Click on this text to watch Shifting the Blame, Part 1:
President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Jewish Cabal
by VNN research staff
Some of these Jews were directly responsible for plunging America into WWII
by deliberately alienating America
anti-Communist countries such as Germany and Japan long before the outbreak of hostilities.
These Jews also pioneered the idea of Big Egalitarian Government in America;
some of them were later discovered to
have been spies for the Soviet Union.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (photo at right), president of the United States of America, 1933-1945, was himself partly
of Dutch-Jewish ancestry.
1. Bernard M. Baruch -- a financier and adviser to FDR.
2. Felix Frankfurter -- Supreme Court Justice; a key player in FDR's New Deal system.
3. David E. Lilienthal -- director of Tennessee Valley Authority, adviser.
The TVA changed the relationship of government-to-business in America.
4. David Niles -- presidential aide.
5. Louis Brandeis
-- U.S. Supreme Court Justice; confidante of FDR; "Father" of New Deal.
6. Samuel I. Rosenman -- official speechwriter for
7. Henry Morgenthau Jr. -- Secretary of the Treasury, "unofficial"
presidential adviser. Father of the Morgenthau Plan to further ruin Germany and mass murder Germans after WWII.
8. Benjamin V. Cohen -- State Department official, adviser to FDR.
9. Rabbi Stephen
Wise -- close pal of FDR, spokesman for the American Zionist movement, head of The American Jewish
10. Frances Perkins -- Secretary of Labor; allegedly Jewish/adopted at birth; unconfirmed.
11. Sidney Hillman -- presidential adviser.
12. Anna Rosenberg -- longtime labor
adviser to FDR, and manpower adviser with the Manpower Consulting Committee of the Army and Navy Munitions
Board and the War Manpower Commission.
13. Herbert H. Lehman -- Governor of New York, 1933-1942,
Director of U.S. Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations, Department of State, 1942-1943;
Director-General of UNRRA, 1944 - 1946, pal of FDR.
14. Herbert Feis -- U.S. State Department official,
economist, and an adviser on international economic affairs.
15. R. S. Hecht -- financial adviser to
16. Nathan Margold -- Department of the Interior Solicitor, legal adviser.
17. Jesse I. Straus
-- adviser to FDR.
18. H. J. Laski -- "unofficial foreign adviser" to FDR.
19. E. W.
Goldenweiser -- Federal Reserve Director.
20. Charles E. Wyzanski -- U.S. Labor department legal
21. Samuel Untermyer -- lawyer, "unofficial public ownership adviser" to FDR.
22. Jacob Viner -- Tax expert at the U.S. Treasury Department, assistant to the Treasury Secretary.
23. Edward Filene -- businessman, philanthropist, unofficial presidential adviser.
24. David Dubinsky -- Labor leader, president of International Ladies
Garment Workers Union.
25. William C. Bullitt -- part-Jewish, ambassador to USSR [is claimed to be
Jonathan Horwitz's grandson; unconfirmed].
26. Mordecai Ezekiel -- Agriculture Department economist.
27. Abe Fortas -- Assistant director of Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of the Interior
28. Isador Lubin -- Commissioner of Labor Statistics, unofficial labor economist
29. Harry Dexter White [Weiss] -- Assistant Secretary of the Treasury;
a key founder of the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank; adviser, close pal of Henry Morgenthau.
Co-wrote the Morgenthau Plan.
30. Alexander Holtzoff -- Special assistant, U.S. Attorney General's
Office until 1945; [presumed to be Jewish; unconfirmed].
31. David Weintraub -- official in the Office
of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations; helped create the United Nations; Secretary, Committee
on Supplies, 1944-1946.
32. Nathan Gregory Silvermaster -- Agriculture Department official and head
of the Near East Division of the Board of Economic Warfare; helped create the United Nations.
33. Harold Glasser -- Treasury Department director of the division of monetary research. Treasury spokesman
on the affairs of United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration.
34. Irving Kaplan -- U.S. Treasury
Department official, pal of David Weintraub.
35. Solomon Adler -- Treasury Department representative
in China during World War II.
36. Benjamin Cardozo -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
37. Leo Wolman -- chairman of the National Recovery Administration's
Labor advisery Board; labor economist.
38. Rose Schneiderman -- labor organizer; on the advisery board of
the National Recovery Administration.
39. Jerome Frank -- general counsel to the Agricultural Adjustment
Administration, Justice, U.S. Court o Appeals, 1941-57.
40. Gerard Swope -- key player in the creation of
the N.R.A. [National Recovery Administration]
41. Herbert Bayard Swope -- brother of Gerard
Koch -- consumer division, N.R.A. [apparently-Jewish]
43. J. David Stern -- Federal Reserve Board, appointed
44. Nathan Straus -- housing adviser
45. Charles Michaelson -- Democratic [DNC] publicity man
46. Lawrence Steinhardt -- ambassador to Soviet Union
47. Harry Guggenheim -- heir to Guggenheim
fortune, adviser on aviation
Garfield Hays -- adviser on civil liberties
49. David Lasser -- head of Worker's Alliance, labor
50. Max Zaritsky -- labor adviser
51. James Warburg -- millionaire, early backer
of New Deal before backing out
52. Louis Kirstein -- associate of E. Filene
53. Charles Wyzanski,
Jr. -- counsel, Dept. of Labor
54. Charles Taussig -- early New Deal adviser
55. Jacob Baker -- assistant
to W.P.A. head Harry Hopkins; assistant head of W.P.A. [Works Progress Admin.]
56. Louis H. Bean
-- Dept. of Agriculture official
57. Abraham Fox -- research director, Tariff Commission
Wolf -- National Labor Relations Board [NLRB]
59. William Leiserson -- NLRB
60. David J. Saposs --
61. A. H. Meyers -- NLRB [New England division]
62. L. H. Seltzer -- head economist at
the Treasury Dept.
63. Edward Berman -- Dept. of Labor official
64. Jacob Perlman -- Dept.
of Labor official
65. Morris L. Jacobson -- chief statistician of the Government Research Project
66. Jack Levin -- assistant general manager, Rural Electrification Authority
67. Harold Loeb -- economic
68. William Seagle -- council, Petroleum Labor Policy Board
69. Herman A. Gray -- policy committee, National Housing Conference
70. Alexander Sachs -- rep.
of Lehman Bros., early New Deal consultant
71. Paul Mazur -- rep. of Lehman Bros., early consultant for New Deal
72. Henry Alsberg -- head of the
Writer's Project under the W.P.A.
73. Lincoln Rothschild -- New Deal art administrator
JEWS DURING ROOSEVELT ADMINISTRATION
It was widely known among U.S. military intelligence leaders that Jews played a prominent
role in the Roosevelt administration. For this and other reasons, Roosevelt was widely unpopular among most U.S. army officers.
“Years later, the wife
of Colonel Truman Smith recounted the ‘exultation’ and ‘fierce delight’ in their social and political
circle upon hearing the news of Roosevelt’s death. Finally, in her words, ‘The evil man was dead!’ ”
Full document via PBS: here
The foreign-born Felix Frankfurter, a close friend and adviser of Roosevelt, had long been regarded by military
intelligence as a dangerous Jewish radical. Frankfurter’s appointment to the Supreme Court in 1939 and his role in
the New Deal was symbolic of the Jewish control of Roosevelt’s administration. Numerous other Jewish appointments
caused many military officers to suspect Roosevelt of jeopardizing American domestic and foreign policy interests to accommodate
U.S. General George Van Horn Moseley was one of the most
outspoken critics of Jews. Bendersky quotes from Moseley’s writings:
Endowed with “objectionable” hereditary traits preserved by strict
inbreeding, a Jew, Moseley wrote, no matter how assimilated, will always remain a Jew, a permanent “human outcast.”
Describing Jews as “crude and unclean, animal-like things,” he exclaimed, “it is like writing about something
loathsome, such as syphilis.” Insidiously, Jews rise from the underworld to control the economy, then government,
making themselves “all-powerful.” Using international finance simultaneously with communism to further their
selfish ends, they know no loyalty to any country. In the modern world, their ultimate goal is the “destruction of
Christian civilization as we understand it in America today.”
Congressmen were amazed by Moseley’s
outspokenness when he testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee in June 1939. Moseley stated that America
must learn from the experience of other countries. The “murder squads” of the Jewish Communists Trotsky and Bela
Kun killed “millions of Christians” in the Soviet Union and Hungary. In Germany, “fortunately, the character
of the German people was aroused” against the “internationalists” who sold them out at Versailles. Moseley
stated that in developing its own refugee policy, America could benefit from the German response “for settling the
problem of the Jew within their borders for all time.”
Although Moseley’s vehemence made it easy for the
army to publicly dismiss him as an oddity, Moseley’s assertions of Jewish-Communist subversion were a widely held
belief among American military officers. Moseley’s statements differed very little from the depictions of Jews by
General George S. Patton after World War II. Some retired generals would also hold the same views as Moseley into the 1970s.
JEWS FORCE WORLD WAR II
Many military intelligence officers saw Jews as the force behind World War II. Throughout
the 1930s, many military officers foresaw a situation in which Jewish influence would involve the United States in a war
A colonel at the Army War College asked Harvard historian
William Langer why “all one hears is hostility for Hitler and for Germany.” Langer replied:
I think the Jewish influence has a great
deal to do with it. You have to face the fact that some of our most important American newspapers are Jewish-controlled,
and I suppose if I were a Jew I would feel about Nazi Germany as most Jews feel and it would be most inevitable that the
coloring of the news takes on that tinge. As I read the New York Times, for example, it is perfectly clear that
every little upset that occurs (and after all many upsets occur in a country of 70 million people) is given a great deal
of prominence. The other part of it is soft-pedaled or put off with a sneer. So that in a rather subtle way, the picture
you get is that there is no good in the Germans whatever.
John Beaty edited secret daily intelligence reports as a G-2 officer
in Washington between 1941 and 1947. Beaty wrote the book The Iron Curtain over America based on his insights while
inside G-2. He claimed that World War II was an unnecessary war fostered by Jews. The war was designed to kill as many Germans
and Americans as possible by prolonging the war through demands for unconditional surrender and the Morgenthau Plan. The
uncivilized bombing of German cities was also designed to mass murder innocent German civilians.
Beaty described the Holocaust as a “fantastic hoax”
and United States support for Israel as a policy fiasco. The Iron Curtain over America received strong support from
many in the military intelligence community. U.S. General George E. Stratemeyer, for example, said he owed Beaty a great
debt, since from Beaty’s book he finally learned what really occurred back home while he was fighting overseas. Stratemeyer
said that every loyal American should read The Iron Curtain over America.
Many other U.S. military leaders also concluded that
Jews had influenced America to enter World War II. For example, General Albert C. Wedemeyer wrote to retired Colonel Truman
Smith a few years after the war that the British, Zionists, and Communists made American entry into the war inevitable.
Wedemeyer said they were motivated by selfish interests rather than the welfare of humanity. He stated that “most of
the people associated with Communism in the early days were Jews.” Wedemeyer also claimed that Roosevelt’s Jewish
advisers “did everything possible to spread venom and hatred against the Nazis and to arouse Roosevelt against the
POST WORLD WAR II
General George Patton was removed from
his position as military governor of Bavaria after the war for showing too much sympathy for Germans. Patton wrote repeatedly
during the next few weeks about the plot by “Jews and Communists” to remove any officer who stood in the way
of their destructive plans for Germany. Fear of Jewish opinion in the United States made American generals highly sensitive
to criticism that they were treating the Germans too softly. Although most of the civilian German population consisted of
women, children and old men, one general confided that“we are under constant pressure to kick the Germans around.”
