The Circumcision Phallacy
To begin my historical and contemporary exposé of
Jewish Zionist control of America, I’ll begin
glaring example of control that everyone is aware of, but
far too few ever bother to examine the history
of, or basic
reason for it. And that is the totally unnecessary and
barbarous practice of male circumcision. If
that Jews have no inordinate influence in America just
think about circumcision for starters.
The following is from an article that appeared in the New
York Times on September 12 th , 2012, by Sharon
Denouncing City’s Move to Regulate Circumcision
carried the sleeping infant boy
on a white pillow toward the synagogue’s altar,
and passed him to her son.
The son carried the
infant toward the mohel, or Jewish ritual
circumciser, who stood amid a cluster of chanting
The mohel lifted the infant’s clothing to expose his
tiny penis. With a rapid flick of a two-sided
scalpel, the mohel sliced off the foreskin and held
it between his fingers. Then he took a sip of red
a cup and bent his head. He placed his
lips below the cut, around the base of the baby’s
penis, for a split
second, creating suction, and then
let the wine spill from his mouth out over the
The mohel, A.
Romi Cohn, then assured the infant
that he was O.K. The infant stop crying after a
while and the sanctuary filled
with elated prayer.
Mr. Cohn claims to have performed more than
25,000 circumcisions, on babies and adults
raises a question related to the procedure
performed on adults], in New York City and
the last 40 years. He said that
whenever he circumcises an infant he always puts
his mouth on the baby’s penis
to pull blood away
from the wound as part of an ancient ritual known
in Hebrew as metzitzah b’peh. It is still
commonplace in parts of the ultra-Orthodox
Jewish community, but is rare in other branches of
Judaism. Of course
Mr. Cohn, who has written a
textbook on the subject, always rinses his mouth
with antiseptic before a circumcision.
New York City’s health department estimated that
there are some 3,600 local circumcisions each year
incorporating the metzitzah b’peh ritual. The
health department said that, between 2000 and
babies contracted herpes as a result
and two of them died. Consequently the Center for
Disease Control and Prevention
declared that the
procedure is unsafe as it creates a risk of
transmitting herpes and other pathogens.
The N.Y.C. Board of Health was scheduled to vote
on a proposal that would require parents to sign a
indicating that they are aware of the
rise of herpes transmission when a circumcision
procedure, or bris, includes
direct oral contact.
Mr. Cohn, 83, flatly stated that he would rather go
to jail than comply with the consent
He acknowledged that there are unqualified
circumcisers working without proper health testing
training, but he believes that the ritual is
perfectly safe when performed by him or another
by the American Board of
Ritual Circumcision (ABORC). Mr. Cohn is the
chairman of ABORC which assures anyone
concerned that circumcision has been a central
tenet of the Jewish faith since time immemorial
a sacred and immutable covenant
between the Jewish people and the Creator [even
though the Creator created the foreskin
'If you follow strictly the ritual, there will be no
harm to the baby,” Cohn
said. “A circumcision is a
joyous occasion – nothing traumatic about it.'”
[This is what
any twisted psychopath would say
when speaking for himself about the pain of others].
almost no one knows about circumcision is that it became widespread as a measure to curb masturbation, which, considered
a vice in its own right, was also thought to be responsible for an array of crippling conditions, from epilepsy to digestive
dysfunction to muscle atrophy. Below are a list of quotes from esteemed physicians of their day, which speak to, in no uncertain
terms, their intent to make circumcision a painful, traumatic procedure, and to ensure that the result be a permanent loss
“In cases of masturbation we must, I believe, break the habit by inducing
such a condition
of the parts as will cause too much local suffering to allow of the practice
to be continued.
For this purpose, if the prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient
with present and
probably with future advantages; the operation, too, should not be performed
so that the pain experienced may be associated with the habit we wish to eradicate.”
On An Injurious Habit Occasionally Met with in Infancy and
Athol A. W. Johnson. The Lancet, vol. 1 (7 April
1860): pp. 344-345.
“A remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in
small boys is circumcision.
The operation should be performed without administering anesthetic,
as the brief pain attending
the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially,
if it is connected
with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases.”
