a considerable amount of spent time in academia he concludes that the longer one spends
in academia, the more apt one is to be indoctrinated by critical theory.
LD: By “critical theory” is meant, basically, the
communist doctrines of Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School, a movement widely known to be predominantly Jewish and
based on the teachings of Marx and Freud: promoting atheistic nihilism, hatred of Christianity and traditional moral values,
and the promotion of abortion, radical feminism, race mixing, homosexuality, pornography, and, ultimately, the normalisation of sexual degeneracy and deviance.
(For more on this subject,
see Satan’s Secret Agents: The Frankfurt School and their Evil Agenda and The Architects of Evil).
Pew Research 2010 found that 69% of people surveyed said that single women having children is a bad thing, 43% say
unmarried couples raising children is a bad thing, yet hypocritically only 14% say interracial marriage is a bad thing.
There is something particularly dumb about being in favour of interracial relationships, while at the same time conceding
the self-destructive outcomes of those relationships.
Research reveals that whites are the least likely to marry outside of their race.
When white women marry outside of their race, they are more likely to be abused, to become single-mothers, and live in poverty.
Whites dating outside of their race exposes them (and all of us) to a higher chance of contracting a sexually transmitted
know that despite fashionable acceptance, white people continue to show a natural disgust response to interracial relationships.
We also know that despite the tsunami of diversity propaganda in films, television, and in advertisements, same-race couples
are still the most common relationships, by far.
MALICE BEHIND RACE-MIXING PROPAGANDA
Few believe that interracial advertising
under the guise of “diversity” is about selling clothes or laundry detergent or cereal. The real purpose of
mixed race advertising is to present a distorted worldview: to humiliate and mock whites and make them feel guilty of
the crimes of colonialism.
White men are the last vanguard against the intrigues of an ethnic group who historically hate
Europeans. White women are displayed with non-white men not to sell items but as a tactic of psychological warfare against
European culture and civilisation. White men are rarely portrayed in a favourable light; they are often shown as overweight,
goofy, clumsy half-wits who rely on women or non-whites to make them look passably human.
Studies suggest the average American
is exposed to as many as 5,000 advertisements in a day. The power of advertising has the power to condition us to be more
accepting of social change. The prevalence of mixed-race couples and an increase of LGBT representation have in no small
way changed social attitudes. Although intuitive reactions of disgust remain, outward social attitudes have become accepting
of all forms of degeneracy and social decay.
TURNING BLACKS AGAINST WHITES
These images have an effect on black men as well. Blacks are constantly
being told by the film industry, TV, and advertising, that dating white women is natural and are falsely led to believe that
white women prefer black men to white partners. Faced by reality, the distaste towards blacks by white women causes resentment
which leads to rape, violence and the racist humiliation of white women.
Nearly 100% of interracial rapes are white women being raped by non-white
men (National Crime Victimization Survey, 2008, Table 42). These advertising images, which have no small part
in warping mentality, not only promote a dysgenic society, they place Whites in a grave danger.
THE SINISTER HAND BEHIND WHITE GENOCIDE
The most belligerent example of anti-white propaganda came from Netflix
via a set of three commercials for the company. The series of the three Netflix commercials is titled “The Couple”, which
features a white woman and a black man.
The Netflix commercial “Open Relationship” depicts two couples, an interracial
couple, and a white couple. The white man is depicted as small, weak, insecure, “non-progressive” and closed-minded.
His white girlfriend quickly decides to cast him aside to spend the evening with the interracial couple, as the black man
quite literally steals the man’s girlfriend in front of him, humiliating him.
HLG Studios out of Los Angeles was behind the production of these
three creepy commercials. The advertising company has worked on campaigns for a myriad of national brands, from fast food
chains to banks, technology companies, and clothing retailers. HLG Studios was founded by Yuri Baranovsky, the same carpetbagger
who directed Netflix’s race-mixing, anti-white propaganda pieces.
Yuri Baranovsky is Jewish, an ethnic group that is vehemently
opposed to Jews forming relationships outside their own ethnic group. Just four Jewish owned mega-corporations control the
vast majority of all advertising agencies. The Omnicom Group of New York, WPP of London, Publicis of Paris, and Interpublic
of New York are the key corporations in the West. (See picture)
The New York Times states that these companies are so powerful “they can indirectly set
network television schedules and starve magazines to death or help them to flourish,” by deciding how and when to
spend advertising dollars. Each company owns dozens if not hundreds of smaller agencies; Omnicom has bought over 150
Globalist CEO John Wren currently heads Omnicom Group. Omnicom was founded by Allen Rosenshine, Keith Reinhard,
and John Bernbach, all three are Jewish and promote the exclusivity of Jews — but work hard to destroy ethnic-European
Long-standing CEO of Publicis (1987–2017) has been Maurice Lévy, who cited his rabbi grandfather as
his greatest inspiration. Lévy has been honoured by the Anti-Defamation League, for his work fighting anti-Semitism,
and his relentless promotion of “diversity”.
WPP of London was founded and is currently run by Martin Sorrell, who
is a Jew. Chairman and CEO of the Interpublic Group (IPG), is Michael Isor Roth. Roth condemned the “white supremacist
ideology” at Charlottesville as he wrote in an internal creepy-weepy memo to 50,000 IPG employees.
There is clearly a disproportionate
number of Jews and those with Jewish sympathies involved in mass media advertising. From small start-up firms to multi-billion-dollar
corporations, all of which are promoting hostile anti-white falsehoods, while praising “diversity” and “inclusion.”
is carefully calculated ethnic-European genocide fuelled by Jewish hatred for Christian Europeans. These companies are not
merely promoting racial bastardisation and trying to appeal to a wider range of consumers, they are promoting the increased
abuse and sexual degradation of white women.
The race-destroyers purpose is to recreate a nation without ethnic-Europeans.
Race mixing propaganda says bluntly that white children are not wanted in the New Order and White men have no place in the
globalists’ nightmarish world.
ON WHITE GENOCIDE
Endnote by Lasha Darkmoon
are two types of genocide: hard genocide and soft genocide. We are all familiar with hard genocide. This
is an attempt to get rid of an entire ethnic group by violent means. By mass murder. The most notable example of a “hard
genocide” in history, according to politically correct Jewish sources, is the mass murder or “Holocaust”
of six million Jews in WWII by the Hitler regime.
“Soft genocide” is entirely different. This involves getting rid of an
entire race by slow and subtle means, whereby the victims of the genocide are either too stupid to notice their own gradual
demise, like sheep being led to the slaughterhouse, or by making the victim population too impotent and comatose to do anything
to stop their own bit-by-bit annihilation.
White genocide basically consists in breeding the White race out of existence by promoting
multiculturalism and mass immigration from the Third World into our White homelands. Inevitably, over the course of time,
this would lead to the mongrelization of Whites through interbreeding with the darker races of Africa, Asia and the Islamic
people of the Middle East. An added bonus would be a marked decline in the general IQ of the neo-European mongrel race,
a race of dark-skinned Untermenschen such as cheerfully envisaged by the founder of the pan-European Union, Count Coudenhove-Kalergi:
Mensch der fernen Zukunft wird Mischling sein. Die heutigen Rassen und Kasten werden der zunehmen-den Überwindung von
Raum, Zeit und Vorurteil zum Opfer fallen. Die eurasisch-negroide Zukunftsrasse, äußerlich der altägyptischen
ähnlich, wird die Vielfalt der Völker durch eine Vielfalt der Persönlichkeiten ersetzen.
The man of the far future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and castes will fall victim to the increasing overcoming of space, time, and prejudice. The
Eurasian-Negroid future race, outwardly similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity
prepare the world for this “huge transformation” (Barbara Spectre video), meaning White genocide euphemistically presented as “multiculturalism”,
it was first necessary for international Jewry, with their vast financial resources, to gain almost complete control over
the mass media. Few will now doubt that the Jews have already achieved this, given that they admit it themselves, especially
in the case of Hollywood.
As a consequence of Jewish media control, we are now subjected to constant streams of anti-White propaganda, both
overt and subliminal, designed to make Whites feel bad about themselves as well non-Whites to regard Whites with increasing
contempt and hostility. Whites are not only made to feel guilty about the Holocaust and the crimes of colonialism but to
regard themselves as an essentially flawed race, as morally repugnant and fit only for history’s garbage dump —
in short, as “white trash”.
The soft genocide
of Whites is now being carried out before our very eyes, on a daily basis, as the hordes of the Third World keep pouring
into our White homelands in a never-ending tide. Our end days are fast approaching, unless we can act quickly to turn the
tide back and regain our lost lands.
White Genocide by Design: The Role of the Mass Media in the Destruction of the European People
Introduced by Lasha Darkmoon
IS THIS THE FUTURE?
cannot be commanded, but it can be promoted. Depriving Whites of the possibility to be among themselves in terms of residence,
study, work and recreation is one thing. Suggesting miscegenation in films, TV series and commercials is another thing.