American officers and government officials complained incessantly
in private that Jewish “refugees in American uniforms,” together with Jews in the U.S. government, adversely
affected American policy toward Germany. For example, Major Charles Robertson, the American public safety officer in Wels,
Austria, thought Patton was sacrificed merely to please “the blessed Jews.” Robertson said Jews seized businesses
and property from Austrians merely because they had been Nazi Party members. As Robertson portrayed it, Jews had infiltrated
the military government and protected their fellow Jews in all cases.
Other officers confidentially criticized the nonfraternization
and harsh occupation policies, which some considered in large measure Jewish inspired. American Frank Mason reported from
Germany that some refugee officers let Germans starve, treated German POWs with extreme cruelty, and sadistically beat SS
officers. According to Mason, given U.S. policy and the way the press mislead Americans about events in Germany, disapproving
and disgusted officers felt helpless to change the situation.
The emerging Cold War caused military intelligence to
resume its surveillance of Jews and Communists. Confidential intelligence summaries sent to retired general Ralph Van Deman
stated that despite their denials, Jews “made an awful poor showing in World War II”; they were “powerful
enough to pull the strings” necessary to keep them out of combat. The reports indicated that nefarious Jewish activities
were so numerous that even a small staff could not keep up with them. Jewish organizations had unlimited funds and “dwarfed…honest,
patriotic groups into insignificance.”
General Charles A. Willoughby, MacArthur’s intelligence
chief in occupied Japan, instigated a yearlong investigation of subversive elements in his own headquarters and in Washington.
“There appears to be
a racial and geographical affinity for Communism and uncontrolled immigration has become a channel for subversion.”
Willoughby upon retirement became more explicit in identifying these as Jewish influences.
For example, he complained that an unprincipled Eisenhower had removed Patton “at the behest of Frankfurter, Bnai Brith
and the Jewish Conspirators.”
Military intelligence leaders also worked with Merwin
K. Hart, the president of the National Economic Council, who waged a relentless battle against Jews and the Anti-Defamation
League. Hart argued that left-wing Jews and Communists had worked closely together to work against American interests. Hart
further stated that Jewish-Communist power had forced the United States to make the tragic mistake of partitioning Palestine.
That decision cost America oil, alienated its natural Arab allies, and put displaced Palestinians in a dreadful plight.
Anti-Jewish feelings in the officer corps remained long
after World War II. For example, following a lecture at Duke Law School on October 10, 1974, General George S. Brown complained
that the power of the Israeli lobby was “so strong you wouldn’t believe it.” The Israelis, Brown stated,
“Don’t worry about the
Congress. We’ll take care of the Congress.” Now this is somebody from another country, but they can do it.
They own, you know, the banks in this country, the newspapers, you just look at where the Jewish money is
in this country.
Bendersky concludes the
last chapter of his book by writing:
can be established beyond doubt…is that into the late 1970s and beyond, certain retired officers pursued their crusade
to save America from a Jewish threat.”
These retired officers were saying similar things about
Jews as Adolf Hitler did when he was in power.
Joseph Bendersky wrote The “Jewish Threat” to show that anti-Semitism permeated the highest
ranks of the U.S. military throughout the last century. Much of the book’s extensive research and documentation, however, proves the disproportionate power of Jews in America
through their own words and actions. The U.S. military intelligence leaders were merely reacting to this disproportionate
power as loyal and patriotic Americans. The “Jewish Threat” thus contributes to the large body of evidence
indicating that Jews have taken control of the American government to the detriment of non-Jewish citizens.
The social-political transformation of America,
as Moseley described:
“In the modern world, their ultimate
goal is the “destruction of Christian civilization as we understand it in America today.”“
The Soviet Union Did NOT Defeat Germany in World War 2
Among the diploma-decorated dick-heads of western "academia,"
the "consensus" is that it
Soviet Union which defeated Germany in World War II -- with the contributions
of the United States and the United Kingdom being minimal. Here are a few typical headlines
demonstrating this typical ignorance of our esteemed "historians":
The Washington Post: (May 8, 2015): The Soviet Union Saved the World From Hitler
- The Independent (UK, May 10, 2015): Never Forget - The Soviets Won World II in Europe
- Newsweek: Defeat of Germany in World War II Was Possible Without U.S
Of course, from our perspective, with the crushing
defeats of both peaceful Germany and
humanity actually lost World War II -- and (((they))) won. That aside, we'd
like to clean up this duplicitous dung about "the Soviet Union won the war" --- and that
they did so almost single-handedly. To quote one misinformed writer,
the argument goes
something like this:
"The German Wehrmacht, which in a few
days overran France and drove the British off
the continent, was destroyed in Russia by the Red Army. The allied invasion of Normandy
encountered only a few under-strength German units deprived of fuel.
The German army and all available resources were on the Russian
Americans played a small role in the war against Hitler. Eisenhower
cleverly waited until the
Red Army had
defeated Hitler, and then invaded long after the tide had turned against Germany.
Today Washington claims credit for winning a war in which Washington’s role was
Professor Pointyhead and the Russian
myth-makers are talking nonsense.
Soviets absolutely could NOT have won without the US & UK.
Let's begin with:
"The German Wehrmacht, which in a few days overran France and drove
the British off the continent, was destroyed in Russia by the Red Army."
When the Germans launched
the preemptive Operation Barbarossa in June,1941, the
partly due to skill and tactics; and mostly due to surprise, overran the Red Army
just as easily and just as thoroughly as they had routed the British and French. The
numbers of Soviet prisoners taken and the sheer amount of war material destroyed or
confiscated were staggering. It was only the onset of the Russian winter
that stalled - not reversed - the rapid German advance into Russia.
If the German-Soviet
War were a boxing match, Round 1 (1941) was clearly dominated
by Germany. Round 2 (1942) could be considered a draw. It wasn't until Round 3 (1943)
that the Soviets could begin to claim that they had won a round (and even 1943 was
a very close round). As for 1944 & 1945, those years clearly belonged to Stalin.
But there are a few little
details that the ass-clowns of
academia seem to have forgotten.
Just to cite four:
1: FDR's massive, and I mean massive, infusion of Lend-Lease armaments
and other essential supplies to the depleted Soviet war machine
The diversion of German troops to Africa, Italy, France, the Low Countries, Scandinavia,
Greece and Yugoslavia - all necessary to block the Anglo-American
Alliance from advancing from fronts throughout Europe
3: FDR's manufactured war against Japan precluded
any possibility of anti-Communist Japan
helping its German ally
by way of an attack on the Soviet Union from the Far East.
4: The extensive treason of certain "elite"
Prussian generals who were deluded enough to
believe that he
Allies would somehow spare Germany of the destruction and
intended for it if Hitler could only be deposed or lose the war.
Just how massive was the free arsenal of state-of-the art
goodies which FDR shipped to
"Uncle Joe" via never-ending
Arctic convoys? Chew on these numbers, Professor Pointyhead:
- Trucks: 427,284
- Tanks and Combat Vehicles: 13,303
- Bombers: 3,000
- Anti-Aircraft Cannons: 8,000
- Ordnance Service Vehicles: 2,328
- Radar Systems: 400
Petroleum Products (gasoline and oil): 2,670,371 tons
- Field Radios: 40,000
- Foodstuffs (canned meats, sugar, flour, salt, etc.): 4,478,116 tons
- Locomotives & Railway cars: 13,000.
Tommy Guns (fully automatic machine guns): 135,000
Cutting Machine Tools: 400,000
An entire tire plant was
actually lifted bodily from the Ford Company's River Rouge Plant
and transferred to the USSR. There were also secondary Lend-Lease deliveries from the
UK to the USSR, most of which were just re-transfers of US aid given to the UK. More
essential goodies: aircraft engines, battleships, destroyers, submarines, mine sweepers,
sets, anti-submarine batteries, naval guns, rocket batteries,
gear-cutting machines, drilling
machines, cast-iron pipes, X-ray
tubes, electric furnaces and even
essential items such as socks,
boots, razors, clothes.
The complete list of Lend-Lease
aid, both for the Soviet military and the besieged home-front
population, was published by Major George Racey Jordan in 1952. It is indeed a jaw-dropper
(here). As conceded even by Russian military historians, the augmentation of Soviet fire-power
due to Lend Lease was as much as 30%. That's akin to a 150 pound street-fighter packing on
50 more pounds of muscle - American muscle! And it wasn't only about numbers; the
state-of-the-art quality of items such as radar systems, fighter aircraft and
tommy-guns was beyond what the Soviets could produce at the time.
A German reader from Canada informs us:
"I remember when a few years after World War II, an older friend of mine who was a
Panzer guy at the east front told me a story: When they got hold of stuff that the
Soldiers who had fled left behind , they discovered
US canned corned beef and other American
The Germans looked at each other and agreed: "This is the beginning of the end!"
Russia's Lifeline, by Albert Weeks, expands
upon Major Jordan's
the significance of US Lend Lease to the USSR.
The next myth:
"The allied invasion of Normandy encountered only a
few under-strength German units deprived of fuel."
Only "a few under-strength
German units, "eh? Over 425,000 Allied and German troops
killed, wounded or went missing during the Battle of Normandy and its aftermath.
The Allied casualties (killed or wounded) for D-Day alone (June 6, 1944) amounted
killed or wounded - a number that would have been
many times higher were it not for the
massive pre-invasion bombing
of Normandy and treason of certain German generals.
entire Battle of Normandy: 83,000 killed or wounded from 21st Army Group
& Canada), 126,000 from the US ground forces. The casualties of the German forces
during the Battle of Normandy are estimated at 200,000 killed or wounded.
We'll talk about that bit of bull-sugar
regarding "a few" German units again, momentarily,
as for the fuel shortages that the Germans had to overcome, the obvious insinuation
that the eastern front was depriving the Germans of fuel in the west is only half-true. Since
1940, the British Royal Air Force had been attacking facilities supplying Germany with
petroleum, oil, and lubrication products. The Americans later
joined the "Oil Campaign"
by bombing the Ploesti Oil
fields of Romania - Germany's main supplier. Refineries in Norway
were also attacked. Though unable to cripple Germany's supply to the extent they had hoped
for, the damage was certainly enough to contribute to the shortage that some seem
to think was all due to the Soviet campaign.
1. The US / UK Bombing of the Ploesti
Oil Fields (1943) // 2. From Scandinavia to
the Mediterranean Sea, the "Bomber Boys" of the US & UK wreaked havoc and devastation.
The errors continue:
"The German army and all available
resources were on the Russian front.
a small role in the war against Hitler"
Again, the Germans sustained MASSIVE casualties on the various fronts in which
they were compelled to engage the Americans. You see, there was this fellow named
General George Patton - you may have heard of him - whose genius and aggressive
tactics gave the German high command many nightmares. Not only did the Germans
have to contend with Patton, but America's presence meant that Germany's own great
General, Erwin Rommel, and millions of his tenacious fighting forces
were tied up in Africa
and later Italy and France. Had it not
been for Roosevelt's treasonous entry into the war,
would have been out of the picture as well and Rommel's armies would thus
have been fighting - and tipping the balance - against what would
have been an under-supplied Red Army on the eastern front.
Though not nearly as
bloody and as large as the Eastern front, to suggest that the Western
and Southern theatres were undefended American cake-walks displays an ignorance
about a subject which the academic ass-clowns should refrain from commenting
upon any further. Again, the numbers don't lie:
German Casualties sustained
fighting US / UK:
- North Africa / Italy: 50,000 Dead
and 194,000 MIA or POW, 160,000 Wounded
- France / Belgium: 107,000
Dead and 410,000 MIA or POW, 400,000 Wounded
Write off most of the MIA's
as dead, add in the numbers of German airmen and sailors
by the US & UK Air Force and Navy; plus those killed by US-trained and US-equipped
guerrilla Partisans (the "Resistance"); and German casualties in the West approach
comparable to those killed in America's Civil War. Yet
Fake Historians makes it
seem like there was only token opposition
in Western Europe. Nuts!