John Harvey Kellogg, creator of the Corn Flake, Treatment
for Self-Abuse and Its Effects,
Plain Facts for Old and Young,”
Burlington, Iowa: P. Segner & Co. 1888, p. 295.
“Measures more radical than circumcision would, if public opinion permitted
adoption, be a true kindness to many patients of both sexes.”
Jonathan Hutchinson, On Circumcision as Preventative of Masturbation,
Archives of Surgery, Vol. 2 (1891): pp. 267-268.
“Another advantage of circumcision… is the lessened liability
to masturbation. A long
foreskin is irritating per se, as it necessitates more manipulation
of the parts in bathing…
This leads the child to handle the parts, and as a rule, pleasurable
sensations are elicited
from the extremely sensitive mucous membrane, with resultant manipulation
The exposure of the glans penis following circumcision … lessens the
sensitiveness of the organ…
It therefore lies with the physician, the family adviser
in affairs of hygiene and medical, to urge its acceptance.”
Ernest G. Mark, Circumcision, American Practitioner and News, vol. 31 (1901): p. 231.
[urination], loss of flesh, convulsions, phosphatic calculus, hernia,
nervous exhaustion, dyspepsia,
diarrhea, prolapse of rectum, balanitis, acute phimosis
and masturbation are all conditions
induced by the constricted long prepuce,
and all to be rapidly remedied by the simple operation
H. G. H. Naylor, A
Plea for Early Circumcision, Pediatrics, vol. 12 (1901): p. 231
“It is generally accepted that irritation derived from a tight
prepuce may be followed by
nervous phenomena, among these being convulsions and outbreaks resembling
It is therefore not at all improbable that in many infants who die in convulsions,
the real cause of death is a long or tight prepuce.”
A.L. Wolbarst, MD. “Universal Circumcision as a Sanitary Measure.”
Journal of the American Medical Association, (1914) Vol.62. pp.92-97.
“The prepuce is one of the great factors in causing masturbation
in boys. Here is the
dilemma we are in: If we do not teach the growing boy to pull the prepuce
cleanse the glans there is danger of smegma collecting and of adhesions and ulcerations
forming, which in their turn will cause irritation likely to lead to masturbation. If we do teach
the boy to pull the prepuce back and cleans his glans, that handling alone is sufficient
gradually and almost without the boy’s knowledge to initiate him into the habit of masturbation…
Therefore, off with the prepuce!”
William J. Robinson, Circumcision and Masturbation, Medical World, vol.33 (1915): p.390.
suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is “against nature”, but that
is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male
shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the
sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary,
requires chastity, and the glans of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture
sensitive than skin. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn
to his penis much less often.
I am convinced that masturbation is much
less common in the circumcised. With these
considerations in view it does
not seem apt to argue that ‘God knows best how to make little boys.'”
R.W. Cockshut. Circumcision. British Medical Journal, Vol.2 (1935): p.764.
Now give some thought
as to why the majority of non-
Jewish American infants were, and are, routinely
circumcised. And don’t parrot
the horseshit about how
circumcision is a hedge against disease and cancer, or it
reduces promiscuity. In fact,
removing the foreskin
promotes promiscuity; the circumcised penis has no
“sheath” to protect the sensitive
penis glans from rubbing
against garments causing inconvenient erections.
God did not provide a protective
foreskin for the penis so
that it could be removed in a barbaric procedure, or a
religious ritual, without the benefit
of anesthetics. And
who the hell are these Jews who presume to know better
than Mother Nature what is good for humankind...
MANkind in particular?
How did this circumcision crap get started in America,
and to a lesser degree
in Canada and Australia, anyway?
Evidently it goes back to the Ancient Egyptians, Muslims
and Semites. The Semites
supposedly started the practice
in order to make a covenant with God; which seems to
me like an asinine means to
make a covenant with
anyone, especially God. If you ask a Jew why they still
do it, you’ll be told that, “It’s
a tradition that goes back to
the days of King David.” Or, “Circumcision is the key
Jews as the chosen people of
God”... As if that justifies it... And what a peculiar
means of identification.