There is nowadays hardly any form of media that is not full of this race mixing propaganda, mostly in subliminal form, and
it is the Jews who control the media.”
— Franklin Ryckaert
LD: This meticulously researched article by Franklin Ryckaert, illustrated
by a revealing 50-minute video at the end, presents the following thesis: it was soon after the Holocaust, perceived by Jews
collectively as the single greatest tragedy in their long history, that a decision was taken for the “Final Solution”
of the European problem: namely, the systematic elimination of the Jews’ perceived relentless oppressors.
Who were these
They were of course the Jews’ European antagonists, the people who had expelled them from their White homelands
over a hundred times in past centuries, subjecting them to constant pogroms and persecutions over the years. In a cataclysmic
climax of anti-Semitic violence, one of these European nations had finally destroyed six million of them during the second
half of World War Two. At any rate, so runs the widely accepted mainstream narrative.
How were the Jews to go about rectifying the
wrongs of history, or to put it another way, how were they to get even? Answer: through “soft genocide”,
a slow and subtle non-violent way of getting rid of their enemies, who, it was thought, would be too stupid to notice their
own demise. Or better still, too impotent to do anything about it.
This soft genocide basically consists in breeding the White race out
of existence by promoting multiculturalism and mass immigration from the Third World into our White homelands. Inevitably,
over the course of time, this would lead to the mongrelization of Whites through interbreeding with the darker races of
Africa, Asia and the Islamic people of the Middle East. An added bonus would be a marked decline in the general IQ of the
neo-European mongrel race, a race of dark-skinned Untermenschen such as cheerfully envisaged by the founder of the
pan-European Union, Count Coudenhove-Kalergi:
Mensch der fernen Zukunft wird Mischling sein. Die heutigen Rassen und Kasten werden der zunehmen-den Überwindung von
Raum, Zeit und Vorurteil zum Opfer fallen. Die eurasisch-negroide Zukunftsrasse, äußerlich der altägyptischen
ähnlich, wird die Vielfalt der Völker durch eine Vielfalt der Persönlichkeiten ersetzen.
The man of the far future will be mixed race. Today’s races and castes will fall victim to the increasing overcoming of space, time, and prejudice.
The Eurasian-Negroid future race, outwardly similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with
a diversity of individuals.
prepare the world for this “huge transformation“, meaning White genocide euphemistically presented as “multiculturalism”, it was first necessary
for international Jewry, with their vast financial resources, to gain almost complete control over the mass media. Few will
now doubt that the Jews have already achieved this, given that they admit it themselves, especially in the case of Hollywood.
As a consequence of Jewish media control, we are now subjected to constant streams of anti-White propaganda, both
overt and subliminal, designed to make Whites feel bad about themselves as well non-Whites to regard Whites with increasing
contempt and hostility. Whites are not only made to feel guilty about the Holocaust and the crimes of colonialism but to
regard themselves as an essentially flawed race, as morally repugnant and fit only for history’s garbage dump —
in short, as white trash.
The soft genocide of Whites is now being carried out before our very eyes, on a daily basis,
as the hordes of the Third World keep pouring into our White homelands in a never-ending tide. Our end days are fast approaching,
unless we can act quickly to turn the tide back and regain our lost lands. [LD]
WHITE GENOCIDE BY DESIGN:
THE ROLE OF THE MASS MEDIA
IN THE DESTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN PEOPLE
by Franklin Ryckaert
Jews are now perceived
in many quarters as “supremacists”, a description they will naturally find offensive. Because of their “chosenness”,
however, it would appear that many Jews feel entitled not only to monopolize the wealth of the world but also to appropriate
its power. This is clearly articulated by their prophet Isaiah in the Old Testament where the Jew is told that foreign kings
“shall minister unto thee” and that he will one day “suck the milk of the Gentiles”:
And the sons of strangers
shall build up thy walls, and their kings shall minister unto thee: for in my wrath I smote thee, but in
my favour have I had mercy on thee.
Therefore thy gates shall be open continually;
they shall not be shut day nor night; that men may bring unto thee the forces of the Gentiles, and that their kings may
For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea,
those nations shall be utterly wasted.
Thou shalt also suck the milk of
the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou shalt know that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer,
the mighty One of Jacob.
Isaiah 60: 10-12, 16; emphasis added.
Following this promise, throughout history the Jews have tried to
appropriate much of the wealth and the power of the world. Unsurprisingly they came into continuous conflict with the whole
world as a result. They have been expelled from several countries more than a hundred times. Instead of readjusting their
behavior, the Jews developed a persecution complex : the whole world is against them “for no reason”. Because
it was mostly European countries that expelled them, the Jews came to consider Europeans as their greatest enemies.
and the intense Holocaust propaganda it brought in its wake — see Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering — the organized Jewish community became convinced that Europeans were a threat
to them as a race and that they should therefore be neutralized as a race; in other words, that
GENOCIDE of the European people, now better known as “White genocide”, would be the “final solution”
to the European problem.
But how could a small ethnic group of only 15 million people like the Jews exterminate ONE
BILLION people of European descent spread out all over the world ? The Jews came to the conclusion that it would be possible
to neutralize Europeans racially, not by physically exterminating them, but by causing them to mix with other races, thus
losing their racial characteristics for good. Mulattoes, Mestizos and Eurasians are no more Europeans, and the Jews believe
such people can be more easily manipulated by them than full-blood Europeans. Thus after the second World War the Jews
concocted a plan to create conditions that would lead on a mass scale to miscegenation and the interbreeding of Europeans
with other races. The effective means of achieving this would be through non-white immigration into white countries. This
is a “soft” genocide, “soft” because no killing or violence is involved.
So the Jews decided to commit a “soft” genocide on Europeans. There are 4
things necessary to make such an endeavor a success : (1) lowering the white birthrate; (2) opening all white countries to
mass non-white immigration; (3) neutralizing the opposition; (4) promoting miscegenation.
Lowering the white birth rate
At present the birthrate of Europeans is 1.6
children per woman. That is below the 2,1 necessary for replacement. This cannot be blamed on the Jews, but is a correlate
of economical development. Developed East Asian countries have a similar low birthrate.
There are however a number of activities that
tend to lower the birthrate even further. Jews are prominent in all these activities, which are: the promotion of transgenderism,
homosexuality, pornography, promiscuity, birth control, abortion and feminism. Feminism is the greatest additional contributor
to the low birthrate of Europeans and Jews are disproportionally dominant in this movement. (see List of Jewish feminists)
Opening all white countries to mass non-white immigration
European countries were never meant to be immigration countries, and the traditional
immigration countries such as the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Argentina also, until recently accepted only European
immigrants. That has changed dramatically since the mid 1960s and many white countries receive now more non-white than white
immigrants. They are expected to become majority non-white within a few decades. The name “Muhammad” is now
the most popular name for newly born boys in many big cities of Western Europe. It can be demonstrated that in all cases
Jewish lobbying was behind this change in immigration policies.
(See extensive endnote, with
numerous links, on Jewish influence in shaping immigration policy in the US, Canada, Australia, Britain, Sweden and Ireland).
The recent “refugee” crisis, as is becoming increasingly clear to many who were unaware of this fact
before, is also of Jewish making. The destruction of Libya and the attempt to destroy Syria happened all according to the
Oded Yinon Plan, an Israeli plan to weaken all Muslim countries from Morocco to Pakistan, in order to facilitate Israel’s
regional hegemony. All those “Syrian refugees” (80% of whom are neither Syrian nor refugees), are directed –
not to the rich Arabian Gulf states, let alone to Israel – but to Europe and other white countries. Jewish organizations,
the ubiquitous George Soros, and even an Israeli “humanitarian” organization called IsraAid are heavily involved.
the Jewish plan to flood all white countries with non-white immigrants has been such a smashing success, the Jews and their
lackeys need to prevent the indigenous Whites from resisting their acute demographic dispossession and they resort to various
means to neutralize the opposition.
Following are the means they use : (1) argumentation, (2) prohibition, (3) discrimination,
(4) denigration, (5) racial disnormativation.
(1) Argumentation: Arguments in favor of mass non-white immigration are
of economical, cultural and moral kinds. Immigration from the Third World is allegedly necessary for work the indigenous
workers refuse to do, for the payment of pensions, for care of the elderly or for filling the gaps of a growing economy.
These arguments are all bogus. Any society develops an economy commensurate with its own size, therefore it can by definition
supply a workforce sufficient for its needs. Third World immigration, it is alleged, would also be culturally enriching.
In reality the bulk of immigrants have low education, are hostile to their new country and concentrate in ghettos without
integrating. Accepting refugees from the Third World would be a “moral obligation” even though such refugees
could be temporally housed in camps within their own region and repatriated after the crisis is over.
If “positive” arguments fail, then
objectors to immigration always can be accused of “racism”, as if not every ethnic group has legitimate ethnic
rights, among which is the right to remain the majority in its own territory. The accusation of “racism” is the
strongest weapon in this battle.