Oh, and by the way, dear pinko professors, need we remind "youse guys" of the utter
devastation wreaked upon German industry and German civilians by the "Bomber Boys"
of the US & UK Air Forces? Wave upon wave upon wave of Allied heavy bombers mercilessly
banged Germany throughout 1943 and 1944. 'Ya think' all of that urban destruction,
railroad-bombing, refinery bombing, factory bombing, deliberate dam-busting and straight-up
mass genocide might have hindered the German war effort, just a tad?
And then there were the legendary code-breakers of the UK and US. So much of
Germany planned was known in advance by the Anglo assassins,
and duly shared with
their Soviet buddies. This "open book"
was catastrophic for Germany (and Japan)
-- and they
didn't even realize it!
1. "A small role?" Vicious
and dirty Anglo-American attacks such as the infamous
fire-bombing of industrial Hamburg killed 40,000 Germans in one night.
2. The busting of German dams also took a heavy toll on Germany's infrastructure.
3. The findings of US & UK code-breakers
helped the Soviets greatly.
and "one more ting," as Lt. Colombo used to say. What these fools describe as
"a small role" in undefended Western Europe cost the lives of 250,000 Americans and
an even greater number of badly wounded. That equates to about FIVE Vietnam wars.
For their part, the British also lost about 250,000 military personnel in the European
of World War II. That's a total of about a half-million
dead Allied fighting men and at least
as many POW's; not a bad
take for "a few under-strength German units" which you
claim were "without resources."
"The German army and all available
resources were on the Russian front." --- Really???
Then how the heck did all of those MILLIONS of soldiers end up in Eisenhower's
notorious "death camps" (above)? Not to mention the Germans which
Eisenhower's dismay, set
free. Did they not get the memo saying that the war was only in Russia?
America's "small role" in
Europe? THREE NFL football stadiums full of dead
and many more stadiums full of injured and POW's. Was it German
housewives armed with broomsticks that inflicted such heavy casualties?
The British also lost about three stadiums
full of young fighting
men in the
war that Roberts believes the USSR won all by itself.
More errors to correct:
"Eisenhower cleverly waited until the Red Army had
and then invaded long after the tide
had turned against Germany."
Again, this opinion ignores, or is oblivious to, the reason that "the tide had turned,"
be attributed to FDR's Lend-Lease lifeline to the Soviets,
the dispersion of German forces
required to defend multiple
fronts, the vicious Partisan warfare being waged under the
of the US secret services, and the merciless terror bombing of German cities.
And as for this business of Eisenhower
"cleverly waiting," the delay had NOTHING to
'Ike's' desire to spare American lives. The reason for delaying the invasion of
Normandy until June 6, 1944, as well as for Ike's subsequent fuel restrictions and halt
orders which prevented Patton from taking Eastern Europe, was that FDR and the gang
of Communist Stalin-lovers around him were intending to gift Berlin and Eastern
Europe to Stalin all along. Had Eisenhower invaded in 1943, it would have been politically
impossible to gift Berlin and the east to "Uncle Joe"
- who FDR believed he could work
with at the time to build a
"New World Order". Yes, Uncle Joe wanted Berlin and he
wanted it bad. And FDR and Ike were only too happy to hand it too him.
Hence, the the "clever" delay.
Here it is from the then influential and well-connected
Time Magazine, 1942 - the Stalin "Man of the Year" issue:
Time Magazine: "There is also a
story in high places that, in keeping with the
tradition, credits Stalin with one other desire: permission from his
allies to raze Berlin, as a lesson in psychology to the Germans
and as a burnt offering to his own heroic people."
You see, contrary to the official delusion, Eisenhower's calculated
"delay" was not for the
purpose of minimizing US casualties
by letting the Soviets do the heavy lifting. Not at
was Stalin, with FDR's blessing, who wanted and who benefited from the cunning
stalling tactics. Even so, the great Patton with his lightning advances was still on track to
take Berlin; until Eisenhower cut off his fuel supply in 1944, and finally ordered Patton
halt at the Elbe River (near Berlin) in 1945. Have
a look at line # 3 of the New York Times
headline from "Roosevelt
Is Dead" issue of April 13, 1945, accompanied by an actual
quote from General Patton.
1. 3rd Line: "9th Crosses
Elbe, Nears Berlin" - Why did Eisenhower issue a stop order?
2. The soon-to-be assassinated Patton - in letter to his wife: "Berlin
gave me the blues. ...
It's said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran wereshot and those
who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead
of the Soviets) had I been allowed."
Though it cost them the lives of many
troops and civilians (but no where near the
ridiculous "20,000,000" claimed), the Soviets actually appreciated Eisenhower's
delaying tactics so much that they invited Ike to party atop Lenin's tomb,
General Zhukov and Stalin himself!
In gratitude for handing all of Eastern
to Stalin, "Ike" was awarded the "Order of Victory" from the Soviets.
"Washington’s role was small."
it is indeed true that the US and UK could not have won the war in Europe without
the diversion of 60-65% of Germany's might needed to fight the Soviet hordes in the
east; the same holds true the other way. You see, without the massive Lend Lease Lifeline;
without the bloody southern front (Africa, Italy, Yugoslavia, Greece); without
western front; (Normandy, Battle of the Bulge);
without the OSS (pre CIA) terrorist Partisans
France, Holland, Greece, Italy, Yugoslavia); without the US propping up of the UK;
without the relentless US / UK bombings and fire-bombings of German cities, railways,
factories, and oil refineries; and without the great Patton; Stalin's Evil Empire
would have been wiped out by the end of 1942, or 1943 at the latest - easily!
To put it in terms of
a wrestling analogy; Imagine three cheating wrestlers ganging-up on a
honorable wrestler. After a full hour in which the out-numbered grappler gives
"The Big 3" all they can handle, the lone fighter finally succumbs. Don't you think it would
be ridiculous, Professor Pointyhead, for any one of the "winning" wrestlers
to claim credit
for the victory? Russian President Putin has
no choice but to go along with the deeply entrenched
of the great Soviet victory; but for western academics, there
is simply no excuse for such a distortion of the historical record.
World War II in Europe was a 3 Super-Powers
Against 1 fight, with the 3 fighting
very dirty while using non-uniformed terrorist Partisans as a deadly "4th man" against the Germany.
*Italy should not be considered a factor in the war because Mussolini's blunders
in North Africa and Greece created
huge problems for Germany. Other lesser powers offset each other.
Should there be any lingering doubt as to the Soviet Union's need of and appreciation
for western material, following is some testimony from the ultimate source himself --
Just days before the Allied invasion of North
Africa (Operation Torch), Psycho Joe declared:
"It is often asked: But will there be a second front in Europe after all? Yes,
there will be;
sooner or later, there will be one. And
it will be not only because we need it, but above all
our Allies need it no less than we do. Our Allies cannot fail to realize that since
France has been put out of action, the absence of a second front against fascist Germany
may end badly for all freedom-loving countries, including the Allies themselves."
And then, just days after the Allied invasion of North Africa:
"The Soviet view of this campaign is that it represents an outstanding fact of major importance,
demonstrating the growing might of the armed forces of the Allies and opening the
prospect of the disintegration of the Italy-German coalition in the nearest future.
The campaign in Africa refutes once more
the skeptics who affirm that the Anglo-American
are not capable of organizing a serious military campaign. There can be no doubt
that only first-rate organizers could carry out such important military operations as the
successful landings in North Africa ... and the smashing of the Italy-German armies
in the Western Desert, effected with such mastery.
It is yet too soon to say to what extent
this campaign has been effective in relieving immediate
pressure on the Soviet Union, but it may confidently be said that the effect will not be a small
one, and that a certain relief in pressure on the Soviet Union will result in the
campaign radically changes the military and political situation in Europe
in favor of the Anglo-Soviet-American coalition. It undermines the prestige of Hitlerite
Germany as the leading force in the system of Axis
powers and demoralizes Hitler’s
allies in Europe.
It mobilizes the anti-Hitler forces of France and provides a basis for the
organization of an anti-Hitler French army. It creates conditions for putting Italy out of
commission and for isolating Hitlerite Germany. Finally, it creates the prerequisites
organization of a second front in Europe nearer
to Germany’s vital centres, which will
be of decisive importance for organizing victory over the Hitlerite tyranny." (here)
And in speeches dating back
to the desperate days and weeks following the initial German
invasion (Operation Barbarossa), Stalin referred to the importance of military aid from
"friends" in the West:
July, 1941: "The historic utterance of the British Prime Minister, Mr. Churchill,
to the Soviet Union, and the declaration
of the United States Government signifying readiness
to render aid to our country, which can only evoke a feeling of gratitude in the hearts of the peoples
of the Soviet Union." (here)
And in a telegram to FDR, dated November 4, 1941:
"Your decision, Mr President, to grant the Soviet Union an
interest-free loan to the value
to meet deliveries of munitions and raw materials to the Soviet Union
is accepted by the Soviet Government with heartfelt gratitude as vital aid to the
Soviet Union in its tremendous and onerous struggle against our common
enemy — bloody Hitlerism." (here)
And another telegram to FDR, sent in February of 1942:
"I have received your message about U.S. arms deliveries in January and February.
I stress that it is now, when the peoples of the Soviet
Union and their Army are
bending their energies to
throw the Hitler troops back by a tenacious offensive, that
U.S. deliveries, including tanks and aircraft, are essential for our common cause and our
further success." (here)
Mr President, to grant the Government of the U.S.S.R. another $1,000,000,000
under the Lend-Lease Act on the same terms as the first $1,000,000,000,
is accepted by the Soviet Government with sincere gratitude." (here)
And also in 1942:
"As regards the international connections of our Motherland, .... Great Britain and the
United States of America, with which we are bound by ties of friendship and alliance,
and who are rendering our country ever-increasing military
assistance against the German-fascist invaders." (here)
Tell it, Psycho Joe. Tell it!
And there are many other such telegrams and speeches in which Stalin -- in almost
deferential tones -- gushed with gratitude to FDR for all the planes, tanks, trucks and
equipment that were being shipped to the the Soviet Union. And so, thank you, Mr. Stalin
(you vile murderous monster) for setting the record straight about just how much
"second front" and the "Lend Lease"
aid meant to the survival of your wicked regime.
Headline from UK press -- November,
1941 -- Even BEFORE the U.S. joined the war,
was pleading for a "second front." Note the story titled with a quote from
FDR, " 'We join in world defence' -- Roosevelt."
This was one month BEFORE the
attack on Pearl Harbor which FDR and the Reds / Globalists all around
him provoked, and needed to happen.
1. Stalin's own speeches and telegrams to FDR confirm that he needed the help of
the United States. // 2. Daily Mirror, 1941, Front Page: Stalin demands a
in Europe. He got much need relief with the 1942 Allied invasion of
Africa and the threat of an Allied landing in northern France -- which, although D-Day
was not until 1944 -- drew vital German manpower and material away from the
front. // 3. Communist Party
USA poster demands "second front." // 3. Statue in Alaska
commemorates the Lend Lease routes through which enormous amounts
of military aid was shipped from the USA to the Soviet Union.
Meet the Man Who Started World
By MIKE KING
Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly
The ultimate culprits behind the disaster of World
War II were the high-level masters of the New World Order crime gang (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Sulzberger,
Baruch et al), and their skilled operational henchmen of the political world (FDR, Churchill, Stalin et al).
By the way, this is the same self-perpetuating crime syndicate that has, in recent years, been agitating for confrontation
against Russia and China. Same game, new players, long story.
But the one thing this dirty gang could never have accomplished by themselves was to trigger the actual
war. As even the most geographically illiterate Boobus Americanus or Boobus Europithicus should know,
neither the US, nor the USSR, and nor the UK shared a common border from which to make mayhem against Hitler's Germany.
does share a border with Germany, but when Hitler permanently renounced any claims to the disputed Alsace-Lorraine region
in 1935, a possible flash-point between the two rivals was diffused forever.