I would prefer facial tattoos like
some Pacific islanders or cutting off a pinky finger like
the Japanese Yakuza,
or wearing a correctly wrapped
turban, rather than have my penis mutilated!
I even personally know a Mexican-American
man who had a
circumcision performed upon him in adulthood so that he
would “fit in.” He was in miserable
pain for weeks, but
by God he finally “fit in.” Such is an example of the thoroughness
of the brain-washing undergone by Americans through disinformation
and the repetitive adherence to a lie. Repeat a lie often
enough and long enough and it will become the
The practice of circumcision in America did not gain any
traction until 1914, when a New York City
doctor, Abraham Wolbarst, began a crusade for universal
circumcision as a preventative of syphilis, cancer
masturbation with his article that appeared in the Journal
of the American Medical Association, (Vol. 62, 1914,
There were others before him such as Dr. Lewis A.
Sayre, who in 1870, mistakenly announced
circumcision was a cure for polio, epilepsy and
masturbation. In 1877, Dr. John Harvey Kellogg (of
Creek, Michigan mind you) published the first
edition of, "Plain Facts for Old and Young", in which he
circumcision as a cure for masturbation. He
wrote, “The operation is to be performed without
anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the
operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind,
especially if it
be connected with the idea of
I, for one, would like to find out where Kellogg’s
so I can go piss on it with my circumcised penis!
Dr. Wolbarst again influenced the medical community
with a 1932 article stating that smegma causes cancer of
the penis, also cancer of the cervix of female partners of
infected males, and circumcision was the logical
preventive measure. But still, non-Jewish Americans
reluctant to have their male infant’s penis
mutilated. Penile smegma can be prevented by pulling
foreskin and washing the glans area. After all,
you don’t cut off your hands when they are unclean, you
Then, in 1935, two Jewish Americans in New York, Dr.
Hiram Yellin and an inventor, Aaron Goldstein,
introduced their invention, the Gomco Clamp. This
circumcision device was a scissors-like clamp consisting
a metal bell and a flat plate with a hole in it, brought
together with a screw to apply circular crushing and
force at the position of excision.
Gomco was the name of Aaron Goldstein’s
manufacturing company (Goldstein
Company) that promoted the circumcision device in all
of the modern medical journals as a safe, relatively
painless means of circumcision. The wound caused by
the bloodless procedure would reportedly heal in thirty-
With the introduction of the Gomco Clamp, and incessant
propaganda perpetrated in medical journals,
in America became almost routinely automatic by 1950.
Between 1950 and 1980, 90% of American male infants
were automatically circumcised, most often without
consulting the parents, especially in urban areas. The
became so commonplace in America that
when U.S. troops began the occupation of South Korea in
1950, any South Koreans were influenced to adopt routine
procedure began losing popularity in the 1980s as
reasonable American parents of newborn male children
the ridiculously barbarous practice and
refused their consent. The percentage of present
circumcision is about 80%
The practice is unheard of in countries such as China and
India where over two billion people
can’t be wrong.
Europeans, Mexicans, South Americans, and most non-
Muslim African countries do not practice
The Aussies and Canadians still have a high incidence of circumcision,
but the practice is rapidly losing popularity in those countries as well.
Americans mutilate their male children’s penises out of
fear of non-existent complications from disease;
done to conform to the “accepted norm.” Ask any
American female which she prefers to
look at, a
circumcised penis or a natural penis. The answer is rarely
natural. American females have been conditioned
prefer the sight of a circumcised penis that more closely
resembles an erect penis in the first place. Go figure.
Now... why would Jews want Americans to be circum-
cised? It wouldn’t be to have Americans make a covenant
with God as more chosen people... right? It wouldn’t be
to save Americans from the scourge of cancer, syphilis,
masturbation, or promiscuity, because there is no relation
to these scourges and an advantage of circumcision at all.
It wasn’t really all about selling a lot of Gomco Clamps
was it? No, it wasn’t about any of these scenarios!