(2) Prohibition: Criticism of the presence or (mis)behavior of immigrants
is severely punished by Orwellian “Human Rights Commissions”, “Racial Equality Commissions”, “Anti-Discrimination
Commissions” etc. that only exist to nip in the bud any resistance to the agenda of race replacement. In Sweden even
criticism of the government’s immigration policy is now punishable.
(3) Discrimination: Immigrants and minorities
are favoured over Whites when it comes to housing and jobs. They get benefits Whites don’t get (because they are already
“privileged”). Since the money for these benefits must come from somewhere Whites are more taxed than non-Whites,
making the formation of a family more difficult for them, while non-Whites can afford bigger families.
Thus Whites have to toil for their bare existence and in the process work for their own dispossession.
(4) Denigration: To
demoralize the indigenous population, its history is denied, its heroes denigrated and its culture declared as without value.
National symbols such as flags are forbidden because they would be “offensive” to immigrants. Christian symbols
are not allowed because they would be “offensive” to Muslims.
(5) Racial disnormativation: You will not find
the word “disnormativation” in a dictionary, because I have myself invented it. I use this term in combination
with the adjective “racial” to denote the policy of replacing persons who are “normative” for a people
of a certain race with people of a different race, thus causing a sense of alienation. In white countries persons who are
normative, such as anchormen on TV, misses in beauty contests etc., are replaced by people of color, by preference Blacks.
The selection of
Barak Obama as president of the US was in effect such an act of racial disnormativation, orchestrated by Jews of course.
Racial disnormativation has also penetrated the world of films, TV series and commercials. One would get the impression
that at least half of the population consists of Blacks, judging from their absurd overrepresentation in the media. This
is done on purpose to demoralize the white population in order to make them accept their dispossession.
Miscegenation cannot be commanded, but
it can be promoted. Depriving Whites of the possibility to be among themselves in terms of residence, study, work and recreation
is one thing. Suggesting miscegenation in films, TV series and commercials is another thing. There is nowadays hardly any
form of media that is not full of this race mixing propaganda, mostly in subliminal form, and it is the Jews who control
“Miscegenation cannot be
commanded, but it can be promoted.”
— § —
IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA
As Illustrated by the 50-minute video below
Following is a video with a collection of scenes from commercials and films in which the Jewish plan to exterminate
the white race by “soft” genocide is hidden in suggestive subliminal messages. The real purpose of these productions
is not to sell goods or to entertain, but to promote the inglorious end of the white race through miscegenation, dispossession
and race war.
The commercials sell the ideas of homosexuality, interracial adoption, marriages between white women and black men
and the production of Mulatto children until they form the majority. The films sell the ideas of “evil white racism”(especially
of Southerners), the total dispossession of Whites, the surrender to a mass invasion of “refugees”, race war
and murder of “Nazis” by Jews.
In the commercials the idea of homosexual marriage is sold as a “normal” variety
of marriage, first between two white men and then between a white and a black man. Such couples are then allowed to form
a “family”, first by adopting children of their own race, and then by adopting interracially. This is a combination
of three Jewish agendas : 1) degrading normal marriage, 2) promoting sterility of Whites, 3) promoting race mixing.
part of the commercials is about the subliminal promotion of marriages between white women and black men and the production
of Mulatto children.
Normally, differences in race form a formidable obstacle to marriage. That can only be overcome by creating a very
strong attraction. Men are mainly attracted by the beauty and loveliness of women. White men don’t find black women
particularly attractive, therefore the Jews have concentrated their efforts on white women.
Women are not in the first place attracted by
the handsomeness of men, but by their strength and competence. There are sound biological reasons for this fact. In order
to give birth to children and raise them, women need men who can protect them and provide for them. A woman therefore seeks
a protector and a provider in a man, so if a man of another race seems to be stronger and more competent than a man of her
own race, a woman is inclined to go for that man of the other race.
And so it is that White woman are being brainwashed, day
after day by the mass media, into finding black men far stronger and more sexually dynamic than the men of their own race.
The Jews understand this and in the numerous commercials and films they produce they
always depict the white man as cowardly, weak, foolish, stupid and boring in contrast to the black man who is depicted as
strong, masculine, intelligent, fascinating. The white woman then goes for the black man, eventually marries him and produces
mulatto children — by which the “soft” genocide of the white race is inexorably achieved.
Following are the
recurrent themes in the mass media, which the video below will help to illustrate:
1. White men are weak
: A clumsy white man always types with caps but can’t help himself. A clumsy white worker nearly hits his own feet
with a drill. A weak feminized white man is scolded by his wife for being a total loser. A white man poses for a group photo
with blacks. The black photographer gestures him to step back a little. The clumsy white man tries to do that but falls
backwards. All blacks laugh.
2. White men are inferior to blacks
Examples : A big, dominant, successful black man juxtaposed
to a weak looking white man. A black stern looking highway patrol officer follows a smallish white man, driving incorrectly.
A black woman lectures high-handedly clumsy whites about the need for a lawyer in tricky situations. A well dressed black
gentleman sitting in an easy-chair in the lounge of a hotel, has his shoes polished by a submissive white man.
white woman choses a superior black man over an inferior white man
Example : A white man and a black man
go to a restaurant. The clumsy white man doesn’t know what to order (he is “incompetent”). The black man
knows exactly what to order (he is “competent”). The white waitress is charmed by the competent black man. She
says :”That’s hot”. The white man asks : “What’s hot, the chilli or the chicken?” The
waitress indicates that it’s the black man that is “hot”.
4. A white woman is married to a black man
: A black man is sitting in a romantic pose with his white wife on a bed. They eat white cream. A song sounds in which the
words love, joy, and happiness occur. Everything is sweet and romantic.
A happy coal-black bridegroom and his white bride dance in the wood, embrace each other closely,
stand in the surf of the sea, reach with their arms to the sun. Beautiful music sounds. Every thing is sweet and romantic.
black and white couple has a mulatto child
Example : A little mulatto girl discusses the merits of cheerios with
her white mother, while her black father sleeps on the couch. The mulatto girl is cute and disarmingly charming. This mixed
family is depicted as perfectly normal.
6. The whole family, father, mother and children consists of mulattoes
: The scene of an all-mulatto family. The mother and all four children have afros. They are presented as the “typical”
American family. Notice that the Jews, who don’t want Whites to have many children, suddenly suggest a big family.
That is because they want the whole white population to become mulatto.
As for the films, Steven Spielberg’s Dream Works Studios produced
films with as theme “evil white racists” (Amistad, The Help, Lincoln), “bigotted whites”
(Meet the Parents, Stepford Wives, Anchorman) and a film about a black American president (Deep Impact)
to prepare the American public for what the Jews would later orchestrate in reality.
The Weinstein Brothers are more revengeful in
the anti-white themes of their films. They too produced films with the “evil white racists” theme (The Great
Debaters, You don’t mess with the Zohan, The Butler, The Equalizer, Crossing Over) but then went over to the “anti-white
revenge” theme (Mandela, Django Unchained, Inglorious Basterds).
Inglorious Basterds is no more than a rather pathetic Jewish revenge fantasy.
All in all, Jewish commercials and films
contain both overt and subliminal anti-white propaganda, with a thinly disguised wish to cause a “soft” white
genocide by mixing Whites with Blacks or other races. The end result is mongrelization or a race of half breeds. Whites
have already begun to die out and disappear from our traditional white homelands, as you can see from the picture below:
Click on this text to hear exactly Who Is Pushing for Mass Refugee Migration? "Jewish Organizations of All Kinds, THAT'S WHO"...
SINISTER CABAL BEHIND RACE-MIXING COMMERCIALS
Ethnic-Europeans, who make up 95% of the smallest continent, are baffled by the sinister anti-White propaganda
displayed in commercial advertising. Propaganda promoting mixed-race relationships, particularly white women with black
men, has become so general, even the least observant have begun to notice.
Based on small glimpses
of marketing sub-culture, one might assume half or more of all relationships involve some sort of race-mixing. The combination
of white women with black men is the most common mixed-race couple depicted in race-hate advertising.
If race diversity advertising
was truly about appealing to the greatest number of customers or potential customers, it seems an odd strategy to focus so
much on one combination, while ignoring so many others. This suggests a sinister and subliminal purpose behind the race
MIXED RACE IDEAL IS A LIE
Research reveals that ethnic-Europeans are the least likely to marry outside of their race. Mixed race relationships
are provably flawed. In terms of combined average incomes of interracial marriages, black husbands with white wives earned
the lowest amount of any other combination. The black husband and white wife combination were also the least educated.
Of the interracial combinations,
marriages between whites and blacks were found to be the least stable, and the most likely to result in divorce. The divorce
rate is higher in all interracial marriages for white women relative to a white marriage.
A study of over two
million online dating interactions revealed distinct racial preferences between groups. White women are strongly against
race-mixing, they respond most frequently to white men and least frequently to black men. In light of this data, it
is all the more bizarre that the combination of a white woman with a black man is seen so frequently in advertising.