Another potential trigger was diffused in 1938 when the Munich
Agreement - since dubbed by propagandists and ignoramus parrots alike as "Neville Chamberlain's appeasement"
- fairly settled the German-Czech dispute to the mutual benefit of Czechs, Slovaks and Germans.
Nor was Germany bound
to any dangerous entangling alliances, as it had been prior to World War I when the Reich was committed to fight alongside
Austria-Hungary after the Russians and French began mobilizing against that nation.
Hitler's skillful and honest diplomacy
resolved the Alsace-Lorraine dispute to France's favor, and the Sudetenland problem to the benefit of all parties. Left:
with UK's Neville Chamberlain, Right: with Daladier of France. Unfortunately,neither Daladier nor Chamberlain would be strong
enough to hold back the continued pressure from the warmongering factions around and above them.
In November of 1938, the U.S. mid-term Congressional elections
dealt a crushing blow to Franklin Demono Roosevelt's Democrat Party. With America still reeling from the
decade-long Great Depression, absent some foreign "crisis", it appeared that the failed two-term President would
not be able to seek a third term (He ultimately held office until his death in 1945). It should be noted that at
this hard time in American history, prosperous Germany was enjoying full employment, a strong currency, the Autobahn, the
Volkswagen, and a happy reconciliation between labor and the entrepreneurial class. But I digress.
Even the claims of Jewish persecution in Germany were no longer valid. Though the dominant
Jewish elite had in large measure been stripped of high positions in finance, press, government, law and academia, the truth
was, the 330,000 Jews who remained in Hitler's Germany were unmolested and actually quite prosperous. Indeed, after anti-Jewish
riots broke out following the 1938 Paris murder of a German diplomat by a deranged Polish Jew, it was Hitler himself who,
via Josef Goebbels, immediately issued an Emergency Order for the anti-Jewish violence (since exaggerated
in scope) to cease.
And so, by 1939, the New World Order crime
syndicate and the British & French chauvinists had nearly run out of all options and all propaganda pretexts for instigating
another war against peaceful and prosperous Germany, as they had done in 1914. The last hopes for starting the war to re-enslave
Germany rested on the shoulders of one man, and one man only. His name was Edward Rydz-Smigly -- the criminal
fool who started World War II. As is to be expected, his name is virtually unknown outside of Poland. It's high-time this
dirty, rotten, ego-maniacal scoundrel gets the posthumous "credit" he so richly deserves.
After Germany was essentially tricked into laying down
her arms and surrendering during World War I, its west Prussian territory was carved out, given to the new state of Poland,
and, for the most part, "ethnically cleansed" of Germans. The German port city of Danzig was declared a "free
city" and forbidden from rejoining Germany. East Prussia remained part of Germany but was left isolated from the mainland.
This illogical and immoral configuration, and the anti-German abuses which were to take place within the "Polish Corridor",
would serve as the perfect trip-wire for setting off a new war against Germany.
A Tale of Two Marshals
Born and known as Edward
Rydz, the young army commander served in the Polish legions of Austro-Hungarian Empire during World War I. He later
became one of the leaders of a Polish independence movement that sought to establish a Polish state carved from the Polish
majority areas of Austria-Hungary and Russia. Rydz, by appointment of Marshal Jozef Pilsudski, became commander
of the Polish Military Organization and adopted the 'nom de guerre' of "Smigly" (Fast or Agile). He later
added 'Smigly' as an integral part to his surname, which tells us something about his ego. His self-promoting renaming is
similar to that of Loseb Jugashvili, who later took the name "Stalin" - Man of
Pilsudski (l) and Smigly-Rydz fought
for Polish statehood.
As a Brigadier, Smigly commanded armies during the Polish-Soviet War which followed World War I. The
treaty which ended that war, the Peace of Riga, divided the disputed territories between the relatively new state of Poland
and the new Soviet Union (fka Russian Empire).
Marshal Pilsudski would go on to become Poland's head of State until his death in 1935.
It is important to note that Hitler and Pilsudski were on good terms. Pilsudski had actually congratulated Hitler on winning
the 1933 elections, and the German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact was signed just 10 months after Hitler came to power. According
to the Pact, both countries pledged to resolve their problems through bilateral negotiations and to forgo armed conflict.
Just before his death,
Pilsudski re-emphasized that Poland should maintain neutral relations with Germany. The death of Pilsudki proved to be a
great loss for Germany - a fact which Hitler himself expressed during the closing days of World War II.
1. Hitler attends a Berlin Memorial Service
held in honor of Pilsudski, whom he respected greatly.
2. Pilsudski and his Foreign Minister Beck (left) make peace with German Minister for Propaganda &
Public Enlightenment, Joseph Goebbels, and German Ambassador to Poland, von Moltke.
A Dictatorship Without a Dictator
Pilsudski's death, Rydz-Smigly became General Inspector of the Armed Forces. From that point on, Smigly was rapidly elevated.
In 1936, he was awarded the title of "Second Man in the State after the President", by the Polish prime minister.
Later that year, he was promoted to the rank of Marshal of Poland. Smigly's carefully crafted image as Pilsudski's anointed
successor alienated many of Pilsudski's supporters, who saw him as a shameless self-promoter.
The period of Smigly's rule, 1935–39, was often referred to as "a dictatorship without a dictator".
But he lacked the moral authority of the beloved Pilsudski and many Poles were divided over their new de-facto dictator;
with more than a few hating him outright. The Smigly regime became increasingly authoritarian. This was illustrated by the
creation of the Ozon movement, whose objective was to build a popular mass movement that would transform the tin-pot dictator
into "Poland's second great leader" (after Pilsudski himself). Several of Poland's senior politicians
made a point of distancing themselves from this phony "grass-roots" cult movement.
1 & 2. Smigly-Rydz: always decorated
like a Christmas tree and talking big. // 3. The self-glorifying egomaniac poses next to a bust of French Emperor Napoleon
In addition to being
authoritarian, and not universally popular among his own people, the pompous Marshal had grandiose delusions of restoring
the old Polish Empire of 1569-1795, in territories which had long since been devoid of Polish inhabitants (Baltic States,
Ukraine, Belarus, Czechoslovakia and Prussian Germany). To that end, Smigly's gang embarked on a campaign of aggressive
intimidation and forced annexation.
1 & 2. Dreams of restoring Poland's
long gone Empire danced in 'Emperor' Smigly's mind. // 3. Nationalist painting, from months before the war started, depicts
the Mad Marshal riding triumphantly through the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin as he tramples upon German flags.
Smigly-Rydz Strong-Arms Lithuania & Czechoslovakia
In March of 1938, Smigly issued an ultimatum to the tiny Baltic State of Lithuania. Lithuania
had refused to have any diplomatic relations with Poland after 1920, protesting the annexation of the Vilnius Region by
the new Polish state. The ultimatum demanded that Lithuania unconditionally agree to establish diplomatic ties with Poland
within 48 hours, and that the terms be finalized within two weeks. The establishment of diplomatic relations would mean
a renunciation of Lithuanian claims to the region containing its historic capital, Vilnius.
Tiny Lithuania, preferring peace to
war, accepted bully-boy Smigly's ultimatum and conditions. Had Lithuania stood firm, it's quite possible that Stalin would
have used the ensuing war as pretext to take the Baltic States (which he eventually did in 1940) and start the 2nd Polish-Soviet
war. Such was the recklessness of Marshal Smigly.
Many in the "democratic" West, including, ironically, the anti-German New York
Times, expressed dismay over Poland's militaristic bullying of Lithuania; a development so dangerous that it caused jitters
among Wall Street investors. (here) But in the end, it was generally understood that Poland would be needed for bigger things, so the West "held
its nose" and tolerated Smigly's antics.
Later that same year, Smigly
made a similar bold move against the Czech government when he took advantage of the Sudetenland Crisis to demand a portion
of Zaolzie and some other smaller areas. The Czechs were powerless to stop the forced annexations. Again, the "democratic"
West shook its head in dismay, but held its tongue.
1. Lithuania and Czechoslovakia were
both strong-armed by 'Emperor' Smigly. // 2. Uninvited, Polish tanks roll into annexed Zaolzie. A few Polish flags are visible,
but the people don't seem too excited.
Smigly the Tyrant Eyes Danzig
addition to the expansionist foreign policy, the Polish military junta was infamous for suppressing ethnic minorities living
within its new borders. Indeed, during the 20-year history of the League of Nations, literally hundreds of formal complaints
were submitted by German and other ethnic minorities trapped in the stolen lands now controlled by ultra-Nationalist Poland.
Smigly was not content with the possession
and ethnic cleansing of stolen western Prussia. He also wanted control over the beautiful "free city" of German
Danzig (today known as Gdansk, Poland) and eventually all of eastern Prussia too.
In 1939, supported from "behind the scenes" by elements in the UK, France, and
the US (yes, Roosevelt was deeply involved!), Smigly was encouraged to ignore Hitler's sincere and generous proposals for
resolving the bizarre and hated partition of Prussia that had caused tension ever since the end of World War I. At one
point, Hitler had even agreed to give up claims to western Prussia in exchange for the return of Danzig and a 1-mile wide
highway - railway passage linking Germany to eastern Prussia.
resolve, overestimating Poland's power, and foolishly trusting in the western intriguers who were manipulating his bloated
imperialistic ego, Smigly ignored Hitler's offers and ratcheted up the abuse of Germans trapped in western Prussia and Danzig.
The suffering of the Prussian Germans is not "Nazi propaganda." It is historical fact which the West's "court
historians" have purposely edited out of their "Orwellianized" history books.
that the western powers were truly behind him, the cowardly Smigly 'stood down' and allowed predominantly Jewish-Bolshevik
terror gangs to attack innocent Germans; both within "Prussian Poland" and inside of German border towns as well.
These gangs of Red "partisans", as well as other Polish ultra-nationalists, had been salivating at the prospect
of triggering a Western "holy war" against Germany ever since 1933.
The torture-mutilation-massacre at Bromberg
occurred just 2 days after the liberating Germans arrived in western Prussia. The brutality of the mass killing gives an
indication of the type of abuse that innocent Germans, trapped in Poland, had been suffering while Smigly "looked the
coveted the "free city" of Danzig (98% German) and wished to eventually annex all of eastern Prussia.
Step by step Smigly plotted the restoration of an empire that was long gone -- an Empire which even his own people didn't
want. A man blinded by such ambition was easy pickings for the British -- those undisputed historical masters of foreign
intrigue - and also for the cunning Roosevelt and the Jewish operatives that surrounded him.
By August of 1939, Germany had exhausted
all efforts to reason with Smigly's gang. Earlier that year, the British and French had even urged Smigly to allow the Soviet
Army to march westward, in the event that war should break out with Germany. Smigly refused, stating that: "there is
no guarantee that the Soviets will really take active part in the war; furthermore, once having entered Polish territory,
they will never leave it".
On September 1, 1939, after all German attempts
to reason with Poland, France and Britain had failed, and after the Polish military, at the urging of Britain, went on full
mobilization, the Germans invaded Poland and liberated Danzig. On September 7, along with most of the government, Smigly
ran from Warsaw as it came under attack. The immediate counter-attack promised by Poland's French and British "allies"
Unbeknownst to the blinded idiot Smigly, the Allies had no such plans and fully expected not only the
fall of Poland, but the entry of Stalin's hordes. The Allies only interest was to have an excuse to declare war upon Germany,
and then wait for Stalin to attack Germany from the east, necessarily having to pass through Poland. Stalin was indeed ready
to pounce on a distracted Poland, but his move against Germany was to be on his time-table, not that of the Allies.
The Allies continued
to ignore Hitler's impassioned pleas for peace and would spend the next eight months plotting Scandinavian-based maneuvers
and deploying a massive mechanized fighting force in northern France, in anticipation of invading Germany via Belgium and
Holland, sometime in the spring of 1940.