Jews, as a tribal group, have been regularly expelled,
primarily for usury, subversion and treason, from many
countries, kingdoms, principalities and city-states in
Europe, and elsewhere, over the past one-thousand years.
Most notably were the expulsions by St. Cyril from
Alexandria in 415 A.D., the expulsion by Emperor Henry
Germany from Mainz in 1012 , which began the
persecution of Jews in Germany, the 1290 expulsion
from England, the
1306 expulsion from France, the 1492
expulsion by Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain (The
Inquisition), the 1569 expulsion
from all Papal states by
Pope Pius V, the 1593 expulsions from Italy and Bavaria,
the Russian pogroms that began
in 1881and continued
through the Russian revolution of the early Twentieth
Century; and of course, the German expulsion
prior to and during
BTW: The participation of primarily Jewish Americans in
the horrors of 9/11
is a perfect example of Jewish
treason and subversion.
The primary method used to identify Jewish men,
throughout this continuing history of expulsion, was to
require a suspected male Jew to expose his penis for
If the penis was circumcised, then a
conclusive identification was made.
Here is a statement from the autobiography
David R. Katz: “The Germans made men drop their
pants, even in the middle of a crowded street, in order
discover if they were circumcised or not.”
Also: “Jewish men, unlike their non-Jewish counterparts
[in the WWII resistance movement], were circumcised
and therefore could be easily identified.”
Some Jewish European men sought out underground
operations as a means of eluding
German persecution. Skin from the scrotum can indeed be
grafted to the penis to
fashion a foreskin and, if time is on
your side, there are skin stretching methods (see Dual
Tension Restorer) to
form a new foreskin.
In 1982, an American group called Brothers United for Future
Foreskin (BUFF) was formed
which publicized the use
of tape in non-surgical foreskin restoration.
IIn 1991, another group was formed
Information and Resources Centers (UNCIRC). And, as
humorous as it may be to some, in 1994,
incorporated into a group known as The National
Organization of Restoring Men (NORM) which was
called RECAP, an acronym for the group
identified by the phrase Recover a Penis.
An informative anti-circumcision
<intactamerica.org> the site is currently maintained.
Anyway... Dr. Wolbarst, Dr. Yellin, and Aaron
Goldstein, amongst others,
were well aware of the
identification method used in the European expulsions
and were determined to confuse the
by instigating and enabling the circumcision of tens of
millions of non-Jewish American male
influence in Canada and Australia enhanced the
popularity of circumcision as a means of Jewish
identification confusion in those countries as well.
And before we continue with what Germany did to the
let’s examine what some Jews did to Germany to
piss the Germans off in the first place. After all, how
have you heard the question, “Why were the
Germans so murderously angry at the Jews?” It wasn’t
because Hitler was anti-Semitic for no good reason and
forced his countrymen to expel the German Jews or else.
German court rules circumcision is 'bodily harm'
A court in Germany has ruled that circumcising young boys for religious reasons
to bodily harm. In a decision that has caused outrage among Jewish and
Muslim groups,the court
said that a child's right to physical integrity trumps religious and
parental rights.The case
involved a doctor who carried out a circumcision on a four
year-old that led to medical complications.
Thousands of Muslim and Jewish boys are
circumcised in Germany every year.Although male circumcision
- unlike female circumcision -
is not illegal in Germany,the court's judgement said the "fundamental
right of the child to
bodily integrityoutweighed the fundamental rights of the parents".Circumcision,
contravenes "interests of the child todecide later in life on his religious
'Protect religious freedom'
doctor involved in the case was acquitted and the ruling is not binding,
say it sets a precedent that would be taken into account by
other German courts.The president
of Germany's Central Council of Jews,
Dieter Graumann,called it "an unprecedented and
dramatic intervention in the right of
religious communities to self-determination".He urged
the country's parliament to
clarify the legal situation "to protect religious freedom against
Male circumcision is part of the ancient religious rituals of both
and Muslim faiths, as well as the traditions of some tribal groups.
In some countries, such as the United States,it is also not uncommon for parents
request that young boys are circumcised for health reasons.
The BBC's Stephen Evans in Germany
says it is unclear what the next legal
step will be, but this issue is a moral and political