RACE BASTARDISATION HAS PROVED
TO BE A CATACLYSMIC FAILURE
Sexually transmitted disease rates per the 2016 Centre for Disease Control speak for themselves. A
2015 study examined the outcomes of women that have children with black men, the results were staggering. Currently, 70%
of black children are born out of wedlock; however, when the mother is white and the father black, the rate jumps to 97%.
98% of white mothers studied reported the father does not support their children financially, 97% report the father is not
in the child’s life, and 97% of the women have used welfare to help support themselves and their children. Only 10%
of women that have children with black men out of wedlock end up marrying. The vast majority of white women that have children
with black men live far below the poverty line.
Partner violence is
classified as threats, physical, or emotional violence between two people in a committed relationship. The National Centre
for Injury Prevention and Control estimates that relationship violence costs around $4.1 billion a year in medical and mental
health care costs.
youth lacks discernment; the younger the cohort, the more likely they were to say the increase of interracial marriage is
for the better. Liberals were more likely than conservatives to say interracial marriages are for the better. College graduates
were also more likely to support the same fanciful nonsense.
A noted researcher says
that after a considerable amount of spent time in academia he concludes that the longer one spends in academia, the more
apt one is to be indoctrinated by critical theory. There is likely also a self-selection bias at work as well. Those
who are more likely to buy into the narrative of critical theory are more likely to thrive in an environment that echoes
Research 2010 found that 69% of people surveyed said that single women having children is a bad thing, 43% say unmarried
couples raising children is a bad thing, yet hypocritically only 14% say interracial marriage is a bad thing. There is something
particularly dumb about being in favour of interracial relationships, while at the same time conceding the self-destructive
outcomes of those relationships.
Research reveals that
whites are the least likely to marry outside of their race. When white women marry outside of their race they are more likely
to be abused, to become single-mothers, live in poverty, and that whites dating outside of their race exposes us to a higher
chance of contracting a sexually transmitted disease.
We know that despite
fashionable acceptance, white people continue to show a natural disgust response to interracial relationships. We also know
that despite the tsunami of diversity propaganda in films, television, and in advertisements, same-race couples are still
the most common relationships, by far.
MALICE BEHIND RACE-MIXING PROPAGANDA
Few believe that interracial advertising under the guise of “diversity”
is about selling clothes or laundry detergent or cereal. The real purpose of mixed race advertising is to present a distorted
worldview, to humiliate, to mock whites, and to make complacent.
White men are the last
vanguard against the intrigues of an ethnic group who historically hate Europeans. White women are displayed with non-white
men not to sell items but as a tactic of psychological warfare against European culture and civilisation.
White men are rarely
portrayed in a favourable light; they are often the overweight, goofy, clumsy, half-wit that relies on women and non-whites
to save the day.
From films to television
to advertisements, this is an increasingly common anti-white falsehood. The outcomes are socially and individually undesirable,
little if any good comes from promoting white women to date and marry outside of their race. What we are seeing is a systemic
attack on white identity.
The psychological effects
of advertising are well-documented. Advertising has the ability to make people chose an inferior product simply by manipulating
the affective conditioning.
Studies suggest the average American is exposed to as many as 5,000 advertisements in a day. The power of
advertising has the power to condition us to be more accepting of social change. The prevalence of mixed-race couples and
an increase of LGBT representation have in no small way changed social attitudes. Although intuitive reactions of disgust
remain, outward social attitudes have become accepting of all forms of degeneracy and social decay.
TURNING BLACKS AGAINST WHITES
These images have an effect on black
men as well. Blacks are constantly being told by the film industry, TV, and advertising, that dating white women is natural
and are falsely led to believe that white women prefer black men to white partners. Faced by reality, the distaste towards
blacks by white women, causes resentment which leads to rape, violence and the racist humiliation of white women.
Nearly 100% of interracial
rapes are white women being raped by non-white men (National Crime Victimization Survey, 2008, Table
42). These advertising images, which have no small part in warping mentality, not only promote a dysgenic society, they
place Whites in a grave danger.
THE SINISTER HAND BEHIND WHITE GENOCIDE
The most belligerent example of anti-white propaganda came from Netflix via
a set of three commercials for the company. The series of the three Netflix commercials is titled The Couple, which
features a white woman and a black man.
The Netflix commercial
“Open Relationship” depicts two couples, an interracial couple, and a white couple. The white man is depicted
as small, weak, insecure, “non-progressive,” and closed-minded. His white girlfriend quickly decides to
cast him aside to spend the evening with the interracial couple, as the black man quite literally steals the man’s
girlfriend in front of him, humiliating him.
HLG Studios out
of Los Angeles was behind the production of the three creepy commercials. The advertising company has worked on campaigns
for a myriad of national brands, from fast food chains to banks, technology companies, and clothing retailers. HLG Studios
was founded by Yuri Baranovsky, the same carpetbagger who directed Netflix’s race-mixing, anti-white propaganda pieces.
Yuri Baranovsky is Jewish, an ethnic group that is vehemently opposed to Jews forming relationships outside their own ethnic
Just four Jewish owned
mega-corporations control the vast majority of all advertising agencies. The Omnicom Group of New York, WPP of London, Publicis
of Paris, and Interpublic of New York are the key corporations in the West.
The New York Times states that these companies are so powerful
“they can indirectly set network television schedules and starve magazines to death or help them to flourish,”
by deciding how and when to spend advertising dollars. Each company owns dozens if not hundreds of smaller agencies;
Omnicom has bought over 150 firms alone.
Globalist CEO John Wren currently heads Omnicom Group. Omnicom was founded by Allen Rosenshine, Keith Reinhard,
and John Bernbach, all three are Jewish and promote the exclusivity of Jews ~ but work hard to destroy ethnic-European ethnicity.
Long-standing CEO of
Publicis (1987–2017) has been Maurice Lévy, who cited his rabbi grandfather as his greatest inspiration. Lévy
has been honoured by the Anti-Defamation League, for his work fighting anti-Semitism, and his relentless promotion of “diversity”.
WPP of London was founded
and is currently run by Martin Sorrell, who is a Jew. Chairman and CEO of the Interpublic Group (IPG), is Michael Isor Roth.
Roth condemned the “white supremacist ideology” at Charlottesville as he wrote in an internal creepy-weepy memo
to 50,000 IPG employees.
There is clearly a disproportionate
number of Jews and those with Jewish sympathies involved in mass media advertising. From small start-up firms to multi-billion-dollar
corporations, all of which are promoting hostile anti-white falsehoods, while praising “diversity” and “inclusion.”
If you wanted to destroy
a civilization, how would you go about it? If you wanted to create a dysfunctional and impotent society, what would be your
weapon? What better way to destroy the white family than to encourage white people, especially white women, to mate with
foreign men unlikely to support them or raise their children.
If you wanted to create
a chaotic society that is easy to lord over, you would ensure that the children are raised by and are dependent upon the
state whilst the menfolk are marginalised and seen as social pariahs by their own people. What better way to destroy a people
than to promote a relationship that can never produce white children and that is by nature race destructive? It is carefully
calculated ethnic-European genocide fuelled by Jewish hatred for Christian Europeans.
The media, the press,
and advertisers – and businesses that use these race-destroyers have created a culture of anti-white hatred. These
companies are not merely promoting racial bastardisation and trying to appeal to a wider range of consumers, they are promoting
the increased abuse and sexual degradation of white women.
These iniquitous advertising
corporations are not selling products, which they anyway fail to move from the store shelves. Great department stores like
House of Fraser, Debenhams and similar, who used these Jewish controlled products, are falling like flies. These once great
companies simply do not have non-Jewish marketing agencies; they are victims of Jewish monopoly too.
purpose is to recreate a nation without ethnic-Europeans. Race mixing propaganda says bluntly that white children are not
wanted in the New Order and White men have no place in the globalists’ nightmarish world.
IS THERE AN ANTIDOTE
How can ethnic-Europeans challenge the
Jewish War against ethnic-Europeans? An expert writes, “Every single time I come across an advertisement that highlights
“diversity” in an absurd way or promotes miscegenation, I make a point to share it online and with my friends
I personally take note
of companies that insist on promoting miscegenation and do not spend my money with them. If they want the “diverse”
consumer, they can have them.
The future of civilization,
the future for our people, is only being offered by one group of people, and that is us. We are in many ways the last vanguard
against a system that would greatly prefer our extinction. Every film that has a hostile anti-white message should be reviewed,
critiqued, and dissected by those writing articles and creating podcasts.
the intellectual ability to develop their own critiques, to be warriors against this cultural insurrection, and to let anti-white
Jewish racists know a worldwide Christian boycott against mix race advertising will destroy their malicious miscegenation
strategy. The message is, refuse to purchase goods from any company that uses racist advertising to promote race bastardisation.
The belief that “immigrants with
college degrees” are bringing great skills to the US is completely false, as U.S.-degree holders out-score foreign-educated
immigrants by a wide margin, according to literacy, numeracy, and computer operations administered by the Program for International
Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC).