The rest, as they say, is history.
Once Rydz-Smigly had given Britain and
France the phony pretext needed to declare war against Germany, he was given his 15 minutes of fame and then "thrown
under the bus."
The Allies Abandon Smigly; Stalin Finishes Poland
pipe-dream of a new Polish Empire was further crippled when the opportunistic Stalin attacked Poland from the east on September
17th; an invasion which Britain & France, in spite of their "defense guarantees" to Poland, said nothing about!
Having picked a fight with one superpower, Germany; and thus exposing Poland to invasion from another, the Soviet Union;
Smigly-Rydz sealed his county's doom. His criminal stupidity enabled the brutal butchers of the Soviet NKVD to round up
and execute 10,000 of his Polish Army officers at Katyn Forest.
Had Smigly followed the late Marshal
Pilsudski's path and remained on friendly terms with Germany, the Soviet invasion and the Katyn Forest massacre of his officer
corps would never have happened.
than choosing an honorable punishment for the disastrous folly which he drove Poland into - such as suicide or at least
surrendering to the humane Germans - the coward Smigly fled to Romania. Like a true narcissist egomaniac, he deflected any
and all blame for the disaster that he and he alone engineered, later stating from his Romanian hideout:
"Cost of construction of modest fortifications along our western border was equivalent
to 18-month budget of Poland, and at the same time, we were working on fortifications in the East. A modest armament plan
was up to 5 billion zlotys. What was I supposed to do? I am not an economist.
We began partial mobilization in the spring 1939. The nation hated it, more than 1000
Silesians deserted to Germany. We were unable to keep Poland mobilized for so long, we could not afford it."
Pathetic! Smigly admitted
that Poland was ill-equipped for war; that the nation itself did not want war; that the Soviets posed a threat from the East;
and that Poland could not afford the cost of war. And yet, he purposely pissed in Hitler's face and eagerly rushed head-long
into war anyway!
In defense of the accusation of cowardice in regard to his flight, Smigly issued more prideful excuses:
"They say that
I am a coward. I had three options: to surrender, to kill myself, and to be captured. It was impossible to fight, as I had
only half a company of soldiers with me. To kill myself meant failure."
"To kill myself meant failure",
eh Smigly? That would be like the captain of the Titanic abandoning the ship that he helped to carelessly destroy, sneaking
onto one of the limited lifeboats, and later declaring, "To have stayed on the ship would have meant failure."
As it went, Captain Smith stayed on the Titanic and is believed to have shot himself as the ship went down.
In light of what Smigly's
folly enabled the Soviet butchers to do to his officers at Katyn Forest, the pain of remorse alone should have driven him
to suicide; but that's assuming Smigly was any kind of a decent or honorable man. Clearly, he was not. Smigly-Rydz would
return to Poland in 1941 to work with the Polish underground. He was said to have died of "heart failure" just
a few weeks later -- or did some of his fellow Poles repay him for his folly and cowardice?
Hitler Exposes Smigly
During his speech to liberated Danzig in 1939, Hitler addressed Smigly's folly:
"No power on
earth would have borne this condition as long as Germany. I do not know what England would have said about a similar peace
solution (Versailles) at its expense or how America or France would have accepted it. I attempted to find a solution - a
tolerable solution - even for this problem. I submitted this attempt to the Polish rulers in the form of verbal proposals.
You know these proposals. They were more than moderate. I do not know what mental condition the Polish Government was in
when it refused these proposals."
In that same speech, Hitler goes on to speak of Smigly's cowardice:
Marshal (Smigly), who miserably deserted his armies, said that he would hack the German Army to pieces."
And of his cruelty:
began for our German nationals. Tens of thousands were dragged off, mistreated, and murdered in the vilest fashion. Sadistic
beasts gave vent to their perverse instincts, and this pious democratic world watched without blinking an eye."
And of Smigly's willful
"I have often asked myself: Who can have so blinded Poland? Does anyone really believe that the
German nation will permanently stand that from such a ridiculous State? Does anyone seriously believe that?"
decorated and twice-wounded war hero Hitler had this slippery, sleazy, sniveling, self-promoting Smigly clown all figured
1- Hitler struts through the streets
of Danzig while Smigly hides in Romania. (The Fuhrer is so 'bad-ass', in a good way, isn't he?) 2- The joyous crowds
of Danzig greet their liberator.
wasn't merely the fact that Marshal Rydz-Smigly was a tyrannical, imperialist, warmongering weasel that should have made
his name infamous. Compounding all of these vices was his abject stupidity. All "Polish jokes" aside, did Smiggy
actually believe that Poland could defeat Germany? Really? Evidently so.
Did the Smigster not suspect, that with his hands full fighting
Germany, the bestial Stalin might capitalize on the situation and invade from the east? Evidently not.
Did His Royal Smigness
not suspect that his British, French, and America "allies" were just using Poland to pick a fight with Germany,
only to throw her out like a used-up lemon rind afterwards? Was Smigly not aware of how the Allies seduced the Russian Tsar
to fight with them during World War I, only to refuse him asylum when he was overthrown? The Bolsheviks then captured and
murdered the Tsar and his entire family.
Was Smigly not aware of how the British, during World War I, encouraged the Arabs to rise
up against the Ottoman Turkish Empire, only to renege on promises made to them and then steal Palestine as well?
Ironically, what Smigly
was not able to see was, again, very clear to Hitler. In that same Danzig speech, Hitler spoke about how Poland had been
played for chumps:
"For these men (British warmongers) Poland, too, was only a means to an end. Because today it is
being declared quite calmly that Poland was not the primary thing, but that the German regime is. I always warned against
these men. I pointed out the danger that in a certain country such men could rise and unmolested preach the necessity of
war - Herren Churchill, Eden, Duff-Cooper, etc.
The circumstances surrounding the outbreak of this unnecessary war haunted Hitler until
his dying day. Hours before his suicide, Hitler dictated his final political testament; in which he stated:
"It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was
desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish
Three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I again proposed to the British ambassador
in Berlin a solution to the German-Polish problem—similar to that in the case of the Saar district, under international
control. This offer also cannot be denied. It was only rejected because the leading circles in English politics wanted the
war, partly on account of the business hoped for and partly under influence of propaganda organized by international Jewry."
The modern "educated" mind, so twisted by 75 years
of false propaganda, may find it difficult, if not impossible, to even begin to process such a claim. And yet, an objective
analysis of the events of 1939 leads us to the inescapable conclusion that the man was telling the truth!
Hitler saw how the Allies were playing
Smigly-Rydz for a chump; and spoke publicly about it months before the war had even started. Wasn't Smigly listening?
Will History Repeat?
imperial folly, criminal negligence, and astonishing stupidity not only doomed Poland, but the world as well. That's what
happens when a man is blinded by his ego and his ambitions. Given these true facts about the horrible historical record
of the mad Marshal, one would think that, in spite of the conventional misunderstanding of World War II, the Poles would
universally hold his memory in contempt. But that is not the case. Marshal Edward Rydz Smigly Park is a large tree-covered
public park in Warsaw that honors the memory of the man who not only started World War II at the behest of his western manipulators,
but doomed his nation to Soviet conquest, mass killings, and nearly 50 years of Communism.
Honoring Smigly? Really? Come on Poland!
Are you flippin' serious?
would also think that Poland learned a valuable historical lesson about 'messin' with super-powers. And yet, the current
Polish government, much to the dismay of more than a few Poles, is taking the lead in provoking Putin's Russia on behalf
of the western Globalists!
How does the old adage go? "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it”.
1. Brainwashed Poles protest Putin,
who, like Hitler, has never threatened them in any way. // 2. Polish President Komorowski tried to play the modern day role
of Smigly to Obama's Roosevelt.
Click on this text to visit the World War 2 Truth website
"The Truth is Hate to Those Who Hate the Truth"
This article is a classic by author Lasha Darkmoon. You can find the
here, as well as her other articles. Her piece clearly outlines that the
particularly in Berlin, was not some "silver age" for
Germany as Jews like to tell
us, but rather a cruel, and calculated sick …
Continue reading The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany
Here is another great article by James L. Miller, this time on the Holocaust.
article can be found here. I added some extra videos and removed all
the dead links
to youtube, except for the Netanyahoo one. Amazing that youtube's
censorship is so one-sided!
Also, the books I recommended down …
Continue reading What Was The Holocaust… What Actually Happened?
The following article is massive! It clearly argues the opposite of what
brainwashed to believe about Hitler and Nazi Germany (they were rabid r
acists while the Allies
were much more inclusive). Surprisingly, or not so surprisingly
the opposite is of course
true. The SS for example, was a multi-national force of many …
Continue reading Adolf Hitler’s Army of Mankind Vs. Allied Racial Hypocrisy
Here is an original news article published in Australia shortly after the
Notice the use of the term Holocaust to describe the destruction
and devastation. The
Jewish hijacking of the term is one more example of the projection
of their own evil on to
the Germans. The article mentions the massive …
Continue reading Holocaust in Dresden: City Wiped Off the Map
Was Systematically Gassing Lice Infested Clothing To Save Lives
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
…Germany built highly sophisticated and expensive disinfestation facilities at
Auschwitz/Birkenau to kill lice and save inmate lives. By one estimate, the SS at
Auschwitz spent almost $1 billion in today’s values to bring the typhus epidemics
raging there under control. An enormous amount of information exists concerning
delousing facilities, but no similar information exists
regarding the alleged homicidal
gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
The Auschwitz camp employed a number of delousing stations, which used steam and
to kill lice in prisoner clothing. This picture shows autoclave number 2, seen
the “dirty” clothing side. Infected clothing was put on hangers attached to a trolley
and pushed inside the chamber. Dirty clothes were put on hangers on a trolley which was
pushed into the chamber on two short rails. The disinfection stations were constructed…
View original post 3,737 more words
What does the Russian Revolution have to do with World War II?
of all, it was not a revolution but rather a coup de' etat planned
and executed by Jewish bankers
and terrorists. Everyone in Europe was horrified
by what was occurring in Russia, and
feared it would spread. Attempts were …
Continue reading Jewish-Bolshevik Destruction of Christianity in Russia
Veteran's Today, author, Jonas Alexis The Holocaust Industry will never
cease to attract people
who want to make a name for themselves. It is quite obvious by
now that those people who want
to resurrect a rotten corpse, a stench in the nostril of
virtually every person with an ounce
of common sense. …
Continue reading Another Holocaust Fabrication on the Block
The following is a book review of a well-researched but little know
book called: Desperate
Deception: British Covert Operations in the United States,
1939-1944, which investigates
the large, coordinated plan to infiltrate the United States
on multiple levels in order to
destroy the America First "isolationist" movement and
manipulate the U.S. government
and its citizens …
Continue reading Desperate Deception:
British Covert Operations in the United States, 1939-44
The Ethnic European
REAL HISTORY survives on book royalties donated by author
Michael Walsh and supporters of real history.
AIMS: To replace victor’s spin with
real history, to enlighten, inspire and to educate,
with your help to
share our features as widely as possible.
The meme created
by country music star Robert Edwards puts the D-Day Landing
into perspective free of the victors spin. The graphic depicts a scene from the Normandy Landings.
The Allied invasion
of Europe began at 6 am on the 6th day of the 6th month (1944).
Much has been made of the timing
of the landings translating into 666 as being the mark of Satan.
prominent Jew Harold Wallace Rosenthal,
before he was assassinated by MOSSAD,
reminded Jews everywhere: ‘Most Jews do not like to
admit it but our
god is Lucifer and we are his Chosen People’.
Robert Lloyd meme’s…
View original post 581 more words
article was written by Dwight D. Murphey, after he reviewed the book:
After the Reich: The Brutal
History of the Allied Occupation by Giles MacDonogh.