(The New Observer)
As detailed in a new report produced by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), while the “percentage of immigrants who arrive with a college
or advanced degree has risen over the past decade, the extent to which foreign education translates into useful skills here
in the United States is an open question.”
Based on English-language tests of literacy, numeracy, and computer operations administered by the Program for International
Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), the CIS study found that “among test-takers with at least a college education,
U.S.-degree holders out-score foreign-educated immigrants by a wide margin.”
For example, among those with at least a college degree, native-born Americans
score at the 74th percentile on literacy, while U.S.-educated immigrants score at the 66th percentile, and foreign-educated
immigrants score at just the 42nd percentile.
“Policy-makers should therefore be cautious in treating foreign degrees as evidence of ‘high-skill’
immigration,” the report said.
Other key points in the report revealed that:
* Among immigrants in the United States whose highest degree is either
a bachelor’s (“college”) or a master’s or Ph.D. (“advanced”), about 40 percent received
their highest degree in a foreign country — meaning they are “foreign-educated”.
* On both literacy and computer operations, foreign-educated immigrants
with a college or advanced degree perform so poorly that they score at the level of natives who have only a high school diploma.
* On numeracy, foreign-educated immigrants
with a college or advanced degree perform closer to the level of natives who have some college education, but not a bachelor’s.
* Despite their reputation for specializing
in “Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics” (STEM) fields, about one in six foreign-degree holders
score “below basic” in numeracy.
* The skill gap between foreign and U.S. degree holders persists even among immigrants who have had at least five
years in the United States to learn English.ú
The results “explain why the rising education level of new immigrants has not improved employment, income,
poverty, and welfare use as much as expected,” the report added.
“Policy-makers should be cautious in treating foreign degrees as evidence of
‘high-skill’ immigration. If legislators are considering a move towards a merit-based system, they should look
beyond educational credentials,” the report writer said.
Click on this text to see The Truth About 'Refugees'...
We (at TOMATO BUBBLE) recently stumbled across an item which
we found so profoundly disturbing that we initially suspected
it to be a hoax for the simple reason that it was just a bit too "in your face" to
be true. But alas, because the hour of "their" final triumph approaches so rapidly and so
unimpeded, "they" evidently believe that there is no longer anything to fear about such blatant
in-your-faceness as what we are about to present. We are sorry to have to say that the following story
of the Paris White Genocide mural, and its creator's background and connections, is indeed accurate.
OF THE IMAGERY BELOW, THOUGH CARTOONISH IN NATURE, IS OBSCENE AND VIOLENT
mural painting on the floor below Paris' iconic Eiffel Tower was completed in September of 2016 by a
Los Angeles-based artist named Cleon Peterson. The bizarre "work of art"
is titled, "Endless Sleep" -- an obvious reference to the coming "endless sleep"
of the White Race. There is really no need for us to interpret the meaning of Peterson's obscenity. To all but the most
brain-dead libtard, the massive 500 square-meter image, best viewed from the top of the Eiffel Tower
while looking straight down, speaks for itself.
Have a look:
1. Cleon Peterson
2 & 3: Black figures are superimposed over the White characters, as a Black male
and White female embrace passionately in the center. The linked arms of
the Blacks form a 6-pointed Star of David.
The Star of David at the center is an obvious tribute to the terrible Tribe that is behind
White Genocide and to the House of Rothschild in particular. But don't take our word for it. Here it
is, from a tweet, from Peterson himself:
Peterson, an "ex" heroine addict,
tweeted out his gratitude to French banking couple Benjamin and Ariane
de Rothschild. We suspect (though we have no solid evidence to present) that the "gratitude"
is related to Peterson (with 10 helpers) having been commissioned to paint the disgusting White Genocide
there be any remaining doubt as to what the Eiffel Tower floor mural truly symbolizes, a review of
the self-loathing artist's earlier works -- depicting what he refers to as "the
hedonistic triumphs of those
who recognize themselves as victorious in the unfolding mirror of history" -- clearly
confirms what Peterson and the Rothschilds are dreaming about. Be forewarned, these images are obscene and unsettling.
DON'T SAY WE
DIDN'T WARN YOU!
-- and don't send
us nasty E-mails for publishing them.
Before hooking up with the Rothschilds
and painting Paris, Peterson was known for churning out scenes of torture, rape and mass murder of White
people at the hands of Blacks --- a perfect hireling for the Rothschilds!
Plenty more such as this.
In his 1925 book 'Praktischer
Idealismus', the half-Austrian / half-Japanese Globalist Count Richard Coundehove
Kalergi boldly declared that the citizens of the future "United States
of Europe" will not be White people anymore. In
his own words, the man who is today regarded as one of the founders of "modern Europe" revealed
man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear
due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race
of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace
the diversity of peoples with the diversity of individuals.
Of course, Kalergi's
chosenite paymasters will not be replaced or blended out by this "Eurasian-negroid race of the future". Wrote
the hired hack of his beloved Rothschild bosses:
"Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against
her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future
status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process.
It's not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual
nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created
a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy
crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews."
The artistic abomination at the Eiffel Tower is "The Kalergi Plan" --- in paint. The end game is upon us, and for those who think that the final stages of genocide
will be manifested by a peaceful and gradual blending-out of the last remaining non-elite White Europeans,
Peterson's previous paintings, and Rothschild's evident affinity for them, ought to dispel that delusion
once and for all.
on behalf of Rothschild & Friends, foresaw the current Turd World invasion of Europe. If they have
their way, the end to an aging and morally decadent White Europe will come violently for many.
Mass Killing White People is the #1 Priority of the Rothschild Family
Last September, an artist was hired by the French government to create a giant mural beneath the Eiffel Tower. The artwork took approximately 300 hours of work and was accomplished through the dedication of 10 painters – the
artist? Cleon Peterson.
Peterson is an artist from Los Angelos whose paintings are said to symbolise a “struggle between power and submission in the fluctuating architecture of contemporary society.”
Below is a picture of the mural as seen from above via digital medium:
“Endless Sleep,” a painting that rests beneath
the Eiffel Tower as of September 2016.
Upon initial inspection, it is entirely possible to interpret Peterson’s artwork as a representation
of overcoming racism, with black and white figures holding the hands of their respective fellows and dancing together around
a monochrome couple. But there are a few disturbing hang-ups. For example, the shape itself is akin to the Star of David.
The black figures are holding hands over the genitalia of each white figure. The couple in the middle wrapped in a romantic
embraced appear to be the source of the dancing figures’ joy. But is this celebration concerned with overcoming racism,
or rejoicing over the abolition of native Europeans? Other artwork produced by Peterson has more blatant overtones, and
through surveying the context of Peterson’s artistic vision, one can easily understand what the above mural is intended
“The Hanging Tree,” (2015).
In “The Hanging Tree,” we witness similar racial
tension between the black and white figures, with three of the black figures admiring the result of their handiwork: the
lynching of a white man. Meanwhile, two black figures club – or slice, the precise nature of their weapons are dubious
– two white figures to death. There are numerous other paintings by Peterson that depict similar and worse gruesome
scenarios. Including the desecration of the Statue of Liberty, rape, and the portrayal of white figures as degenerate, self-harming individuals.
Interestingly, Peterson has created such violent artwork without bringing racial
tensions to the forefront of its meaning (there is plenty of black-on-black violence artwork, for example). But out of all his projects, the white figures are never depicted as violent or particularly dangerous. The Occidental Observer has noted that even in all-white paintings, they are depicted as a people incapable of thinking for themselves, doomed
to a life of drunkenness and stupidity.
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of Peterson’s
work is that he was commissioned to paint a boat for a company founded by Benjamin de Rothschild in 2001 (the company is
called Gitana). The boat was named after Edmund de Rothschild and is called Gitana 17 for short, skippered by Sebastian Josse. According to the Rothschild Archive, the Rothschild family has nearly always had a passion for yachts and sailing beginning
early in the 19th century. Today, Peterson’s racially motivated artwork is being incorporated by the Rothschilds into
their love for sailing, conveying a nod towards Peterson’s artistic representation of a racially motivated violent
Peterson has claimed that “the world and people’s motives are exceedingly complex and what seems heroic and just on one side is
often the opposite on the other,” inferring that he empathises with violent extremist ideologies. In an interview, he expressed a belief that “the race situation… is a subject that’s totally neglected and not confronted
at all. We do things on a surface level… racism today has become systemic and deeply rooted within economics and
politics and housing developments and the jail system. There’s so many layers of unfairness, and you see how shit boils
up.” Peterson has also professed to consider his work to have a timeless quality, saying that his artwork is not “nailed
down in time” and that it could be depicting a racial revolution from hundreds of years ago, today, or, as it is inferred,
in the future.
These grotesque black-and-white paintings by Peterson are inherently prophetic, and
the mural beneath the Eiffel Tower celebrates the dissolution of native Europeans either through violent domination or mass
immigration. As Peterson has been funded by a Rothschild organization, his artwork now depicts a scene that the most powerful
family in the world seeks to make a reality: control. Peterson’s work is about domination and abolition,
brutally dismantling the existence of white figures. Titling his painting with labels such as “Justice” and
Vengeance,” Peterson is seeking to convey a subliminal nod towards what could be a racially motivated war on the horizon.
Click on this text to see how Israel is Directly Helping Muslims And Africans Invade Europe...
Click on this text to hear ROTHSCHILD GENOCIDE: INNOVATING THE POPULATION TO ZERO -- with Deborah Tavares...
THE 'ABDICATION' OF THE WHITE
By Mike King
This isn't about hating other races. It's
about saving European Man from deliberate destruction!
Political puppets generally have
a personal buffer between themselves and the big masters. Woodrow Wilson had Edward Mandell House; FDR
had Henry Morgenthau; Barack Obama has Valerie Jarrett.
For Winston Churchill, the personal handler, and a probable
homosexual lover (here), was Frederick A. Lindemann a physicist whose German-Jewish
family arrived in England when he was about 14 years old. He was known to friends as "the Prof"
in reference to his position at the University of Oxford, and as "Baron Berlin" to his many
detractors because of his German accent and haughty aristocratic manner.
Lindemann believed that a small circle
of elites should run the world, resulting in a stable society, "led by supermen and served by
helots." He believes that science can yield a race of humans blessed with
“the mental makeup of the worker bee.”
In Lindemann's Jewish supremacist worldview, the "worker bees" would
be mixed race and the "supermen" would no doubt be the Zionist elite. Naturally, before this New World
Order can emerge, the 'White Man' would have to first "abdicate"
his leading position on Europe and America.
excerpt from 'The Prof' --one of the many the biogarphies written about Lindemann:
“Professor Frederick Lindemann,
the Chief Advisor to Winston Churchill and the inspiration and architect of the air crucifixion of Germany
was in a reflective mood after the war. Toward
the end of his life, Lindemann made a remark on more than one occasion with such an air of seriousness
that he seemed to regard it as his testament of wisdom, and I accordingly feel it incumbent upon me
to record it here, although not.in.perfect.sympathy with it.
'Do you know,' he asked, 'what the future historians will regard as the most important event of this age?’
‘Well, what is it?’
will not be Hitler and the Second World War; it will not be the release of nuclear energy; it will not
be the menace of Communism.'
These negatives seemed very comprehensive. He
put on an expression of extreme severity and turned down the corners of his lips: ‘It
will be the abdication of the White man.’ Then
he nodded his head up and down several times to drive home his proposition."
* The Prof’ -- R.F Harrod, McMillan, 1959. Page 261/2. A Personal Memoir
Lindemann was the true architect
of the Dresden Holocaust of innocent Germans. --- all part of the "abdication" of "The
White Man" to his Tribe.
Understand Professor Lindemann
-- and you will understand the higher purpose behind the "politically correct" madness of "diversity"
that is sweeping away European Man and European culture.
White Man! The Masters of the New World Order, having already obtained your
"abdication". They are now targeting you for final elimination
in so many little ways that you may not have noticed - as illustrated below.
France 1994 --- France 2006
Europe's National Football teams have abdicated
The $1 Dollar Coin has
Captain America has
"abdicated" to diversity.
Spider Man has
"abdicated" to diversity.
home of Asgard has "abdicated"
to diversity (Heimdall the Gatekeeper).
Little Orphan Annie
has "abdicated" to diversity.
The Morning Show 'Live'
to diversity. (Regis was immensely popular when he was suddenly fired!)
Game-Show 'Family Fued' has "abdicated" to diversity.
The Game-Show 'Let's Make
a Deal' has "abdicated"
NBC Nightly News
* Lyin' Brian Williams was forced out due to a suddenly discovered "scandal."
|James Bond is under
growing pressure to "abdicate"
to diversity. (here)
School System has "abdicated" to diversity.
TV Court Shows have "abdicated"
The Super Bowl Half-time Show has "abdicated"
to diversity (and degeneracy).
have "abdicated" to diversity.
Ms. America Pageants
have "abdicated" to diversity
(Despite being a small fraction
of the general population at large, and a tiny fraction of the overall contestant population; 8 Black
women and 1 Indian-American woman have been crowned winner since 1984).
Bavarian Folk Music &
Dance has "abdicated"
The NBA (National Basketball
Association) has "abdicated"
to diversity. (Why no European-American night?)
The $20 Bill has
"abdicated" to diversity (new bills due
out in 2020).
The culprits behind the "abdication" have been named -- straight from
the horse's own mouth:
"The transformation (to multi-culturalism) must take place. Europe is not going to
be the monolithic society that it once was in the last century. Jews are going to be
at the center of that. Its a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going
into a multi cultural mode and Jews are going to be resented because of our leading role. But
without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive." (here)
- Barbara Lerner Specter
Specter's "migrant" friends are fueling an epidemic of violence
and rape in formerly peaceful Sweden; an emasculated nation of only 10,000,000 with a birth
rate below replacement and 100,000 virile, fertile immigrants pouring in each year.
STOP THE HATE!
by the Jewish-controlled media, mentally diseased and suicidal White libtards, wearing "So Sorry"
T Shirts, chain themselves and beg for Blacks to forgive them for slavery (a trade which was
actually controlled by Jewish merchants).
WAKE A FRIEND! SHARE THIS PIECE!
Geographic now owned by Jews has a cover showing a glaring example of miscegenation of whites in Europe which has been banned
by facebook. When viewing the picture, keep in mind the following "A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century"
by communist Jew, Israel Cohen written in 1912 and read into the Congressional Record in 1957. Don't ever forget that it's
the Jews vs us and whomever wins will determine the fate of the other side.
"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is
racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites,
we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro
minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes.
We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment.
With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America
to our cause."
.....Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for he Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559,
June 7, 1957
THE JEW'S WHITE GENOCIDE PROJECT STARTING
"Hooten Plan" to Genocide the Germans:
1943, prominent American anthropologist Ernest Hooton wrote
an an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” for New York Daily newspaper. The concept was an “outbreeding”
plan to “destroy German nationalism and ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and
sociological capacities.” ....(Earnest Albert Hooton (November
20, 1887 – May 3, 1954) was a Jewish-American physical anthropologist known for his work on racial classification and his popular writings such as the book Up From The Ape. Hooton sat
on the Committee on the Negro, a group that "focused on the anatomy of blacks and reflected the racism of the time).
The Harvard University professor’s proposal called
for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought
into the country in large numbers; and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to 12
million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild
of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization
of German ‘aggressiveness’ by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”
This scheme, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to
be implemented. “During this period, it would encourage the immigration and settlement in Germany of non-German nationals,
especially males,” he wrote.
aspects of the 1943 plan were delayed, in the decades since the end of World War II something of the spirit of the genocidal
Hooton plan is being unleashed on Germany’s population. In actuality, it was jump started given that an estimated
five million or more German POWs (see Rhine-Meadows death camps) and civilians were exterminated and murdered in the Hellstorm
period of 1944-1946. This is hidden history.
Now that Germany’s birth rate is below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants are
welcomed as settlers in Germany. The number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural
character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.
Now come official figures from Germany’s Federal Statistics
Office (FSO): One in three German residents under age 18 have foreign roots.
In Berlin, people with a migration background comprise 30% of residents. Ethnic Germans
are already minority in the district center and many of the surrounding central districts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLRvfuqg_M8 Proxy Highlight
Jan 8, 2017 ... The "Hooton Plan" During
World War II, Hooton proposed to eradicate the German people by infiltrating them slowly with masses of non-European male
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7rMVuETAy0 Proxy Highlight
Sep 21, 2016 ... In German with English subtitles by DIDI 18. Ursula
Haverbeck, the courageous octogenarian previously imprisoned for pointing out the lack of evidence to support the holocaust
delusion, here presents details of the planned genocide of the european christian peoples via The Hooten Plan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-s9_8-WIFg Proxy Highlight
Sep 24, 2016 ... Ursula Haverbeck, the courageous octogenarian previously
imprisoned for pointing out the lack of evidence to support the holocaust delusion, here presents de...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--XGno0izxA Proxy Highlight
Sep 24, 2016 ... Ursula Haverbeck talks about the migrant crisis in
Europe, Germany, the world wars, Hooton plan, Nizer plan, Morgenthau plan, and more. https://www.youtube. c...
Sep 20, 2016 ... The Hooton Planand the Migrant Crisis SUBTITLED IN
ENGLISH BY DIDI 18, this is an almost 30 minute video by Ursula Haverbeck explaining why Europe is being invaded ... it's
all in the Hooton Plan! Only one book describing the Hooton Plan is still available, but only in German. Ursula tells us
that four ...