After reviewing the book, he was
so moved by the research of the author that he
decided to investigate further. The following
is his review, and own insights …
Continue reading Revisiting the “Good War’s”
Aftermath: Emerging Truth in an Ocean of Myth
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
article expands on the introductory review of
The “Jewish Threat” by Joseph W. Bendersky.
During the 1920s, File 245 contained letters between officers, secret agents,
state secretaries, and embassies abroad exchanging the latest information on Jews…
much more concern was displayed toward Jewish refugees and immigration to the
States. Certain prominent American Jews, including Supreme Court Justice
D. Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, and Rabbi Stephen Wise, were considered
important to warrant individual scrutiny. Most incredible, though, were lengthy,
documented reports such as “The Power and Aims of International Jewry.”
The “Jewish Threat” Book Review
The “Jewish Threat”: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army by American historian
Joseph W. Bendersky is a well-researched book that documents that many people
in American military intelligence believed in an international Jewish conspiracy to take
over the world. In fact, many officers in the Military Intelligence Division (MID) were saying…
View original post 2,948 more words
After writing his revisionist bestseller Debating the Holocaust back
Dr. Thomas Dalton began investigating the issue of Jewish power and influence in
western society, resulting in a series of two articles on "The Jewish Hand in the World Wars".
He has now turned these essays into a book so that he can reach out to an …
Continue reading The Jewish Hand In the World Wars
In a painting by a German artist of the time, innocent civilians and war
refugees get turned
to toast in Dresden by the allied firestorm bombing in February, 1945
when the war was pretty
much over. About 130,000 people died horribly for absolutely no reason.
Up to a million German
civilians might have …
Continue reading What They Did to Nazi Germany was Simply Horrible
European REAL HISTORY survives on book royalties donated by Michael Walsh
and supporters of real history. OUR AIMS: To replace victor’s spin with real history,
to enlighten, inspire and to educate, with your help to share our features as widely as possible.
One truck missing from
the Moscow Victory Day jamboree on May 9 was the American
Studebaker US6 2.5-ton Utility Truck 1941 and other vehicles that poured
from the maker’s production lines.
In July 1943, the Red Army planned a major offensive
against the Germans grouped at Kursk.
problem for Soviet General Georgy Zhukov in the upcoming operation would be
supply lines. There would be difficulty in quickly moving infantry and field guns to advantageous
positions along a changing front.
The answer to Zhukov’s problems
was thousands of U.S. Studebakers to resupply
troops and armament, move artillery and crews, and haul infantry. …
View original post 982 more words
Very few people know detail of Joseph Stalin’s notorious Torch-Man Order. As a consequence
people little realize that images depicting German atrocities are falsified. Filmed atrocities
were the responsibility not of the Reich, but of England and America’s Soviet allies.
There can be no excuse for using images of one’s own …
Continue reading Germans Blamed for Allied Crimes: Stalin’s Torch-Man Order
The Ethnic European
REAL HISTORY survives on book royalties donated by
Michael Walsh and supporters
of real history. OUR AIMS: To replace victor’s spin
with real history,
to enlighten, inspire and to educate,
with your help to share our features
as widely as possible.
Walsh historian says, “Pay attention not to what corporate TV shows you but
what they are afraid to show you”. Despite access to hundreds of TV channels and
tens of thousands of programmes documenting the Third Reich and WWII,
sees sub-titled repeats of the German President-Chancellor’s
speeches because time
has proved conclusively Adolf
Hitler right time after time.
During a keynote broadcast address to a Nuremberg NSDAP rally, Adolf Hitler clearly
laid out his reasons for Germany opposing international Bolshevism,
now known as globalism.
“We do not deny the grave concern which we feel
at the thought of other nations becoming a victim…
View original post 1,173 more words
Today there is a lot of talk about fighting Communism. The only problem is that the
American people are not aware of who are the true founders and promoters of Communism.
you had to find a Communist, where would you look? Would you recognize a
Communist if you saw
one? What …
Continue reading Communism is Judaism, Period
This is the speech that got Lindbergh
in big trouble with the Jews because he
directly states they were responsible for trying to
get the U.S. into World War 2.
The following article was featured as the afterward in the book,
WAR, WAR, WAR! by Cinncinatus.
This is an excellent book on the America First movement,
Jewish intrigue, and the Roosevelt
administration's responsibility for bringing the U.S.
into World War II. The book was
published BEFORE the official U.S. entry into war,
and … Continue reading How The Jews Forced America Into World War II
The Holocaust — a conspiracy to commit a
massive criminal fraud against the entire white world
Source: The Holocaust -- a conspiracy to commit a massive criminal fraud against the entire white world
Treblinka, Belzec & Sobibor in Poland? Can The Allies Version Be Trusted?
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
What Happened to Jews
Not Gassed in the Aktion Reinhardt Camps?
historians state that all Jews sent to the Aktion Reinhardt camps of
Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor
in Poland were exterminated. It is claimed that a handful
of strong young Jews were temporarily
spared to keep the camps running. All other Jews
sent to the Aktion Reinhardt camps are claimed
to have been
immediately gassed upon arrival without registration.
In his book Holocaust, historian Peter Longerich states that 1,274,166
Jews had been killed
in the Aktion Reinhardt camps by the end of 1942. Longerich bases his statement
fact that the Höfle telegram shows that this many Jews had been sent by then to
Aktion Reinhardt camps. Longerich assumes that every
to the Aktion Reinhardt camps was murdered.
I have written an article explaining why the
Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps…
View original post 1,570 more words
The following chapter was taken from the excellent book: The Tyranny
of the Federal Reserve.
I am not familiar with the author, Brian O'Brien, a possible
a pen name, but it is a great overview
of the federal reserve, banking,
and the disastrous affects it has created in our society.
Although the author …
Continue reading The Tyranny of World War II
LACKING SPONSORS and donors we survive on book royalties donated by Michael Walsh.
AIMS: Defence of equality and rights for ethnic-Europeans,
to end anti-White racism, hate,
discrimination. Show your support by purchasing books, donating and sharing stories.
“The sacking of Germany after her unconditional surrender
will go down in
history as one of the most monstrous
acts of modern times. Its excess
and its magnitude defy condemnation.”
F. Keeling. Institute of American Economics.
By late 1944, the leadership of the Reich, soon to be overwhelmed by the combined
armies of the Soviet, British and American Empires realised that from
as early as
February 1943 the Soviets had established
the Trophy Brigades approved by
Washington DC and Downing
The purpose of the Trophy Brigades was to identify and to manage German plunder and
to transport to the Soviet Union everything from domestic goods, the entire contents…
View original post 1,055 more words
Allied Atrocities Come To Light In One Of The Most Shocking Books Ever Written
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
It was the most deadly and destructive war in human history. Millions were killed,
billions in property was destroyed, ancient cultures were reduced to
rubble–World War II was truly man’s greatest cataclysm. Thousands of books,
movies and documentary films have been devoted to the war. There has
never been such a terrible retelling of the story, however, as one will find
a chilling “you-are-there” style, the author places the reader at the scene, in the moment.
Throughout this book readers will see what Allied airman saw as they rained
death on German cities; or the reader will experience
what those below experienced
as they sat trembling in their
bomb shelters awaiting that very same death from above.
The reader will view up close the horrors of the Eastern Front during the last
months of fighting and through the mud, blood and madness of combat they may…
View original post 1,416 more words
The Testimony of Captain Hermann Sommer
A number of troop companies reported to the fortress commander (at Königsberg) the
discovery of several mounds of corpses situated quite close to one another.
General Lasch, ordered a commission to investigate these discoveries.
The commission reported
that many similar piles of bodies were strewn throughout
the area; but in two cases …
Continue reading The Crucifiction of German Women:
The Testimony of Captain Hermann Sommer
we are to be able to prevent and work
against war in the
future, we must have a better
understanding of the wars
of the past, especially
those most destructive wars known
as world wars.
We need to recognize the forces and
that work to cause wars, expose them and
When we read that books
are banned, we recall the words of Voltaire:
‘To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.’
This book, The Bad War: The Truth Never Taught About World
War 2, by M.S. King,
(copyright 2015, 2nd edition 2017,
308 pages) was banned on Amazon last March (2017).*
There can be no denying that in Western historiography, there is an entrenched bias against
Germany and Germans. This bias is so strong that one version of
history about the 1930s and 1940s is enforced in…
View original post 1,639 more words
The alleged Holocaust is the most over publicized non-historical event in history!
real holocausts like the millions who perished in the Soviet Gulag System
(see Gulag Archipelago
by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn) are never mentioned.
Once you investigate the massive
amount of death that was inflicted by
the JEWISH run gulag system in the … Continue reading In Stalin’s Gulags
By: John Wear
Original source: https://inconvenienthistory.com/11/1/6391 Great Britain’s
Blank Check to Poland On March 21, 1939, while hosting French Prime
Minister Édouard Daladier,
British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain discussed a joint
front with France,
Russia and Poland to act together against German aggression.
France agreed at once, and the Russians agreed on the condition that …
Continue reading Why Germany Invaded Poland
Since I was "red-pilled" in 2014 on the real history of World War 2, I have created multiple
webpages and used social media to spread the word about the truth. Last year, my twitter
account was suspended after I had almost 1500 followers. Three days ago, I just
that my 3rd facebook page "World …
Continue reading World War 2 Truth Gets Suspended By Facebook AND Twitter!
Death Toll Is To Be Believed & The Victims Are Conveniently Vaporized From History
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
The incineration of large numbers of people in Dresden is also indicated by
estimates of the extreme temperature reached in Dresden during the firestorm…
I saw the most painful scene ever… Several persons were near the entrance,
others at the flight of steps and many others further back
in the cellar. The shapes
suggested human corpses. The body
structure was recognizable and the shape
of the skulls, but
they had no clothes. Eyes and hair carbonized but not shrunk.
touched, they disintegrated into ashes, totally, no skeleton or separate bones.
I recognized a male corpse as that of my father.
THE DRESDEN DEATH TOLL
Many conflicting estimates
have been made concerning the number of deaths during the
raids of Dresden on February 13-14,
1945. Historian Richard J. Evans estimates that
approximately 25,000 people died during these
Frederick Taylor estimates that from 25,000 to 40,000 people died as…
View original post 3,037 more words
Remain Hidden & The Myth She Fought A Clean War Will Persist.
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
FAKE HISTORY LIE OF THE MONTH
Great Britain fought a clean war during
World War II.
“We will force Hitler into war, whether he wants it or not.”
Churchill 1936, From: Did Jews Fake Hitler’s “Master Race” Phrase To Create War?
In addition to ignoring all German
efforts to make peace, Winston Churchill and other leaders
of Great Britain began to conduct
a war of unprecedented violence. On July 3, 1940, a
British fleet attacked and destroyed much
of the French fleet at Oran in southwestern
Algeria to prevent it from falling into German hands.
The French navy went to the bottom
of the sea, and with it 1,297 French sailors. Churchill and
the British government did not
seem to mind that 1,297 of their French ally’s sailors
were killed in the attack.
This attack of the French fleet illustrates Churchill’s determination
to continue fighting…
View original post 1,199 more words
Editor's Note: If you don't know who Carolyn Yeager
is, you should definitely check out her website at: https://carolynyeager.net/
Carolyn has a lot of great articles, including this one, which focus on exposing the lies
of the holocaust, Jewish intrigue, World War II and National Socialism.
part of her website is the …
Continue reading The Hoax that won’t die
How the World Jewish Congress invented the Holocaust
Many historians focus only on towns like Dresden and Hamburg in regards to terror
bombing campaigns against German cities. Yes, both of these cities did get it the
but there were literally thousands of cities that were bombed, many completely
many civilians killed for no reason, since
most of the targets had absolutely no military significance.
Here are the details on the small town of Darmstadt, which was significantly bombed.
There are details about many more towns and cities that were ruthlessly bombed
the All-Lied terror bombing campaign at the following website:
Jews Bomb Germany
His Story Reveals The Allies Intentionally Protracted WWII & Devastated Europe.
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
“…Not only the enemy countries, but nearly all countries were bled
by this policy, which has left us all, except the
United States of America, impoverished
and in dire straits…”
enemy in the East is so terrible that every other consideration
to give way before it. If he [Stalin] succeeds in overrunning Europe, even only
temporarily, it will be the end of everything which has made life appear worth living!”
“What we in the German resistance [against Hitler] during the war didn’t
want to see,
learned in full measure afterward; that this war was
ultimately not waged against Hitler, but against Germany.”
Though Churchill wrote an extensive article about the tyranny and threat of the
Bolshevik Red Terror in 1920, he and the other Allies never declared
war against it
nor sought to crush it. Nor did they aide any nation trying…
View original post 3,217 more words
Order Hellstorm at the Barnes Review Description It was the most deadly and
war in human history. Millions were killed, billions in property was destroyed,
were reduced to rubble—WWII was truly man’s greatest cataclysm.
Thousands of books,
movies and documentary films have been devoted to the war. But there has never been …
Continue reading HELLSTORM: THE DEATH OF NAZI GERMANY, 1944-1947 – New Edition
This article was originally published in the Journal of Historical Review
in 1983 by Mark Weber.
According to Mr. Weber, he came across this article totally by
accident as he was looking at
old microfiche of the Volkischer Beobachter (NSDAP party paper).
The original article
by Haffner was from August 1942 titled "The Reintegration …
Continue reading Sebastian Haffner’s 1942 Call for Mass Murder of Germans
does a person write an essay on this topic?
me, there is only one way and that is with anger mixed with terrible sadness.
Anger is caused by the heinousness and enormity of these purposeful and deliberate
outrages and crimes. Deep, depressing sadness is caused when contemplating the
large numbers of innocent lives lost, or for those
who managed to survive, for the many
The gravity of this topic can be crushing, and we recognize that few blog
visitors will bother to read this essay in its entirety. But, lack of readership will not deter
me from writing this as I feel morally compelled to do so. The mass murders
of the Allies,
the alleged “good guys”, are both
unconscionable and cry out to Heaven for justice.
The recent magazine edition (above) that prompted me to write
this post can be purchased at the link…
View original post 2,003 more words
German-Canadian Dr Who Escaped Eisenhower’s Death Camps, Discovers The “New-Crime” Virus
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
Why would a non-violent middle aged
Canadian woman released from a German prison
be advised to flee Germany
immediately by train to return to Canadain 2018?
Is this almost the same journey her father survived after being
smuggled out of an Eisenhower death camp by an Allied soldier?
father was a young German medical student marked for death
by deliberate starvation post-WWII.
He survived and earned, among many other awards, the Order of Canada
in 1976 for
service to Canadian, specifically Inuit, health programs
and initiatives that saved countless lives.
Monika, a violinist,
was an active Green Party member. She also ran as
a federal Green
Party candidate in Alberta’s Yellowhead in 2006, 2008 and 2011.
Without even mentioning her brother Alfred’s plight, and worse, we can
envisage a Hollywood blockbuster thriller movie in the making.
Any day now…
Before You Watch The Video Interview…
View original post 872 more words
By Richard J. Evans. A Refutation Of The Dresden Firestorm Chapter
WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2
The Dresden raid was the perfect execution of the Bomber Command theory of
the double blow: two waves of bombers, three hours apart, followed the next day
by a massive daylight raid by more bombers and escort fighters. Only a handful
of raids ever actually conformed to this double-strike
theory, and those that did were cataclysmic…
…The fires from the first raid alone had been visible
more than 100 miles from Dresden…
estimate that temperatures reached 1,500° Centigrade (2,732° Fahrenheit).
Since temperatures in a cremation chamber normally reach only 1,400 degrees to
1,800 degrees Fahrenheit, large numbers of people in Dresden would
have been incinerated from the extreme heat generated in the firestorm.
Lying About Hitler Book Review
British historian Richard J. Evans wrote a 740-page report
to help defend
Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher, Penguin Books,
a libel suit filed by David Irving in London…
View original post 4,141 more words
Many of you may be aware that Holocaust documentary
filmmaker Eric Hunt is no longer
making any of his movies since last year, February 2017.
Eric did an excellent job with
his films, exposing the lies about the holocaust in a very engaging
and entertaining way. His last documentary, "Questioning the Holocaust Part 1" is …
Continue reading The Strange Case of Eric Hunt
published at: Spiegel Online Thousands of German children -- many of them
toddlers fleeing the
Soviet advance -- died in Danish refugee camps at the end of
World War II. A crusading doctor
has set out to document their suffering and break
long-standing beliefs about post-war Danish
humanity. When the Russians advanced to Berlin, …
Continue reading A Legacy of Dead German Children
Editor's Note: I whole-heartedly agree with the following appraisal of this book,
Myth of German Villainy", which has just recently been banned by Amazon,
just like Mike
King's "The Bad War". This book had a huge impact on me four years ago,
I read it for the first time. It makes a great …
Continue reading The Myth of German Villainy – WW2 – International Jewry vs Germany
The Truth About World War II Is Beginning To Emerge 74 Years Later
“The Lies About World War II” (https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/05/13/the-lies-about-world-war-ii/)
is my most popular column of the year. It is a book review of David Irving’s
Hitler’s War and Churchill’s War, the first volumn of Irving’s
three volume biography of
Winston Churchill. A person does not know anything
about WW II until he has read these books.
Historians, and even book reviewers, who tell the truth pay a high price. For reasons I
provide in my review, generally it is decades after a war before truth about the war can
emerge. By then the court historians have fused lies with patriotism and created a pleasing
myth about the war, and when emerging truth impinges on that myth,
truth-teller is denounced for making a case for the enemy.
Wars are fought with words as well as with bullets and bombs. The propaganda and
demonization of the enemy are extreme. This is especially the case when it is the victors
who start the war and have to cover up this fact as well as the war crimes for
are responsible. When decades later the covered up crimes of the victors
are brought to
light, truth is up against the explanation that has been controlled
for a half century. This
makes the truth seem outlandish, and this makes it
easy to demonize
and even destroy the historian who brought the truth to the
This makes a problem
for a reviewer of revisionist history of World War II. If a reviewer
honest review, he faces the same demonization as
the historian who brought the
truth about the war to the surfice.
This happened to me when I reviewed Irving’s books, both of which were researched for
decades and completely documented. I was supposed to denounce Irving, in which
case my stock would have gone up, but giving him an honest review got me branded
“a holocaust denier” by Wikipedia, in my opinion a CIA front created
in order to protect the official stories by marginalizing truth-tellers.
I have never studied the holocaust or written anything about it. I
simply reported Irving’s
assessment based entirely on documented evidence
that many Jews were killed, but there
was not the organized holocaust that is
taught in the schools
and which is a crime to dispute in many European countries.
So, this is how bad it is. I am, according
to Wikipedia, a “holocaust denier” for the simple
reason that I honestly
reported Irving’s findings instead of jumping on him with hob-nailed
for giving evidence contrary to the protected official story.
Anyone who does
not protect official explanations is “suspect.”
In my opinion what makes historians suspicious of the official holocaust story is the
extreme resistance to any investigation of the event. One would think that investigation
would support the story if it were true. It would seem that it is the Jews who raise
questions about the holocaust by placing it off limits for open discussion. I personally
am not very interested in the holocaust, because WW II itself was a holocaust. Tens of
millions of people were killed. The Russians themselves lost 26 million, 20 million more
than the holocause figure of 6 million Jews. The Germans after the war was over lost
considerably more thn 6 million in the forced resettlements and General Eisenhower’s
murder of 1.5 million German POWs by starvation and exposure. ( See John Wear,
Germany’s War, and James Bacque, Other Losses, for the
massive evidence. )
World War II has become the Jewish holocaust, not everyone else’s.
My interest is the predominance of propaganda and lies over truth.
Ron Unz has the same
interest. Four months after my column, “The Lies
About World War II,” appeared, Unz took
the story further in his long
report, “Understanding World War II”
( http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/ ).
Unz’s columns tend to be monographs or small books, well beyond the
spans of most Americans. Unz has given me permission to
republish his monograph in installments. This is the first installment.
I learned from Unz’s article that getting rid of truth-tellers
has been the practice of the
West for a long time. Unz got interested in WW
II when Pat Buchanan’s book,
The Unnecessary War, became an issue
for The American Conservative, a magazine
for which Unz was the major
money man. Unz couldn’t find that much difference between
book and that of A.J. P. Taylor’s The Origins of the Second World War. Yet
The American Conservative, fearful of challenging WW II myths,
from its own founder, Pat Buchanan.
Disassociation from official truth cost Taylor his lecturership at Oxford University. Taylor’s
publication of The Origins of the Second World War, caused Oxford to decline to renew
Taylor’s appointment as a university lecturer in modern history. Taylor
left Oxford for a
lecturership at the University College London. Note that England’s
best historian at the
time was a mere lecturer, not a professor of modern history.
Truth-tellers don’t advance very far in the world of information.
Harry Elmer Barnes explained that the
origins of World War I were in France and Russia,
not in Germany, which was the
last to mobilize but was blamed for the war, resulting in
the Treaty of Versailles,
which led to WW II. Unz was stunned to find that
Barnes, a historian of great
stature, was unknown to him. Unz writes:
“Imagine my shock at later discovering that Barnes had actually been one of the most
frequent early contributors to Foreign Affairs, serving as a primary book reviewer for
that venerable publication from its 1922 founding onward, while his stature as one of
America’s premier liberal academics was indicated by his scores of appearances in The
Nation and The New Republic throughout that decade. Indeed, he is credited
played a central role in ‘revising’ the history of the
First World War so as to remove the
cartoonish picture of unspeakable German
wickedness left behind as a legacy of the dishonest
wartime propaganda produced
by the opposing British and American governments. And his
was demonstrated by his thirty-five or more books, many of them
volumes, along with his numerous articles in
The American Historical Review,
Political Science Quarterly, and other leading journals.
“A few years ago I happened to mention Barnes to an eminent American academic
whose general focus in political science and foreign policy was quite
similar, and yet the
name meant nothing. By the end of the 1930s, Barnes had
become a leading critic of
America’s proposed involvement in World War
II, and was permanently ‘disappeared’ as
a consequence, barred from
all mainstream media outlets, while a major newspaper chain
was heavily pressured
into abruptly terminating his
long-running syndicated national column in May
Unz next tells
us how the establishment got rid of Charles A. Beard. Beard was an
of high stature. But “once he turned against Franklin D. Roosevelt’s warmongering
foreign policy, publishers shut their doors to him, and only his personal friendship with the
head of the Yale University Press allowed his critical 1948 volume, President Roosevelt and
the Coming of the War, 1941, to even appear in print. Beard’s stellar reputation
have begun a rapid decline from that point onward, so that by 1968 historian
Richard Hofstadter could write: ‘Today Beard’s reputation stands like
an imposing ruin
in the landscape of American historiography. What was once
the grandest house in
the province is now a ravaged survival’. Indeed,
Beard’s once-dominant ‘economic interpretation of history’
these days almost be dismissed as promoting ‘dangerous conspiracy theories,’
and I suspect few non-historians have even heard of him.”
William Henry Chamberlin was one of America’s leading foreign policy journalists,
author of 15 books whose writings appeared regularly in The Atlantic Monthly
His career was terminated when his critical analysis of
America’s entry into WW II,
America’s Second Crusade, was
published in 1950.
other examples of highly credible authors being cast into darkness for telling
the truth while the establishment provides lavish rewards to those who endorse the
propaganda line. Unz concludes that “A climate of serious intellectual repression greatly
complicates our ability to uncover the events of the past. Under normal circumstances,
competing claims can be weighed in the give-and-take of public or scholarly debate, but
this obviously becomes impossible if the subjects being discussed are forbidden ones.”