Sep 21, 2016 ... In German with English subtitles by DIDI 18. Ursula
Haverbeck, the courageous octogenarian previously imprisoned for pointing out the lack of evidence to support the holocaust
delusion, here presents details of the planned genocide of the European christian peoples via The Hooten Plan.
www.newnationalist.net/2017/06/11/germany-to-be-trans... Proxy Highlight
Jun 11, 2017 ... In practice a much more horrific version
of the Hooton Plan was jump started with a genocide. An estimated five million or more German POWs (see Rhine- Meadows death
camps- You Tube banned in Europe) and civilians were exterminated and murdered in the Hellstorm period of 1944-1946 –
(You Tube ...
Click on this text to have the Coudenhove Kalergi Plan For White Genocide Explained...
A response to anyone who delares GO BACK TO EUROPE...
Click on this text to watch ANTI WHITE MESSAGES IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA...
Click on this text to see Zionist Jews Happily Brag About Being At The Center Of The Muslim Invasion Of Europe...
WHY DO WHITE PEOPLE
HATE WHITE PEOPLE
Anti-White racism is widespread and the worst offenders are brain-washed self-haters. Ethnic self-loathing
is uniquely a White phenomena. Peoples across the world are baffled by the perversity of ethnic self-loathing and the desire
to bring about the destruction of one’s own ethnicity, culture and history through race-mixing.
Spain currently tops the list of Mediterranean countries by the number of migrant sea arrivals.
Over 47,500 migrants arrived in the country since the beginning of the year. When illegal migrants reach
Spanish soil they are not arrested and shipped back. No, they cavort as they celebrate on the red carpet laid out for them.
Without need for identity non-Europeans immediately benefit from resident status and free access to taxpayers purse and
Very few are refugees in the accepted sense of the term: they are economic migrants. Yet,
ethnic-Europeans who share the culture, religion, and history of Europe are made to jump through hoops to acquire residency
in EU countries without guarantee of success. Is this not racism?
Not all Africans
are Black: Hundreds of thousands of ethnic-Europeans endure a squalid soul-destroying existence scattered across the black
republic’s hundreds of South African squatter camps whilst awaiting government-sponsored race genocide. There is no
possibility of their being accepted in Europe. There are no BBC or CNN camera crews to record the misery of these displaced
A Ukrainian orphaned by her parents’ death in a car accident was adopted by a comfortably
off professional English couple. The teenager was happy in England, was schooled and befriended there, but was sent back
to her country where she has no family.
Yet, when illegal immigrants, after being convicted
of multiple serious offences, are obliged to return to their native countries protests erupt and airliners are occupied
and prevented from leaving. Is this not racism?
The British Home Office says ‘it cannot
be satisfied’ that Inga Lockington, a former mayor of Ipswich and town councillor is permanently resident in England.
She has lived and worked in the UK since 1979.
Inga Lockington with her letter from the Home Office and her Danish
passport from the 70s
Is this not
anti-White racism when set against the hundreds of thousands of unidentifiable benefit-bandits granted citizenship and passports
despite lacking skills, shared culture or self-sufficiency?
Daily the immigrants parade along highways built
by impoverished White road workers. They use schools built by the generations who gave their lives for Britain, they live
in homes not built by their own kind but by the Whites they despise.
The son of a former
British High Commissioner was denied a UK passport as he was born in a Caribbean state where his father served as British
High Commissioner to Trinidad and Tobago from 2011 to 2014.
The former diplomat said he was left feeling “powerless
and nervous” after the Home Office refused to grant his new-born son a passport. He said it illustrated a “cultural
(ethnic) priority within the Home Office to reject wherever possible”.
A Northern Ireland-born woman and her American husband’s application
for residency has been denied.
Why do ethnic-Europeans
already living in Europe find it almost impossible to take up residency in other EU nations? Such anti-White racism is institutionalised
apartheid for which the haters responsible will one day be held accountable and hopefully exiled. The lowest form of race
hater is the self-loathing hater. If these race-haters love migrants so much then they and their hapless families
are welcome to join migrants and so they will.
Even those whose original European forebears emigrated
are denied residency in the motherlands. Britons whose parents emigrated to the Dominions are sent from the UK back to Australia,
New Zealand, and Canada? Yet, 2.3 billion Commonwealth citizens, 94% of whom are African or Asian, are encouraged to take
out British citizenship by filling the gaps in Britain’s armed forces.
Francoise Milne and Simon Milne with their three children Charlotte, Olivia
Simon Milne MBE, 58, served in Northern Ireland
and Bosnia and is one of 27 Gentlemen at Arms who guard the Queen on royal occasions. His wife and mother of his children,
Francoise, 50, applied for residency but was refused as she could not prove she was ‘self-sufficient’.
A Dutch and Spanish couple who have lived in Britain all their adult lives have told of their
“devastation” after the Home Office refused their post-referendum application to have their two London-born children
recognised as permanent residents of the country.
Jan-Dinant Schreuder and Monica Obiols, both 49,
found themselves in a bureaucratic nightmare when they were told their 15-year-old son and 12-year-old daughter had to provide
more evidence that they lived permanently with their parents.
Monica Obiols and Jan-Dinant Schreuder have a 15-year-old
son and 12-year-old daughter, both of whom were born in London.
“What evidence are they supposed to have? They don’t have council tax bills or proof of where they
live. They are children,” said Obiols. “They have gone to school here all their life, English is their mother
tongue. I was just so shocked when we got the refusal letters.”
Imagine the furore
if such cases as these, and there are hundreds of them, were applied to non-Whites. If we are going to root out racism
what will come out of the lanced boil will undoubtedly have white skins. To achieve this, a body must be urgently set up
to address anti-White racism.
Click on this text to see How America's Borders Were Opened BY THE JEWS...!
Click on this text to see video (before it's deleted from Youtube) of Zio-Jew Bill Kristol freely suggest that what's left
of the "WHITE" working class should be replaced by immigrants ...
Click on this text to watch: Jews Push For White Genocide.....
The white population in the United States has decreased from 79.6
percent in 1980 to 61.9 percent in 2014,
according to a new study
from the University of New Hampshire.
of Latino Americans has risen from 6.4 percent to 17.3 percent over the same time period, while both the African American
and Asian American populations have gone up, the study finds.
The number of non-Hispanic whites who died in 2014 outpaced the number
of white births in 17 U.S. states, representing the largest number of states to experience a natural decrease in the white
population in American history, the study shows.
Researchers at UNH's Carsey School of Public Policy point to an aging white populace,
and a decline in births slowed by the economic recession and by fewer women of childbearing age.
"Decrease is the ultimate demographic
consequence of population aging, low fertility, and a diminishing proportion of the childbearing-age population," researchers
Rogelio Saenz and Kenneth Johnson wrote. "The rapid rise in the number of U.S. states experiencing white decrease reflects
the demographic changes underway."
Nationally, the number of whites born in 2014 is only slightly higher, 2.15 million, than the
number of whites who died, 2.06 million. A decade ago, white births outpaced deaths by nearly 400,000 each year. The ratio
of white births to deaths fell 79 percent between 1999 and 2014.
Members of the baby boom generation, a generation with a greater percentage
of whites than younger generations, are beginning to reach retirement age, and mortality rates are rising. Today, the median
age of a white American is 43, four years higher than it was in 2000. The number of white Americans over the age of 65 has
jumped from 15 percent to 18 percent of the overall white population.
By contrast, the average American Latino is just 28 years old. Latino
birth rates exceeded death rates in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, the researchers find.
Nationally, the number of white Americans
is expected to begin declining in absolute numbers between 2030 and 2040, according to projections from the U.S. Census
Bureau. By 2050, whites are expected to make up less than half the U.S. population.
Whites experienced natural declines mostly in northeastern, eastern
and southern states, according to data from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control
The rapidly aging white population and fast-growing younger minority groups are speeding demographic changes across
the country, hastening a political divide likely to have long-term ramifications, a TheHill news daily report commented.
And there is little
chance that the decreases will reverse since researchers routinely find that once a natural decrease begins, it is unlikely
to reverse itself, said the report, citing more states are likely to join the list of white natural decrease in future years
based on the UNH's study.
The growing ranks of aging baby boomers will weigh heavily on the nation's healthcare costs, as older residents
tend to use more health services. The tug and pull between an aging population that is mostly white and a growing, younger
population that is more diverse is likely to set off years of political fights over spending priorities across the country.
Those fights are
already underway, as Republicans and Democrats pull increasing shares of votes from more defined demographic groups, said
| || |
| || |
Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?
United Nations projections indicate that
over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face
population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will
require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to
Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report
considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of
Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European
Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population
decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.
The following documents are in PDF format. To be able to
view and print pages from these files you will need the Acrobat Reader software. If you do not already
have this plug-in installed on your computer, click here to download it free of charge.
The Press Release
is available in
Jewish people collectively work as
an army of bees. The Christians see one bee and think it is not so dangerous and that it is better to avoid it. What the
Christians can't understand is the danger of the tribe, the group of bees, when they all work together to destroy one enemy.