The victors control the explanations and bury their own guilt and war
crimes behind a
humanitarian smokescreen of “saving democracy.” It
is the function
of historians to penetrate the smokescreen and to dig up the
One of the
icons of the Anglo-American world is Winston Churchill. Unz summarizes
of the information historians have uncovered about Churchill:
“Until recently, my familiarity with Churchill had been rather cursory, and
were absolutely eye-opening. Perhaps the most striking
single discovery was the remarkable
venality and corruption of the man, with
Churchill being a huge spendthrift who lived lavishly
and often far beyond his
financial means, employing an army of dozens of personal servants
at his large
country estate despite frequently lacking any regular and assured sources of
to maintain them. This predicament naturally put him at the mercy of those individuals
willing to support his sumptuous lifestyle in exchange for determining his political activities.
And somewhat similar pecuniary means were used to secure the backing of a network of other
political figures from across all the British parties, who became Churchill’s close political allies.
“To put things in plain language,
during the years leading up to the Second World War,
both Churchill and numerous
other fellow British MPs were regularly receiving sizable
bribes—from Jewish and Czech sources in exchange for promoting
of extreme hostility toward the German government and actually advocating war.
sums involved were quite considerable, with the Czech government alone probably
making payments that amounted to tens of millions of dollars in present-day money to
elected officials, publishers, and journalists working to overturn the official peace
policy of their existing government. A particularly notable instance occurred in early 1938
when Churchill suddenly lost all his accumulated wealth in a foolish gamble on the American
stock-market, and was soon forced to put his beloved country estate up for sale to avoid
personal bankruptcy, only to quickly be bailed out by a foreign Jewish millionaire intent upon
promoting a war against Germany. Indeed, the early stages of Churchill’s involvement in
this sordid behavior are recounted in an Irving chapter aptly entitled ‘The Hired Help.’
“Ironically enough, German Intelligence
learned of this massive bribery of British parliamentarians,
and passed the information
along to Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was
horrified to discover the
corrupt motives of his fierce political opponents, but apparently
much of a gentlemen to have them arrested and prosecuted. I’m no expert
in the British laws of that era, but for elected officials to do the bidding of foreigners on
matters of war and peace in exchange for huge secret payments seems almost a textbook
example of treason to me, and I think that Churchill’s timely
would surely have saved tens of millions of lives.
“My impression is that individuals of low personal character are those most likely to sell
out the interests of their own country in exchange for large sums of foreign money,
and as such usually constitute the natural targets of nefarious plotters and foreign spies.
Churchill certainly seems to fall into this category, with rumors of massive personal
corruption swirling around him from early in his political career. Later, he supplemented
his income by engaging in widespread art-forgery, a fact that Roosevelt later discovered
and probably used as a point of personal leverage against him. Also quite serious was
Churchill’s constant state of drunkenness, with his inebriation being so widespread as to
constitute clinical alcoholism. Indeed, Irving notes that in his private
FDR routinely referred to Churchill as ‘a drunken bum.’
“During the late 1930s, Churchill
and his clique of similarly bought-and-paid-for political
allies had endlessly
attacked and denounced Chamberlain’s government for its peace
he regularly made the wildest sort of unsubstantiated accusations, claiming
the Germans were undertaking a huge military build-up aimed against Britain. These
charges were often widely echoed by a media heavily influenced by Jewish
and did much to poison the state of German-British relations. Eventually, these
pressures forced Chamberlain into the extremely unwise act of providing
guarantee of military backing to Poland’s irresponsible dictatorship.
a result, the Poles then rather arrogantly refused any border negotiations with Germany,
thereby lighting the fuse which eventually led to the German invasion six months later
and the subsequent British declaration of war. The British media had widely promoted
Churchill as the leading pro-war political figure, and once Chamberlain was forced to create
a wartime government of national unity, his leading critic
into it and given the naval affairs portfolio.
“Following his lightening six-week defeat of Poland, Hitler unsuccessfully sought to make
peace with the Allies, and the war went into abeyance. Then in early 1940, Churchill
persuaded his government to try strategically outflanking the Germans by preparing a
large sea-borne invasion of neutral Norway; but Hitler discovered the plan and preempted
the attack, with Churchill’s severe operational mistakes leading to a surprising defeat for
the vastly superior British forces. During World War I, Churchill’s Gallipoli disaster
forced his resignation from the British Cabinet, but this time the friendly
ensure that all the blame for the somewhat similar debacle at Narvik
was foisted upon
Chamberlain, so it was the latter who was forced to resign,
with Churchill then replacing
him as prime minister. British naval officers were
appalled that the primary architect of their
humiliation had become its leading
political beneficiary, but reality is what the
media reports, and the British
public never discovered this great irony.
“This incident was merely the first of the long series of Churchill’s major military failures
and outright betrayals that are persuasively recounted by Irving, nearly all of which were
subsequently airbrushed out of our hagiographic histories of the conflict. We should recognize
that wartime leaders who spend much of their time in a state of drunken stupor are far less
likely to make optimal decisions, especially if they are as extremely prone
to military micro-management as was the case with Churchill.
“In the spring of 1940, the Germans launched their sudden armored
thrust into France via
Belgium, and as the attack began to succeed, Churchill
ordered the commanding British
general to immediately flee with his forces to
the coast and to do so without informing his
French or Belgium counterparts of
the huge gap he was thereby opening in the Allied
front-lines, thus ensuring
the encirclement and destruction of their armies. Following
defeat and occupation, the British prime minister then ordered a sudden,
attack on the disarmed French fleet, completely destroying it and killing some 2,000
of his erstwhile allies; the immediate cause was his mistranslation of a single French word,
but this ‘Pearl Harbor-type’ incident continued to rankle French leaders for decades.
“Hitler had always wanted friendly
relations with Britain and certainly had sought to avoid
the war that had been
forced upon him. With France now defeated and British forces driven
Continent, he therefore offered very magnanimous peace terms and a new German
alliance to Britain. The British government had been pressured into entering the war for no
logical reason and against its own national interests, so Chamberlain and half the Cabinet
naturally supported commencing peace negotiations, and the German proposal probably
would have received overwhelming approval both from the British public
political elites if they had ever been informed of its terms.
“But despite some occasional wavering, Churchill remained absolutely adamant
war must continue, and Irving plausibly argues that his motive was an
one. Across his long career, Churchill had had a remarkable
record of repeated failure,
and for him to have finally achieved his lifelong
ambition of becoming prime minister
only to lose a major war just weeks after
reaching Number 10 Downing Street would
have ensured that his permanent place
in history was an extremely humiliating one.
On the other hand, if he managed
to continue the war, perhaps the situation might
somehow later improve, especially
if the Americans could
be persuaded to eventually enter the conflict on the
ending the war with Germany was in his nation’s interest but not his own, Churchill
undertook ruthless means to prevent peace sentiments from growing so strong that they
overwhelmed his opposition. Along with most other major countries, Britain and Germany
had signed international conventions prohibiting the aerial bombardment of civilian urban
targets, and although the British leader had very much hoped the Germans would attack
his cities, Hitler scrupulously followed these provisions. In desperation, Churchill
therefore ordered a series of large-scale bombing raids against the German capital of
Berlin, doing considerable damage, and after numerous severe warnings, Hitler finally
began to retaliate with similar attacks against British cities. The population saw the heavy
destruction inflicted by these German bombing raids and was never informed of the British
attacks that had preceded and provoked them, so public sentiment greatly
against making peace with the seemingly diabolical German adversary.
“In his memoirs published a half-century later, Prof. Revilo P. Oliver, who
had held a senior
wartime role in American Military Intelligence, described this
sequence of events in very bitter terms:
Great Britain, in violation of all the ethics of civilized warfare that had theretofore been
respected by our race, and in treacherous violation of solemnly assumed diplomatic
covenants about “open cities”, had secretly carried out intensive bombing of
cities in Germany for the express purpose of killing enough
unarmed and defenceless men
and women to force the German government
reluctantly to retaliate and bomb British cities
and thus kill enough
helpless British men, women, and children to generate among
enthusiasm for the insane war to which their government had committed them.
It is impossible to imagine a governmental act more vile and more depraved than contriving
death and suffering for its own people — for the very citizens whom it was exhorting to
“loyalty” — and I suspect that an act of such infamous and savage treason
nauseated even Genghis Khan or Hulagu or Tamerlane, Oriental
reprobated for their insane blood-lust. History,
so far as I recall, does not record that
they ever butchered their own
women and children to facilitate lying propaganda….In 1944
of British Military Intelligence took it for granted that after the war
Sir Arthur Harris would be hanged or shot for high treason against the British people…
“Churchill’s ruthless violation of the laws of war regarding
urban aerial bombardment directly
led to the destruction of many of Europe’s
finest and most ancient cities. But perhaps
influenced by his chronic drunkenness,
he later sought to carry out even more horrifying
war crimes and was only prevented
from doing so by the
dogged opposition of all his military and political subordinates.
“Along with the laws prohibiting
the bombing of cities, all nations had similarly agreed to
ban the first use
of poison gas, while stockpiling quantities for necessary retaliation.
Germany was the world-leader in chemistry, the Nazis had produced the most
forms of new nerve gases, such as Tabun and Sarin, whose use might have easily
resulted in major military victories on both the Eastern and Western fronts, but Hitler had
scrupulously obeyed the international protocols that his nation had signed. However, late
in the war during 1944 the relentless Allied bombardment of German cities led to the
devastating retaliatory attacks of the V-1 flying bombs against London, and an outraged
Churchill became adamant that German cities should be attacked with poison gas in
counter-retaliation. If Churchill had gotten his way, many millions of British might soon have
perished from German nerve gas counter-strikes. Around the same time, Churchill was also
blocked in his proposal to bombard Germany with hundreds of thousands of deadly
anthrax bombs, an operation that might have rendered much
and Western Europe uninhabitable for generations.”
Equally unsettling facts have emerged from their burial yards
Franklin D. Roosevelt and Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Click on this text to watch revelations regarding the The German SCIENTISTS, the SS and GENERAL HANS KAMMLER.
most Americans know about German World War II rockets. A few even know that in addition to the car engine
the Germans also invented the jet and perfected the superhighway or autobahn (the three most important inventions binding
this vast country [i.e. America; Scriptorium ed.] together). Virtually no one knows that in Wright-Patterson Field in Ohio,
in the Library of Congress and in the Department of Commerce in Washington, a "mother lode" of 1,500 tons of
German patents and research ...
But there were plenty of German military
weapons developed during World War II, and theory or real, this list has all the craziest inventions,
supposedly developed by the Nazis. Secret Technologies Invented by the Nazis 1. Nuclear Weapons
They simply have to be agreed upon again. Germany has
done this through many agreements after WWII which among other things have protected the patents of
German companies. If among the patents approved after the war were inventions that the allied had
confiscated after the war, their original patent protection was restored. If the patent
was not approved by the patent authorities or it had been registered to some othe rcompany, the patent
World War II military equipment of
Germany (5 C, 18 P) Pages in category "German inventions of the Nazi period" The following
29 pages are in this category, out of 29 total.
1. Guided Weapons By Kogo. One
of the innovative concepts that emerged during WWII was in-flight guidance onto a moving target. One of
the earliest examples was the Fritz X anti-ship bomb, first deployed by the German Air Force in 1943: An
operator in the launch aircraft guided the Fritz X to its target using radio control, sinking an Italian Battleship.
German inventions and discoveries
are ideas, objects, processes or techniques invented, innovated or discovered, partially or entirely, in Germany or abroad
by a person from Germany (that is, someone born in Germany – including to non-German parents –
or born abroad with at least one German parent and who had the majority of their education or career in Germany).
7 German Inventions That Changed The
World German inventors are responsible for the Diesel engine, Bunsen burner, electron microscope, printing press,
tape recorder, MP3 audio format and the...