Jews are the most coward,
but the smartest and most satanic people on earth. It is their nature and it is now a part of
their DNA. The proof is, everywhere in all Western countries of the world, ask any Jew what he thinks about immigration,
even Islamic immigration to the country where he is born; Most Jews favor "Open Societies" because they fear a
homogeneous people who can at any day open their eyes and recognize that there is a bacteria living with them.
It is why the Jews
collectively favor Multicultural, Multi-racial societies where they can hide and be considered as other "minorities"
ruled by the "evil Whites". The Jew needs to hide because he hates the White race and White civilization especially
if it is Christian. The combination of Whiteness and Christianity is a nightmare for the Jew. The religion of Christianity
opposes the core of his Jewish religion based on lies, hatred, subversion, supremacy, envy, violence. The White race as
well, because the Jew knows which people is constructive, productive and altruistic more than other groups. It is why the
Jew promotes systematically and unconsciously any movement and group of people who can weaken the White Christians.
He likes distraction,
he brings those who hate his host so his host will hate those he brings instead of hating him. The Jew is the corrosive power
in every nation, he is the trigger that doesn't want people to have peace, it is why he brings completely different people
and force them to share the same country so they can fight instead of fighting him. This is the description of "Trigger".
This strategy allows him to rule Western people who are busy hating all the races and religions that the Jew forces on them
after preparing these foreigners to hate their host.
The Jew is a coward, he never fight, he always gets
some group to fight for him, then gets other group to fight the group he was using. He is smart because his God is the Devil
according to Christianity and the Devil is smart, he is a fallen angel. It is why the Jew tried for centuries to remove
Christianity from the West, because he knows that if people apply Christianity, then they will ban the Jews from their countries
as it was the case in all Christian empires.
Jews recently admitted that they prefer Islamic Europe over Christian Europe,
because they consider Christianity "impure". A Rabbi even wrote an article celebrating the Islamization of Europe.
They certainly know that Islamization of Europe will lead to the greatest civil war in History, and it will cause the destruction
of his competitors: the Europeans. It is why in the last 6 decades he was siding with the "Muslim rights" in in
NON-WHITE IMMIGRATION IS JEWISH POLICY. 20 Examples, Jewish Hypocrisy & the Effects on Whites ....... https://youtu.be/zC7_7cyqQ0k
Quotations In Support Of White
"There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s
a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states."
– Wesley Clark,
retired General who commanded Operation Allied Force
in the Kosovo War. (Jewish)
of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia
has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would be more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian."
– Miriam Faine, editor of Australian Jewish
The Census Bureau has just reported that
about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We
have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [Jews] have been nourishing
the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but
the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible …"
– Earl Raab. Writer, previously Executive Director
of the Jewish Community Relations Council.
of America is heartening news of an almost transcendent quality."
– Ben Wattenberg, Jewish writer and journalist.
Jews had always thrived in nations and empires with multicultural, pluralistic and tolerant environments, while they fared
badly in strong ethnic or nationalistic societies. European Jews have always been the emblematic stranger or ‘other’.
Therefore, by definition, a society where the stranger
is welcome is good for the Jews, although they have not always appreciated this link.
The future of European Jewry is dependant on our
ability to shape a multicultural, pluralistic and diverse society."
– Göran Rosenberg, Jewish author and journalist.
Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are
safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic
groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of US Jews to
endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called social issues."
– Charles Silberman, Jewish writer and journalist
"Some time in the distant future, brown people are probably going to—and I say this
without judgment—breed their way to power in both Europe and America. Arab populations are growing in countries like
France and Holland, and I think we all see where this Mexican thing is going in America.
That’s right, because they fuck more, the
darker skinned people are going to rule the world! And white people, for their own self-preservation, should get a start
on being nice to them now! Nice!
– Bill Maher, Jewish TV host, author and comedian.
Zionists Want Multi Cultural Europe And Jewish Only Israel... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHOvGiF_EC8#t=153
The Decay of Western Civilization .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBXoXB3QvyI
Canada to Be 80% Non-White “Within 100 Years”
Current immigration policies will
turn Vancouver into a 70 percent non-white state within two generations, and all of Canada into an 80 percent nonwhite country
within the next 100 years, one of that country’s foremost diplomats has warned.
Writing in the
Vancouver Sun, former ambassador to Asia and the Middle East Martin Collacott said that current Canadian immigration policy
was “replacing its population” and was a “case of willful ignorance, greed, [and] excess political correctness.”
of London professor Eric Kaufmann, Collacott said that “almost seven out of 10 Vancouver residents will be ‘visible
minorities’ [politically correct Canadian code for nonwhite] within two generations and 80 per cent of the
(compared to 20 per cent today) will be non-white in less than century.”
He went on to write:
notes that, with its continuing high immigration intake and the fact that four out of five newcomers are visible minorities,
Canada is undergoing the fastest rate of ethnic change of any country in the Western world.
Questions must be asked about why such drastic population replacement
is taking place and who is benefiting from it.
While Canada has been helped by large-scale immigration at various times in its history,
the current high intake causes more problems than benefits for our current population.
Our economy grows because of the increasing
population, but the average Canadian gets a smaller piece of the bigger pie.
The cost is huge — with latest estimates indicating taxpayers have
to underwrite recent arrivals to the tune of around $30 billion annually. Young people in large cities such as Vancouver
and Toronto are being crowded out of the housing market by sky-high prices caused largely by the ceaseless flow of new arrivals,
and the quality of life of most residents is negatively affected by increased traffic and commute times, along with congestion
and pressure on the health care and education systems.
Despite this, those who profit from mass immigration continue to laud its
benefits. Their claims are not supported by the facts, however.
are not facing looming labour shortages that we can’t meet with our existing workforce and educational infrastructure.
Immigration, moreover, does not provide a realistic means of dealing with
the costs associated with the aging of our population.
Those who seek to benefit from continued high immigration include leaders of political
parties bent on expanding their political base with policies designed to make it easier to come here from abroad and acquire
the full benefits of citizenship. Also active are leaders of immigrant organizations eager to expand their support base and
important influence has been contributions from developers who want an endless supply of new homebuyers and are major funders
of politicians and parties — particularly at the municipal level.
this regard, it is worth noting that not too long ago, leading politicians in Vancouver on both sides of the political aisle
— such as former mayors Art Phillips and Mike Harcourt — were readily prepared to identify high immigration
intake as one of the leading causes, if not the main cause, of rising house prices. Now, however, no Canadian politician
has the guts or integrity to connect the two.
This is not only because they are so heavily indebted to the real estate industry
in one way or another, but also since criticism of mass immigration is treated in many quarters as xenophobic, if not racist,
since newcomers are overwhelmingly visible minorities.
While a moderate degree of diversity can make society more vibrant —
and my own family is an example of this — it is quite a different matter when it develops to a level where it overwhelms
and largely replaces the existing population, particularly when there is no good reason for allowing this to happen.
With current policies,
we will have to find room for tens of millions of more newcomers, most of whom will settle in the already densely populated
areas of the country where most of the employment opportunities as well as their relatives are located.
We will also have to contend with the fact
that many will bring with them values and traditions that may differ in key respects from those of most Canadians, such
as gender equality and concern for protection of the environment.
If Canada continues along its present path as described by Kaufmann, we
will become one of the first and perhaps the only country in the world to voluntarily allow its population to be largely
replaced by people from elsewhere.
Is this what Canadians want for their
children and their descendants? Almost certainly not.
And yet we are letting it happen through a combination of willful ignorance, political
and financial greed and an excess of political correctness.
Are we prepared to do something about it? Sadly, it appears that most Canadians
are too supine or short-sighted to do so — at least at this juncture.
Canadians deserve a full and informed public debate on the extent to which
immigration policy will determine the future of the country. This should form the basis for a sensible public policy based
on the long-term interests of the existing population, rather than those of special interest groups.
Without this we cannot expect our descendants
to inherit a country that is anything like the Canada of today.
From the Bill of 1965, to the N.W.O. ; there's a scary story to be told. And,
a little known politician behind the American onslaught. more at http://quickfound.net/ "Reviews the history of immigration to the United States up to the restrictive law passed in 1924.
a clip of an interview
with jacob javits.
Immigration and Nationality Act repealed the quota system and set a limit of 20000 immigrants who
could come to the ...
A TDC original documentary explaining the history of immigration
to America, from the "Natives" who first populated the land, ...
By the 1830's, tens of thousands of european immigrants were
arriving on America's eastern shores, coming mostly from England, ...
The Truth About America's Survival | Demographics
and Nationality Act of 1965 was another law passed by the elite without the consent of the people and has
related to Open Immigration Jacob Javits 1965
Interviews with the
author of GIVE ME LIBERTY! AN AMERICAN HISTORY Question: What was the significance of the Immigration ...
Dr. Ngai, Professor
of Asian American Studies and Professor of History at Columbia University, discusses the history of ...
The Jewish pull to
keep our boarders wide open.
sure to be a focal point of the 2016 election, longtime NPR correspondent and 'A Nation of Nations' author Tom ...
President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Immigration Act 50
years ago. Now, immigrant rights are questioned, while in 1965, ...